Skip to main content
Log in

Beauty and the Beast: Animal abuse from a non-speciesist criminological perspective

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although interactions between people and other animals play an important part in the social arena, this topic has until recently largely been neglected by criminologists. Recent developments in ethical theory on the moral status of animals require a reconsideration of speciesist attitudes and practices permeating our dealings with animals. Hence, a non-speciesist criminology is called for. The most evident topic that comes to mind from a criminological point of view, namely ‘animal abuse’, is dealt with from such a non-speciesist angle in this paper. In a review of publications dealing witth the link between animal abuse, domestic violence and child abuse, two points are discussed: the neglect or selectivity in giving a definition of ‘animal abuse’ and the one-sided attention of criminlogists for individual instances of cruelty to animals of animal abuse, neglecting institutionalised instances of animal abuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Thomas Aquinas, “Differences between Rational and Other Creatures” (from: Summa Contra Gentiles), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Aquinas, On Killing Living Things and the Duty to Love Irrational Creatures (from: Summa Theologica), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. Ascione, “Children Who Are Cruel to Animals: a Review of Research and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology,” Anthrozoös 1994 (6:4), 226–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. Ascione, “Battered Women's Reports of Their Partners' and Their Children's Cruelty to Animals,” Journal of Emotional Abuse 1998 (1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. Ascione, C.V. Weber and D.S. Wood, “The Abuse of Animals and Domestic Violence: A National Survey of Shelters for Women who are Battered,” Society & Animals, 1997 (5:3), 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carol J. Adams and Josephine Donovan (eds.), Animals and Women. Feminist Theoretical Explorations (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Agnew, “The causes of animal abuse: a socio-psychological analysis,” Theoretical Criminology, 1998 (2:2), 177–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, “Animals and Slavery” (from: Politics), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers Beirne, “The Use and Abuse of Animals in Criminology: A brief History And Current Review,” Social Justice, 1995 (22:1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers Beirne, “The Law is an Ass: Reading E.P. Evans' The Medieval Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals,” Society & Animals, 1994 (2:1), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers Beirne, “A Note on Speciesist Language and (Nonhuman) Animal Abuse,” The Critical Criminologist, 1996 (7:1), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers Beirne, “Rethinking bestiality: Towards a concept of interspecies sexual assault,” Theoretical Criminology, 1997 (1:3), 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers Beirne, For a Nonspeciesist Criminology. Animal abuse as an object of study, Criminology, 1999 (37:1), 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremy Bentham, “A Utilitarian View” (from: The Principles of Morals and Legislation 1789), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ted Benton, “Rights and justice on a shared planet: More rights or new relations?,” Theoretical Criminology, 1998 (2:2), 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johan Braeckman, “Ethiek en het gedrag van mensen tegenover dieren. Een historisch overzicht,” Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 1996 (65), 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertrui Cazaux, “Legitimating the entry of “the animals issue” into (critical) criminology,” Humanity & Society, 1998 (22:4), 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middas Dekkers, Lief dier. Over bestialiteit, (Amsterdam: Contact, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, “Animals Are Machines” (from: Discourse on Method & Descartes: Philoposphical Letters), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephine Donovan and Carol J. Adams (eds.) Beyond Animal Rights, A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals, (New York: Continuum, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.P. Evans, The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals. The Lost History of Europe's Animal Trials, (London: Faber and Faber, 1987/1906).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan R. Felthous and Stephen R. Kellert, “Childhood Cruelty to Animals and Later Aggression Against People: A Review,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 1987 (144), 710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luc Ferry and Claudine Germé, Des animaux et des hommes. Anthologie des textes remarquables, écrits sur le sujet, du XVe siècle à nos jours, (Paris: Librarie Générale Française, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary L. Francione, “Animal Rights: An Incremental Approach,” in: R. Garner (ed.) Animal Rights. The Changing Debate, (New York: New York University Press, 1996), 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAIA, Wetenschappers Europese Commissie oordelen: eenden en ganzen onder dwang voederen voor foie gras is nefast voor dierenwelzijn, (Brussels: press-release, December 22nd 1998). http://users.skynet.be/sky74228/nl/nieuws/221298.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAIA, Toelichting bij foie gras productie, (Brussel, s.d.) http://users.skynet.be/sky74228/nl/info/foiegras.html.

  • Ruth Harrison, Animal Machines. The New Factory Farming Industry, (London: Vincent Stuart Ltd, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, “Duties in Regard to Animals” (from: Lectures on Ethics), in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen R. Kellert and Alan R. Felthous, “Childhood Cruelty toward Animals among Criminals and Noncriminals,” Human Relations, 1985 (38), 1113–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall Lockwood and Frank R. Ascione (eds.) Cruelty to Animals and Interpersonal Violence. Readings in Research and Application, (Indiana: Purdue University Press/West Lafayette, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian Luke, “Taming Ourselves or Going Feral? Toward a Nonpatriarchal Metaethic of Animal Liberation,” in: C.J. Adams and J. Donovan (eds.) Animals & Women. Feminist Theoretical Explorations, (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1995), 290–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phil MacNaghten and John Urry, Contested Natures, (London: Sage, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Nelken, “Reflexive Criminology?,” in: D. Nelken (ed.) The Futures of Criminology, (London, Sage, 1994), 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary T. Phillips, “Proper names and the Social Construction of Biography: The Negative Case of Laboratory Animals,” Qualitative Sociology, 1994 (17:2), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James Rachels, “Darwin, Species, and Morality,” in: T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (London: Prentice Hall, 1989/1976), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen Raes, “Rechten van dieren of een juridisch statuut voor beschermingswaardige goederen? De natuur als ethisch object,” in S. Gutwirth and R. Focqué (eds.) Juridische begripsstellingen en conceptuele verschuivingen in het recht. Het voorbeeld van de Milieuproblematiek, (Rotterdam: University of Rotterdam Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom Regan, The Case for Animal Rights, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985/1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • John D. Rigdon and Fernando Tapia, “Children Who Are Cruel to Animals — A Follow-Up Study,” Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 1977 (8:1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriet Ritvo, The Animal Estate. The English and Other creatures in the Victorian Age, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry S. Salt, Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress, (London: Centaur Press Limited, 1980/1892).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) Welfare Aspects of the Production of Foie Gras in Ducks and Geese, European Union, European Commission dg24 (16 December 1998). http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg/health/sc/scah/out17_en.html.

  • Ken Shapiro, “Animal Liberation Through Language,” PSYETA News, 1998 (18:Fall), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Singer, Dierenbevrijding, (Breda: Uitgeverij De Geus, 1994), (original: Animal Liberation, 1990, revised ed. of 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorian Solot, Untangling the Animal Abuse Web, Society & Animals, 1997 (5:3), 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kate Soper, What is Nature? Culture, Politics and the non-Human, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando Tapia, “Children Who Are Cruel to Animals,” Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 1971 (2), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geert Van Hoorick, “De Europese en Nationale Wetgeving op het welzijn van landbouwhuisdieren,” Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht, 1995 (18:1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geert Van Hoorick, “De Europese Wetgeving op de Dierenbescherming,” TBP, 1995 (50:1), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannelie Vermeulen and Johannes S.J. Odendaal, “Proposed Typology of Companion Animal Abuse,” Anthrozoös, 1993 (6:4), 248–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • David B. Wilkins (ed.) Animal Welfare In Europe. European Legislation and Concerns, (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cazaux, G. Beauty and the Beast: Animal abuse from a non-speciesist criminological perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change 31, 105–125 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347609286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347609286

Keywords

Navigation