Power Analysis for the NOEC: What is the Probability of Detecting Small Toxic Effects on Three Different Species using the Appropriate Standardized Test Protocols? Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Hoeven, N.V.D. Ecotoxicology (1998) 7: 355. doi:10.1023/A:1008871932082 Abstract
The power to detect small toxic effects with ecotoxicity tests is investigated on the basis of ring tests for the protocols of three standardized reproduction tests. The test species are Daphnia magna, Eisenia fetida and Folsomia candida, respectively.
The coefficient of variance for reproduction in the controls of these tests is about 14.4% for D. magna, and 19% for both E. fetida and F. candida. Given the standardized test protocols this implies that a reduction inhibition of 20% will be observed in 80% of the D. magna tests and in only 18% of the tests with either E. fetida or F. candida. Comparing 5 different concentrations with one control, 12 replicas are needed per concentration and 27 in the control for D. magna, and 21 and 47, respectively, for both E. fetida and F. candida to observe an effect of 20% in at least 95% of the experiments.
The power analysis is based on a one-sided Dunnett test. This test assumes normal distributed data with equal variance at all treatments. These assumptions are checked for the D. magna test using ring test data. The distribution of these data does not deviate substantially from normal. For small toxic effects, no significant correlation between mean and variance of reproduction was observed.
Dunnett test Ring test Daphnia magna Eisenia fetida Folsomia candida References
Bruijn, J.H.M. de and Hof, M. (1997) How to measure no effect, part IV: how acceptable is the EC
from an environmental policy point of view?
Campbell, P.J. and Hoy, S.P. (1996) ED points and NOELs: how they are used by UK pesticide regulators
Chapman, P.M. and Caldwell, R.S. (1996) A warning: NOEC's are inappropriate for regulatory use
Chapman, P.F., Crane, M., Wiles, J., Noppert, F. and McIndoe, E. (1996) Improving the quality of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicity test
Dunnett, C.W. (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control.
J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.
Dunnett, C.W. (1964) New tables for multiple comparison with a control.
Dunnett, C.W. (1985) Multiple comparison between several treatments and a specified treatment. In T. Calinski & W. Klonecki, eds.
Linear Statistical Inference, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol 35, 39–47.
Prolonged toxicity study with Daphnia magna: effects on reproduction. EEC Draft guideline XI/681/86, version 4.
Hoeven, N. van der (1997) How to measure no effect, part III: Statistical aspects of NOEC and EC
Hoeven, N. van der, Noppert, F. and Leopold, A. (1997) How to measure no effect, part I: towards a new measure of chronic toxicity in ecotoxicology. Introduction and workshop results.
ISO/Draft Soil Quality-Effects of soil pollutants on Collombella (Folsomia candida). Determination of the inhibition of reproduction.
Report of the meeting of the participants of the international ring test of ISO/DIS 11268-2 of ISO/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2. Document ISO/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2 N55, prepared by F. Riepert, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft Institut für Chemikalienprüfung, September 1995.
Soil Quality-Effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction, Guideline ISO/DIS 11268-2.
Kula, C. (1995)
Summary of the second ring test on a reproduction toxicity test with the earthworm Eisenia fetida
. Document ISO/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2 N59, prepared by C. Kula, (Federal Biological Research Centre for Agricultural and Forestry, Dept. for Plant Protection and Application Techniques, Biology Division, Messeweg 11/12, D-3300 Braunzweig, Germany.
Mead, R. (1988)
The experimental design of experiments: statistical principles for practical application
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Daphnia sp., acute immobilization test and reproduction test OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals No 202. Paris (1984, draft revisal February 1994).
Statistical data analysis: main results from the OECD workshop on statistical analysis of aquatic toxicity data, Braunschweig, Germany, 15-17 October 1996. Room document 4, 12th meeting of the risk assessment advisory body, 12th-13th December 1996.
OECD (1997) Report of the final ring test of the
Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 6.
Pack, S. (1993)
A review of statistical data analysis and experimental design in OECD aquaic toxicity test guidelines
. Shell Research Ltd., Sittingbourne Centre, Sittingbourne, Kent, UK.
Riepert, F. (1993)
ISO ring test of a method for determining the effect of soil contaminants on the reproduction of collembola. Report to ISO/TC 190/SC 4, prepared by F. Riepert, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft Institut für Chemikalienprüfung, June 1993.
Riepert, F. (1995a)
Report of the results of the international ring test of ISO/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2 on ISO/DIS 11268-2 “Soil qualityeffects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) Part 2: determination of effects on reproduction”. Document ISO/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2 N57, prepared by F. Riepert, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft Institut für Chemikalienprüfung, September 1995.
Riepert, F. (1995b)
Report of the results of the international ring test ISI/TC 190/SC 4/WG 2 on 2nd “Collembola reproduction ring test”. Prepared by F. Riepert, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft Institut für Chemikalienprüfung, September, 1995.
Siegel, S. (1956)
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences
. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf (1995)
San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.
Suter II, G.W. (1996) Abuse of hypothesis testing statistics in ecological risk assessment.
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
Williams, D.A. (1971) A test for differences between treatments means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control.
Williams, D.A. (1972) The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998