Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty in the Movie Industry: Does Star Power Reduce the Terror of the Box Office?

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Everyone knows that the movie business is risky. But how risky is it? Do strategies exist that reduce risk? We investigate these questions using a sample of over 2000 motion pictures. We discover that box-office revenues are asymptotically Pareto-distributed and have infinite variance. The mean is dominated by rare blockbuster movies that are located in the far right tail. There is no typical movie because box-office revenue outcomes do not converge to an average: revenues diverge over all scales. The studio model of risk management lacks a foundation in theory or evidence, and revenue forecasts have zero precision. Movies are complex products and the cascade of information among film-goers during the course of a film's run can evolve along so many paths that it is impossible to attribute the success of a movie to individual causal factors. The audience makes a movie a hit and no amount of “star power” or marketing can alter that. The real star is the movie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, S. (1998) “Movie Stars and the Distribution of Financially Successful Films in the Motion Picture Industry”. Journal of Cultural Economics 22(4): 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. and Harrison, A.J. (1978) Distribution of Personal Wealth in Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I. (1992) “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades”. Journal of Political Economy 100(5): 992–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, M.A. (1988) “Auctions with Constrained Information: Blind Bidding for Motion Pictures”. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(2): 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, D.C. (1996) “Continuous Degrees of Residual Claimancy: Some Contractual Evidence”. Applied Economics Letters 3(11): 739–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, D.C. (1997) “Profit-Sharing Versus Fixed-Payment Contracts: Evidence from the Motion Pictures Industry”. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 13(1): 169–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.H. and Cox, R.A.K. (1994) “A Stochastic Model of Superstardom: An Application of the Yule Distribution”. Review of Economics and Statistics 76(4): 771–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cones, J.W. (1997) The Feature Film Distribution Deal. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M. (1997) The Movie Game: The Film Business in Britain, Europe and America. Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A.S. (1997) “Complexity in the Movies”, in Complexity: The Journal of the Santa Fe Institute, (forthcoming).

  • De Vany, A.S. and Eckert, R. (1991) “Motion Picture Antitrust: The Paramount Cases Revisited”. Research in Law and Economics 14: 51–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A.S. and Walls, W.D. (1996) “Bose–Einstein Dynamics and Adaptive Contracting in the Motion Picture Industry”. The Economic Journal 439(106): 1493–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A.S. and Walls, W.D. (1997) “The Market for Motion Pictures: Rank, Revenue and Survival”. Economic Inquiry 4(35): 783–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A.S. and Walls, W.D. (1999) “Screen Wars, Star Wars, and the Blockbuster Strategy: Turbulent Information Cascades at the Box Office”. Working Paper, University of California at Irvine.

  • Fama, E. (1963) “Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis”. Journal of Business 36(4): 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, W. (1983) Adventures in the Film Trade. Warner Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L.C. (1991) “How Robust is Robust Regression?” Stata Technical Bulletin 2: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. and Woodrofe, M. (1975) “Stronger Forms of Zipf' Law”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70(349): 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H.A. (1971) “Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Business Firm Concentration”. Journal of Political Economy 79(2): 314–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H.A. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Size of Business Firms. North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, R.W. and Klein, B. (1983) “The Economics of Block Booking”. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 497–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. (1975) “The Illusion of Control”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 311–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (1998) “Bose–Einstein Dynamics in the Motion Picture Industry Revisited”. Mimeo, Economics Department, University of California at Irvine.

  • Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. (1993) “The Myopia of Learning”. Strategic Management Journal 14: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. and Soloman, S. (1998) “Of Wealth Power and Law: The Origin of Scaling in Economics”. Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University.

  • Lukk, T. (1997) Movie Marketing: Opening the Picture and Giving It Legs. Silman-James Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1963) “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices”. Journal of Business 36: 394-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna, R.N. and Stanley, H.E. (1995) “Scaling in Financial Markets”. Nature 376: 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1897) Cours d'Economique Politique.

  • Prag, J. and Cassavant, J. (1994) “An Empirical Study of Determinants of Revenues and Marketing Expenditures in the Motion Picture Industry” Journal of Cultural Economics 18(3): 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presson, P.K. and Benassi, V.A. (1996) “Illusion of Control: A Meta-Analytic Review”. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 11(3): 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, S.A. (1998) “Information, Blockbusters and Stars: A Study of the Film Industry”. Working paper, New York University.

  • Rosen, S. (1981) “The Economics of Superstars”. American Economic Review 71: 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, H.L. (1990) Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W.T., Seigerman, A., and Holbrook, M.B. (1993) “The Role of Actors and Actresses in the Success of Films: How Much is a Movie Star Worth?” Journal of Cultural Economics 17(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, W.D. (1997) “Increasing Returns to Information: Evidence from the Hong Kong Movie Market”. Applied Economics Letters 4(5): 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, W.D. (1998) “Product survival at the cinema: Evidence from Hong Kong”. Applied Economics Letters 5(4): 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (1998) “Profit-Sharing Contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and Analysis”. Journal of Legal Studies 27(1): 67–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vany, A., Walls, W.D. Uncertainty in the Movie Industry: Does Star Power Reduce the Terror of the Box Office?. Journal of Cultural Economics 23, 285–318 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007608125988

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007608125988

Navigation