Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a general framework for modelling adaptive trait dynamics in which we integrate various concepts and techniques from modern ESS-theory. The concept of evolutionarily singular strategies is introduced as a generalization of the ESS-concept. We give a full classification of the singular strategies in terms of ESS-stability, convergence stability, the ability of the singular strategy to invade other populations if initially rare itself, and the possibility of protected dimorphisms occurring within the singular strategy's neighbourhood. Of particular interest is a type of singular strategy that is an evolutionary attractor from a great distance, but once in its neighbourhood a population becomes dimorphic and undergoes disruptive selection leading to evolutionary branching. Modelling the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree can thus be considered as a major application of the framework. A haploid version of Levene's ‘soft selection’ model is developed as a specific example to demonstrate evolutionary dynamics and branching in monomorphic and polymorphic populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P.A. and Matsuda, H. (1996) Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution. Evol. Ecol. 10, 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P.A., Harada, Y. and Matsuda, H. (1993a) On the relationship between quantitative genetic and ESS models. Evolution 47, 982–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. and Harada, Y. (1993b) Evolutionary unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7, 465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkau, B.J. and Feldman, M.W. (1973) Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74, 171–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D.T. and Cannings, C. (1978) A generalised war of attrition. J. Theor. Biol. 70, 85–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1996) Coevolution and community organization in three habitats. Oikos 75, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Pavlovic, N.B. (1992) Evolution in heterogeneous environments: Effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol. 6, 360–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Vincent, T.L. (1987) Coevolution as an evolutionary game. Evolution 41, 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Vincent, T.L. (1992) Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution 46, 1269–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. (1990) Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution 44, 520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.B. (1991) On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat. 138, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.B. and Loeschcke, V. (1980) Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition. I. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects. Theor. Pop. Biol. 18, 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.B. and Loeschcke, V. (1987) Evolution and intraspecific competition. III. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects and multidimensional resource qualities. Theor. Pop. Biol. 31, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Meeûs, T., Michalakis, Y., Renaud, F. and Olivieri, I. (1993) Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation: Soft and hard selection models. Evol. Ecol. 7, 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, H. and Antonovics, J. (1973) Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence. Am. Nat. 107, 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann, U. and Law, R. (1996) The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34, 579–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann, U., Marrow, P. and Law, R. (1995) Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: Population dynamics and the Red Queen. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 91–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, S.R. and Bush, G.L. (1989) The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In Speciation and Its Consequences (D. Otte and J.A. Endler, eds), pp. 345–365. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I. (1983) Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol. 103, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I. (1991) Game theory and population dynamics in complex genetical systems: The role of sex in short term and long term evolution. In Game Equilibrium Models I: Evolution and Game Dynamics (R. Selten, ed.), pp. 6–28. Springer, Berlin.

  • Eshel, I. (1996) On the changing concept of evolutionary population stability as a reflection of a changing point of view in the quantitative theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34, 485–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I. and Feldman, M. (1982) On evolutionary stability of the sex ratio. Theor. Pop. Biol. 21, 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I. and Feldman, M. (1984) Initial increase of new mutants and some continuity properties of ESS in two-locus systems. Am. Nat. 124, 631–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I. and Motro, U. (1981) Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help. Theor. Pop. Biol. 19, 420–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1981) Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35, 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriere, R. and Gatto, M. (1995). Lyapunov exponents and the mathematics of invasion in oscillatory or chaotic populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 48, 126–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliddon, C. and Strobeck, C. (1975) Necessary and sufficient conditions for multiple-niche polymorphism in haploids. Am. Nat. 109, 233–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P. (1996) Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34, 511–532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P. and Selten, R. (1993) Evolutionary game theory. In Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications (R.J. Aumann and S. Hart, eds). North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  • Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (1990) Adaptive dynamics and evolutionary stability. Appl. Math. Lett. 3, 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisdi, É. and Meszéna, G. (1993) Density dependent life history evolution in fluctuating environments. In Adaptation in a Stochastic Environment (C.W. Clark and J. Yoshimura, eds). Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 98, 26–62.

  • Kisdi, é. and Meszéna, G. (1995) Life history with lottery competition in a stochastic environment: ESSs which do not prevail. Theor. Pop. Biol. 47, 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H. (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one niche is available. Am. Nat. 87, 331–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. and Levins, R. (1964) Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 51, 1207–1210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, P., Law, R. and Cannings, C. (1992) The coevolution of predator-prey interactions: ESSs and Red Queen dynamics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 250, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, P., Dieckmann, U. and Law, R. (1996) Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: An ecological perspective. J. Math. Biol. 34, 556–578.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matessi, C. and Di Pasquale, C. (1996) Long term evolution of multi-locus traits. J. Math. Biol. 34, 613–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H. and Abrams, P.A. (1994) Timid consumers: Self-extinction due to adaptive change in foraging and anti-predator effort. Theor. Pop. Biol. 45, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1966) Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. and Price, G.R. (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meszéna, G., Czibula, I. and Geritz, S.A.H. (in press) Adaptive dynamics in a 2-patch environment: A toy model for allopatric and parapatric speciation. Journal of Biological Systems.

  • Metz, J.A.J., Nisbet, R. and Geritz, S.A.H. (1992) How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 198–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. and Van Heerwaarden, J.S. (1996) Adaptive dynamics: A geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S.J. van Strien and S.M. Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183–231. North-Holland, Elsevier.

  • Motro, U. (1994) Evolutionary and continuous stability in asymmetric games with continuous strategy sets: The parental investment conflict as an example. Am. Nat. 144, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylius, S.D. and Diekmann, O. (1995) On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos 74, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D.A., Wilson, H.B. and McGlade, J.M. (1994) Dynamics and evolution: Evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 343, 261–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, J. (1985) Intraspecific resource competition as a cause of sympatric speciation. In Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith (P.J. Greenwood, P.H. Harvey and M. Slatkin, eds), pp. 43–53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobeck, C. (1979) Haploid selection with n alleles in m niches. Am. Nat. 113, 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taper, M.L. and Case, T.J. (1992) Models of character displacement and the theoretical robustness of taxon cycles. Evolution 46, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. (1989) Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection. Theor. Pop. Biol. 36, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tienderen, P. and De Jong, G. (1986) Sex ratio under the haystack model: Polymorphism may occur. J. Theor. Biol. 122, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T.L. and Brown, J.S. (1989) The evolutionary response of systems to a changing environment. Appl. Math. Comput. 32, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissing, F.J. (1996) Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: Can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective? J. Math. Biol. 34, 533–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geritz, S., Kisdi, E., Mesze´NA, G. et al. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 35–57 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554906681

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554906681

Navigation