Abstract
This paper presents a longitudinal study, from kindergarten to secondgrade, which aims to examine the relationship between morphologicalanalysis, phonological analysis and learning to read. Three phonologicalawareness tasks, five derivational and four inflectional subtests wereadministered to fifty children at each of the three levels. Evolution ofperformance was analyzed through the three years. Data showed that withthe exception of two subtests, performance increased from kindergarten tofirst grade and from first grade to second grade, without reaching ceilingperformance in second grade, at least for morphological subtests. Linksbetween morphological and phonological analyses were very strong: inparticular, syllable segmentation was highly correlated with themorphological subtests in kindergarten while phonemic segmentation wascorrelated with morphological subtests in first and second grade. Therewere also strong links between morphological analysis and reading.Regression analyses showed that while phonological awarenessexplained a major part of variance in first grade, both phonologicaland morphological scores explained significant part of variance of bothdecoding and comprehension reading scores in second grade. Thus, thislongitudinal study contributes to the evidence of a link between bothphonological and morphological analysis and learning to read French.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauvillain, C. & Segui, C. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In: R. Frost & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 377–388). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology, Word 14: 150–177.
Bertelson, J. & de Gelder, B. (1989). Learning about reading from illiterates. In: A. M. Galaburda (ed), From neuron to reading (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Bialystok, E. & Ryan, E. (1985). A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In: D. Forrest-Pressley, G.E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (eds) Metacognition, cognition and human performance Vol. 1 (pp. xxx). New York: Academic Press.
Bishop, D.V.M. (1983). T.R.O.G. Test for reception of grammar. Medical research council. University of Manchester. Chapel Press.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: a causal connection, Nature 301: 419–421.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology, Cognition 28: 297–332.
Carlisle, J. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students, Annals of Dyslexia 39: 90–108.
Carlisle, J. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders, Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 247–266.
Carlisle, J.F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In: L. Feldman (ed), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J. & Nomanbhoy, D.M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders, Applied Psycholinguistics 14: 177–195.
Cazden, C.B. (1968). The acquisition of nouns and verb inflections, Child Develoment 49: 433–448.
Elbro, C. (1989). Morphological awareness in dyslexia. In: C. von Euler, I. Lundberg & Lennerstrand (eds.), Brain and reading. Structural and functional anomalies in devel-opmental dyslexia with special reference to interactions, memory functions, linguistic processes and visual analysis in reading (pp. 189–209). London: MacMillan.
Elbro, C. & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia, Annals of Dyslexia 46: 209–240.
Feldman, L.B. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition, Psychological Research 53: 33–41.
Feldman, L.B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: differences between inflections and derivations, Journal of Memory and Language 33: 442–470.
Flower, A.E. & Liberman, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morpheme awareness. In: L. Feldman (ed.), Morphemic Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum.
Fox, B. & Routh, D.K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables and phonemes: A developmental study, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4: 331–342.
Gombert, J.-E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, N.K. (1991). Development of morphophonemic segments in children's mental representations, Applied Psycholinguistics 12: 217–239.
Kuczaj, S.A. (1978). Children's judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical irregular past-tense verbs, Child Development 49: 318–326.
Leong, C.K. (1989) Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers, Annals of Dyslexia 39: 94–115.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fisher, T.W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit Syllable and Phoneme Segmentation in the Young Child, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18: 201–212.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A. & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and Spelling Skills in the First School Years Predicted from Phonemic Awareness Skills in Kindergarten, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21: 159–173.
Macwhinney, B. (1975). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children, Journal of Child Language 2: 65–77.
Mahony, D. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability, Reading and writing: an interdisciplinary journal 6: 19–44.
Mahony, D.L. & Mann, V.A. (1992). Using children's humor to clarify the relationship between linguistic awareness and future reading ability, Cognition 45: 63–186.
Mann, V.A. & Liberman, I.Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short term memory: can they presage early reading success?, Journal of Learning Disabilities 17: 592–598.
Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. In: S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 5–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spontaneously?, Cognition 7: 323–331.
Nagy, W.E., Diabkidoy, I.A. & Anderson, R.C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: learning the contribution of the suffixes to the meaning of derivations, Journal of Reading Behavior 23: 155–170.
Nagy, W.E., Herman, P.A. & Anderson, R.C. (1985). Learning words from context, Reading Research Quarterly 20: 233–253.
Perez-Pereira, M. (1988). The acquisition of morphemes: some evidence from Spanish, Journal of Psycholinguistic research 18: 289–312.
Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability, Language and Speech 31: 337–355.
Segui, J. Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (1990). The role of the syllable in speech segmentation, phoneme identification, and lexical access. In: G.T.M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 263–280). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Selby, S. (1972). The development of morphological rules in children, The British Journal of Educational Psychology 42: 293–299.
Snowling, M. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondance in normal and dyslexic readers, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29: 294–305.
Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M. & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech analysis in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 489–507.
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E. & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten: issues of task comparability, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 175–190.
Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In: S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 67–84). NJ: Erlbaum.
Yopp, H.K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests, Reading Research Quarterly 23: 159–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casalis, S., Louis-Alexandre, MF. Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing 12, 303–335 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648