Carr, S., “Testing the Environmental Decision-Making Framework,” in T861 Environmental Decision Making: A Systems Approach, Block 6 (Milton Keynes: The Open University, 1998).
Carr, S. and L. Levidow, “How Biotechnology Regulation Separates Ethics from Risk,” Outlook on Agriculture 26 (1997), 145-150.
de Vriend, H., “Biotechnology and Sustainable Production,” in How Can Biotechnology Benefit the Environment. The Report of A European Federation of Biotechnology Task Group on Public Perceptions of Biotechnology/The Green Alliance Workshop (London: The Green Alliance, 1997).
DETR, Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment Annual Report No. 4: 1996/97(London: DETR, 1998).
EC, Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European Commission (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1996).
EC, Press Dossier: First Meeting of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies 19 February (1998), Brussels, European Commission Secretariat General Directorate C.
English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside Council forWales and Joint Nature Conservation Committee, “Submission to the House of Lords European Communities Committee, Enquiry into the Regulation of Genetic Modification in Agriculture”, June 1998, para 3.3.4.
Fischler, F., Quoted in “EU Attitude to Biotech Threatens Jobs, says Fischler,” AgraFood Europe November (1997), p. 32.
Greenpeace, Genetic Engineering: Too Good to go Wrong? (London: Greenpeace, 1997).
Grove-White, R. and B. Szerszynski, “Getting behind Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Values 1 (1992), 285-296.
HMSO, Report of the Committee on the Ethics of Genetic Modification and Food Use(London: HMSO, 1993).
Levidow, L., S. Carr, von R. Schomberg, and D. Wield, “Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe: Harmonisation Difficulties, Opportunities, Dilemmas,” Science and Public Policy 23 (1996), 135-157.
Levidow, L., S. Carr, D. Wield, and von R. Schomberg, “European Biotechnology Regulation: Framing the Risk Assessment of a Herbicide-tolerant Crop,” Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (1997), 472-505.
Macrory, R., National Biotechnology Conference Report of the Rapporteur (London: DETR, 1997).
Meacher, M., Opening statement to the House of Lord Select Committee: 21 October, issued as a News Release, DETR, London, 1998.
Midgley, G., I. Munlo, and M. Brown, “The Theory and Practice of Boundary Critique: Developing Housing Services for Older People,” Journal of the Operational Research Society 49 (1998), 467-478.
NFU, Report of the Biotechnology Working Group (London: NFU, 1998), unpublished.
NFU, BSPB, BAA, UKASTA, and BSBSPA, Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Crops, Joint Response to MAFF Consultation (unpublished), 1997.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Genetically Modified Crops; the Social and Ethical IissuesConsultation Document, http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/rangers/ta/nuffield.htm, 24/04/98, 1998.
RSPB, Weed Control on the Farm: Management of Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Crops (Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK: RSPB, 1997), unpublished.
Sadler, B., Proposed Framework for the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment (Canada: Federal Environmental Review Office, 1994).
SAFE, http://www.gn.apc.org/safe/gmo.htm, 25/03/98, 1998.
Ulrich, W., “Some Difficulties of Ecological Thinking, Considered from a Critical Systems Perspective: a Plea for Critical Holism,” Systems Practice 6 (1993), 583-611.
Ulrich, W., A Primer to Critical Systems Heuristics for Action Researchers (Hull: Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, 1996).
Vines, G., “How Far Should We Go?,” New Scientist 141(1912) (1994), 12-13.
Wynne, B., “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm,” Global Environmental Change, June (1992), 111-127.