The Role of Social Distrust in Risk-Benefit Analysis: A Study of the Siting of a Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Distrust of social institutions is becoming an important component of risk communication and policy analysis. To assess the impact of social distrust on decision making, we examine the role of distrust of information sources on the willingness to accept a hazardous waste disposal facility in one's neighborhood. Using a prospective-reference utility model, distrust of information sources is analyzed a possible influence on individual choice in a risk-benefit tradeoff. Using contingent valuation survey data on the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility, we find that respondents are particularly distrustful of both governmental officials and waste disposal businesses. We find that social distrust increases the perceived risk of a facility and influences the likelihood of accepting a referendum to site a hazardous waste disposal facility. The level of compensation offered in the contingent valuation scenario also is found to influence a respondent's risk perception.
- Bojean, Charles and Michael Grimes. “Community Power: Issues and Findings,” Social Stratification: A Reader, New York: Harper 1974.
- Cook, Philip and Daniel A. Graham. “The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1977, Vol. 91 pp. 143–156.
- duVair, Pierre and John Loomis. “Household Valuation of Alternative Levels of Hazardous Waste Risk Reductions: an Application of the Referendum Format Contingent Valuation Method” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 39 pp. 143–155.
- Flynn, James, William Burns, C. K. Mertz and Paul Slovic. “Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High-Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1992, pp. 417–429.
- Frey, Bruno S. and Felix Oberholzer-Gee. “Fair Siting Procedures: An Empirical Analysis of Their Importance and Characteristics,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1996, pp. 353–376
- Frey, Bruno S., Felix Oberholzer-Gee and Reiner Eichenberger. “The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets,” Journal of Political Economy Vol. 104, No. 6, 1996 pp. 1297–1313.
- Frudenburg, William R. and Susan K. Pastor. “NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes,” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 48, No. 4 1992, pp. 39–61.
- Hanemann, Michael. “Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, August 1984 pp. 332–341.
- Inhaber, Herbert. “Of NIMBYs, LULUs, and NIMTOOs,” The Public Interest, Spring 1992, No. 107, pp. 52–64.
- Johannesson, Magnus, Per-Olov Jahnsson, Bengt Kristrom and Ulf-G Gerdtham. “Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy—Further Results” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 12, 1993 pp. 95–108.
- Kasperson, Roger E., Dominic Golding, and Seth Tuler. “Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 48, No. 4 1992, pp. 161–187.
- Kunreuther, Howard, and Douglas Easterling. “The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 15 No. 4 1996, pp. 601–622.
- Kunreuther, Howard, and Douglas Easterling. “Are Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs Possible in Siting Hazardous Facilities,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 80, No.2, May 1990, pp. 252–256.
- Kunreuther, Howard and Paul Slovic. “Science, Values and Risk” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1996, pp. 116–125.
- Leiss, William. “Three Phases in Evolution of Risk Communication Practice” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1996, pp. 85–94.
- Mitchell, Robert and Richard T. Carson. Using Surveys To Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington DC: Resources for the Future 1989.
- O'Hare Michael and Debra Sanderson. “Facility Siting and Compensation: Lessons from the Massachusetts Experience” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, 1993, pp. 364–376.
- Swallow, Stephen K., James J. Oplauch, and Thomas F. Weaver. “Siting Noxious Facilities: An Approach That Integrates Technical, Economic, and Political Considerations” Land Economics, August 1992, 68 3 pp. 283–301
- Smith, V. Kerry andWilliam H. Desvousges. “The Value of Avoiding a LULU: HazardousWaste Disposal Sites,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, 1986, pp. 293–299.
- Viscusi, W. Kip and William N. Evans. “Utility Functions that Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications” American Economic Review, Vol. 80 No. 3 June 1990, pp. 353–363.
- Viscusi, W. Kip. “Prospective Reference Theory: Toward and Explanation of the Paradoxes” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 2, 1989 pp. 235–264.
- The Role of Social Distrust in Risk-Benefit Analysis: A Study of the Siting of a Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume 15, Issue 3 , pp 241-257
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Contingent valuation
- risk assessment
- social distrust
- Industry Sectors