Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arno R. Lodder, DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library Vol. 42

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashley, K. 1990. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordon, T. 1994. The Pleadings Game: An Exercise in Computational Dialectics Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(4): 239–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. 1995. The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., Leenes, R., and Lodder, A. 1994. Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2: 113–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenes, R. 1999. ‘Hercules or Karneades. Hard Cases in Law and Legal Informatics. Ph.D. thesis, Twente University. In Dutch.

  • Lodder, A. 1999. DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loui, R. 1998. Process and Policy: Resource-Bounded Nondemonstrative Reasoning’. Computational Intelligence 14(1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitta, K. et al. 1993. A Computational Model for Trial Reasoning. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on AI & Law. New York, pp. 20–29.

  • Pollock, J. 1987. Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11, 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. 1995. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H.: 1997. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Revised edition of the author's Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. 1999. ‘On Formalising Burden of Proof in Legal Argument’. In Proc. of the Twelfth Int. Conf. on Legal Knowledge-Based Systems (JURIX'99). Leuven Belgium, pp. 85–97.

  • Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. 1998. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6: 231–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. and Vreeswijk, C. 2000. Logical Systems for Defeasible Argumentation. To appear in D. Gabbay (ed.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, H. 1999. Automated Argument Assistance for Lawyers. In Proc. of the Seventh Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York, pp. 43–52.

  • Verheij, H. et al. 1998. An Integrated View on Rules and Principles. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6(1): 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreeswijk, C. 1993. Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation. The Journal of Logic and Computation 3(3): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreeswijk, C. 1995. The Computational Value of Debate in Defeasible Reasoning. Argumentation 9(2): 305–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. 1998. New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press.

  • Walton, D. and Krabbe, E. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk

Authors
  1. Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vreeswijk, G.A. Arno R. Lodder, DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library Vol. 42. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8, 265–276 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008345320940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008345320940

Keywords

Search

Navigation