Alchourrón, C.E. and Makinson, D., 1981, “New studies in deontic logic,” pp. 125–148 in New Studies in Deontic Logic, R. Hilpinen, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel.
Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., 1985, “On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision,” Journal of Symbolic Logic
Brink, C. and Heidema, J., 1989, “A verisimilar ordering of propositional theories: The infinite case,” Technical Report, TR-ARP-1/89, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
Brink, C. and Rewitzky, I., 1999, Power Structures and Program Semantics, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, Stanford, CA: CLSI.
Fuhrmann, A. and Hansson, S.O., 1994, “A survey of multiple contractions,” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information
Gärdenfors, P., 1984, “Epistemic importance and minimal changes of belief,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D., 1988, “Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment,” pp. 83–95 in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, M. Vardi, ed., Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Grove, A., 1988, “Two modellings for theory change,” Journal of Philosophical Logic
Hansson, S.O., 1989, “New operators for theory change,” Theoria
Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A.O., 1991, “Knowledge base revision and minimal change,” Artificial Intelligence
Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A.O., 1992, “On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it,” pp. 183–203 in Belief Revision, P. Gärdenfors, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarski, A., 1956, “Foundations of the calculus of systems,” pp. 342–383 in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, A. Tarski, ed., J.H. Woodger, trans., London: Oxford University Press.