Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 227–245

Assessing Landscape Condition Relative to Water Resources in the Western United States: A Strategic Approach

  • K. Bruce Jones
  • Daniel T. Heggem
  • Timothy G. Wade
  • Anne C. Neale
  • Donald W. Ebert
  • Maliha S. Nash
  • Megan H. Mehaffey
  • Karl A. Hermann
  • Anthony R. Selle
  • Scott Augustine
  • Iris A. Goodman
  • Joel Pedersen
  • David Bolgrien
  • J. Max Viger
  • Dean Chiang
  • Cindy J. Lin
  • Yehong Zhong
  • Joan Baker
  • Rick D. Van Remortel
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1006448400047

Cite this article as:
Jones, K.B., Heggem, D.T., Wade, T.G. et al. Environ Monit Assess (2000) 64: 227. doi:10.1023/A:1006448400047

Abstract

The Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) is proposing an ambitious agenda to assess the status of streams and estuaries in a 12-State area of the western United States by the end of 2003. Additionally, EMAP is proposing to access landscape conditions as they relate to stream and estuary conditions across the west. The goal of this landscape project is to develop a landscape model that can be used to identify the relative risks of streams and estuaries to potential declines due to watershed-scale, landscape conditions across the west. To do so, requires an understanding of quantitative relationships between landscape composition and pattern metrics and parameters of stream and estuary conditions. This paper describes a strategic approach for evaluating the degree to which landscape composition and pattern influence stream and estuary condition, and the development and implementation of a spatially-distributed, landscape analysis approach.

landscape ecologywatershed analysislandscape metricswater quality

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Bruce Jones
    • 1
  • Daniel T. Heggem
    • 1
  • Timothy G. Wade
    • 1
  • Anne C. Neale
    • 1
  • Donald W. Ebert
    • 1
  • Maliha S. Nash
    • 1
  • Megan H. Mehaffey
    • 1
  • Karl A. Hermann
    • 2
  • Anthony R. Selle
    • 2
  • Scott Augustine
    • 3
  • Iris A. Goodman
    • 1
  • Joel Pedersen
    • 4
  • David Bolgrien
    • 2
  • J. Max Viger
    • 5
  • Dean Chiang
    • 6
  • Cindy J. Lin
    • 4
  • Yehong Zhong
    • 7
  • Joan Baker
    • 8
  • Rick D. Van Remortel
    • 9
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII OfficeDenverUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region X OfficeSeattleUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX OfficeSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.ISSI CG, Inc.DenverUSA
  6. 6.ITTI CorporationSan FranciscoUSA
  7. 7.Lockheed MartinPort OrchardUSA
  8. 8.Western Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA
  9. 9.Lockheed MartinLas VegasUSA