Ambiguous Communication of Sexual Intentions as a Risk Marker of Sexual Aggression
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Three studies are reported that explored the role of ambiguous communication of sexual intentions as a risk factor for sexual aggression and victimization. Two main forms of ambiguous communication were distinguished: token resistance (saying “no” when you mean “yes”) and compliance (saying “yes” when you mean “no”). Two samples of heterosexual men and women and a sample of homosexual men with a total N of 1284 completed a measure of sexual victimization or aggression and indicated whether or not they had ever shown token resistance or compliance in a sexual encounter. Moreover, the heterosexual male respondents indicated whether they had ever perceived token resistance or compliance in a female partner. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the risk of experiencing sexual victimization was significantly increased as a function of token resistance. Two of the three studies also showed compliance to be a risk factor for sexual victimization. For the male respondents, token resistance was consistently linked to a higher likelihood of perpetrating sexually aggressive acts in the three studies. Perceived compliance was also found to increase the risk of sexual aggression in three of four analyses. Support for a link between perceived token resistance and sexual aggression was found in the first study only. Overall, the findings suggest that the use of ambiguous communication in negotiating sexual encounters is associated with an increased risk of sexual victimization as well as perpetration of sexually aggressive acts in both heterosexual and homosexual contacts. The implications of the findings are discussed with respect to the issue of rape prevention.
- Abbey, A. (1991). Misperception as an antecedent of acquaintance rape: A consequence of ambiguity in communication between women and men. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.).Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp.96–111). New York: Wiley.
- Bochow, M. (1997). Schwule Männer und AIDS [Gay men and AIDS]. Bonn: Deutsche AIDSHilfe e.V.
- Breitenbecher, K. H., & Scarce, M. (1999). A longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of a sexual assault education program.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 459–478.
- Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1995). Einfluss neuer gesetzlicher Regelungen auf das Verhütungsverhalten Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener [The influence of new legal regulations on the contraceptive behavior of adolescents and young adults]. Cologne: BZgA.
- Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1996). Sexualität und Kontrazeption aus der Sicht der Jugendlichen und ihrer Eltern. [Sexuality and contraception as seen by adolescents and their parents]. Cologne: BZgA.
- Bundeszentrale fü r gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1998). Sexual-und Verhütungsverhalten 16-bis 24jähriger Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener [Sexual and contraceptive behavior of 16-to 24-year-old adolescents and young adults]. Cologne: BZgA.
- Byers, S. E. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In S. E. Byers & L. F. O'sullivan(Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7–25). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
- Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168.
- Coxon, A. (1996). Between the sheets. Sexual diaries and gay men's sex in the era of AIDS. London: Cassell.
- Garcia, L. T. (1998). Perceptions of resistance to unwanted sexual advances. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 43–52.
- Gidycz, C., Coble, C. N., Latham, L., & Layman, M. J. (1993). Sexual assault experience in adulthood and prior victimization experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 151–168.
- Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault (Vol. II, pp. 245–270). New York: Garland Press.
- Harnish, R. J., Abbey, A., & DeBono, K. G. (1990). Toward an understanding of “the sex game”: The effects of gender and self-monitoring on perceptions of sexuality and likability in initial interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1333–1344.
- Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.
- Hodge, S., & Canter, D. (1998). Victims and perpetrators of male sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 222–239.
- Karabatsos, G. (1997). The sexual experiences survey. Interpretation and validity. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1, 305–328.
- Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26, 23–35.
- Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.
- Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
- Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.
- Krahé, B. (1998). Sexual aggression among adolescents: Prevalence and predictors in a German sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 537–554.
- Krahé, B., Reimer, T., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Fritsche, I. (1999). Measuring sexual aggression: The reliability of the Sexual Experiences Survey in a German sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 91–100.
- Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Waizenhöfer, E. (1999). Sexuelle Aggression zwischen Jugendlichen: Eine Prävalenzerhebung mit Ost-West-Vergleich. [Sexual aggression among adolescents: A prevalence study including an East-West comparison]. 'Gewalt in der Gesellschaft,' 30, 165–178.
- Krahé, B., Schütze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenhöfer, E. (in press). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research.
- Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.
- Menard, S. (1995).Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A scriptbased approach. In B. R. Burleson & A. W. Kunkel (Eds.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991). Double standard/double bind: The sexual double standard and women's communications about sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 447–461.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rogers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex. New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443–463.
- Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (1997). Predicting men's perceptions of date rape using the heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 25–32.
- O'sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1994). Disassembling a stereotype: Gender differences in the use of token resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1035–1055.
- O'sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234–243.
- Pan, H. S., Neidig, P. H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Predicting mild and severe husband-towife physical aggression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 975–981.
- Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date.Gender and Society, 3, 258–268.
- Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts.Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.
- Shotland, R. L., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Women's “token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 226–236.
- Sprecher, S., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse: College students' dating experiences in three countries. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 125–132.
- Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.
- Ambiguous Communication of Sexual Intentions as a Risk Marker of Sexual Aggression
Volume 42, Issue 5-6 , pp 313-337
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors