Skip to main content
Log in

The Macro- and Micropolitics of Personnel Evaluation: A Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the authors explicate a conceptual framework for analyzing the politics of personnel evaluation in an educational context. Using several elements of their framework, they discuss the politics of teacher evaluation in California in relation to the types of personnel evaluation decisions, the actors, their access to these decisions, their sources and level of power, and the outcomes related to their decisions. The authors further portray how politics enters into personnel evaluation at the district level by describing an actual case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armiger, M. (1981). The political realities of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. (pp. 292–302). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1968). Two faces of power. In W. Hawley & F. Wh (Eds.), The search for community power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E. (1990). Evaluation for tenure and dismissal. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation. (pp. 147–157). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E., & Groves, B. (1990). Managing the incompetent teacher. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E. (1991). The incompetent teacher. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit. voice and loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeis, C. (1939). Teacher tenure legislation. Michigan Law Review. 37, 430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlen, B. (1995). The micropolitics of education: promise and limitations. In J. Scribner & D. Layton (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp. 147–168). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1968). The power of power. In W. Hawley and F. Wirt (Eds.), The search for community power (pp. 268–281). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1962). The theory of coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1981). Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J.H. (1995). Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: A conceptual framework. Studies in educational evaluation, 21, 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P. (1997). Lake wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirt, F.M., & Kirst, M.W. (1997). The political dynamics of American education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridges, E.M., Groves, B.R. The Macro- and Micropolitics of Personnel Evaluation: A Framework. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13, 321–337 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008182215705

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008182215705

Keywords

Navigation