Belief Fusion: Aggregating Pedigreed Belief States
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We introduce a new operator – belief fusion– which aggregates the beliefs of two agents, each informed by a subset of sources ranked by reliability. In the process we definepedigreed belief states, which enrich standard belief states with the source of each piece of information. We note that the fusion operator satisfies the invariants of idempotence, associativity, and commutativity. As a result, it can be iterated without difficulty. We also define belief diffusion; whereas fusion generally produces a belief state with more information than is possessed by either of its two arguments, diffusion produces a state with less information. Fusion and diffusion are symmetric operators, and together define a distributive lattice. Finally, we show that AGM revision can be viewed as fusion between a novice and an expert.
- Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., 1985, “On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530. CrossRef
- Arrow, K.J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition, New York: Wiley.
- Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., and Subrahmanian, V.S., 1992, “Combining knowledge bases consisting of first-order theories,” Computational Intelligence 8, 45–71.
- Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., and Prade, H., 1997, “From semantic to syntactic approaches to information combination in possibilistic logic,” pp. 141–161 in Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, B. Bouchon-Meunier, ed., New York: Physica Verlag.
- Birkhoff, G., 1948, Lattice Theory, Colloquium Publications, Vol. 25, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
- Borgida, A. and Imielinski, T., 1984, “Decision making in committees: A framework for dealing with inconsistency and non-monotonicity,” pp. 21–32 in Proceedings of the Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, New Paltz, NY.
- Boutilier, C., 1996, “Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 263–305. CrossRef
- Boutilier, C. and Goldszmidt, M., 1995, “On the revision of conditional belief sets,” pp. 267–300 in Conditionals: From Philosophy to Computer Science, G. Crocco, L. Fariñas del Cerro, and A. Herzig, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cantwell, J., 1998, “Resolving conflicting information,” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7, 191–220. CrossRef
- Darwiche, A. and Pearl, J., 1997, “On the logic of iterated belief revision,” Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29. CrossRef
- Freund, M. and Lehmann, D., 1994, “Belief revision and rational inference,” Technical Report TR 94–16, Hebrew University.
- Friedman, N. and Halpern, J.Y., 1996, “Belief revision: A critique,” pp. 421–431 in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR '96), L. Aiello, J. Doyle, and S. Shapiro, eds., San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Grove, A., 1988, “Two modellings for theory change,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170. CrossRef
- Hansson, S.-O., ed., 1997, Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, Special Issue on Non-Prioritized Belief Revision, 63(1–2).
- Jeffrey, R.C., 1965, The Logic of Decision, Chicago: University Press.
- Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A.O., 1991, “Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change,” Artificial Intelligence 52, 263–294. CrossRef
- Konieczny, S. and Pérez, R.P., 1998, “On the logic of merging,” pp. 488–498 in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR '98), A. Cohn, L. Shubert, and S. Shapiro, eds., San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Lehmann, D., 1995, “Belief revision, revised,” pp. 1534–1540 in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '95), S. Mellish, ed., San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Liberatore, P. and Schaerf, M., 1995, “Arbitration: A commutative operator for belief revision,” pp. 217–228 in Proceedings of the Second World Conference on the Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence (WOCFAI '95), M. De Glas and Z. Pawlak, eds., Paris, France.
- Maynard-Reid II, P. and Lehmann, D., 2000, “Representing and aggregating conflicting beliefs,” pp. 153–164 in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000), A.G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, and B. Selman, eds., San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Maynard-Reid II, P. and Shoham, Y., 1998, “From belief revision to belief fusion,” in Proceedings of the Third Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT3), Torino, Italy: ICER.
- Nayak, A.C., 1994, “Iterated belief change based on epistemic dntrenchment,” Erkenntnis 41, 353–390. CrossRef
- Nayak, A.C., Foo, N.Y., Pagnucco, M., and Sattar, A., 1996, “Changing conditional beliefs unconditionally,” pp. 119–135 in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK VI), Y. Shoham, ed., The Netherlands: De Zeeuwse Stromen.
- Revesz, P.Z., 1993, “On the semantics of theory change: Arbitration between old and new information,” pp. 71–82 in Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS '93), New York: ACM Press. CrossRef
- Sen, A., 1986, “Social choice theory,” pp. 1073–1181 in Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. III, K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
- Spohn, W., 1988, “Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states,” pp. 105–134 in Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, II, W.L. Harper and B. Skyrms, eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Williams, M.-A., 1994, “Transmutations of knowledge systems,” pp. 619–629 in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR '94), J. Doyle, E. Sandewall, and P. Torasso, eds., San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Belief Fusion: Aggregating Pedigreed Belief States
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Volume 10, Issue 2 , pp 183-209
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- belief aggregation
- knowledge representation
- multi-agent systems