The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective
- Lorne S. Cummings
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examines whether differences in financial performance exist for investment trusts which base their portfolio selection primarily on an ethical screen, compared to indexes which incorporate a broader spectrum of investments. Results indicate that on a risk-adjusted basis there is an insignificant difference in the financial performance of these trusts against three common market benchmarks. However as to the extent of the directional effect, there does exist slightly superior financial performance by ethical trusts against their respective industry average indexes, but an underperformance against a smaller company's index and the market as a whole. The lack of a distinct advantage in the short to medium term for applying an ethical screen, may in part be due to the recent development of ethical investments in Australia. Stronger performances by older ethical investment trusts may indicate superior returns are more likely to occur over a longer term.
- Age (The): 1994, ‘Australia: Ethics and Equities are the Twin Pillars of Some Trusts’, Melbourne Australia, December 12, p. 25.
- Anderson, J. C. and A. W. Frankle: 1980, ‘Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-Beta Portfolio Analysis’, The Accounting Review 55(3) (July), 467–479.
- Ashton, D. J.: 1990, ‘A Problem in the Detection of Superior Investment Performance’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 17(3) (Summer), 337–350.
- Australian Ethical Investment Trust & Australian Ethical Equities Trust (The): 1995, Prospectus, Koomarri Printers, Belconnen ACT, Aust.
- Australian Financial Review (The): 1996, ‘Majority of Fund Managers Beat the Benchmark – Managed Funds’, May 1, p. 47.
- Australian Stock Exchange Limited: 1994, All Ordinaries Index – Companies Handbook, October Edition.
- Belkaoui, A.: 1976, ‘The Impact of the Disclosure of the Environmental Effects of Organisational Behaviour on the Market’, Financial Management 5(4), 26–31.
- Cullis, J. G., A. Lewis and A. Winnett: 1992, ‘Paying to be Good? U.K. Ethical Investments’, Kyklos 45, 3–24.
- Cummings, L. S.: 1996, ‘Political Cost Determinants Affecting Corporate Social Disclosures within Annual Reports of Australian Public Companies’, Unpublished Masters Thesis, The Australian National University.
- Diltz, J. D.: 1995, ‘The Private Cost of Socially Responsible Investing’, Applied Financial Economics 5, 69–77.
- Etzioni, A.: 1988, The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics(The Free Press, New York).
- Fama, E. F. and K. R. French: 1993, ‘Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds’, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56.
- Fama, E. F. and K. R. French: 1996, ‘Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies’, The Journal of Finance 51(1) (March), 55–84.
- Freedman, M. and B. Jaggi: 1982, ‘Pollution Disclosures, Pollution Performance and Economic Performance’, Omega 10, 167–176.
- Freidman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine(Sept 13).
- Guy, J. R.: 1978, ‘The Performance of the British Investment Trust Industry’, The Journal of Finance 33(2) (May), 443–455.
- Ingram, R. W.: 1978, ‘An Investigation of the Information Content of (Certain) Social Responsibility Disclosures’, Journal of Accounting Research(Autumn), 270–285.
- Ingram, R. W. and K. B. Frazier: 1983, ‘Narrative Disclosures and Annual Reports’, Journal of Business Research 11, 49–60.
- Jensen, C. M.: 1969, ‘Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolio's’, Journal of Business 42(9), 167–247.
- Levis, M.: 1988, ‘Size Related Anomalies and Trading Activity of U.K. Institutional Investors’, in E. Dimson (ed.), Stock Market Anomalies(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
- Luther, R. G., J. Matatko and D. C. Corner: 1992, ‘The Investment Performance of U.K. “Ethical” Unit Trusts’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 5(4), 57–70.
- Luther, R. G. and J. Matatko: 1994, ‘The Performance of Ethical Unit Trusts: Choosing an Appropriate Benchmark’, British Accounting Review 26, 77–89.
- Mallin, C. A., B. Saadouni and R. J. Briston: 1995, ‘The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 22(4) (June), 483–496.
- Owen, D. L.: 1990, ‘Towards a Theory of Social Investment: A Review Essay’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(3), 249–265.
- Perks, R. W., D. H. Rawlinson and L. Ingram: 1992, ‘An Exploration of Ethical Investment in the U.K.’, British Accounting Review 24(1), 43–65.
- Robson G. N.: 1986, ‘The Investment Performance of Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds in Australia for the Period 1969 to 1978’, Accounting and Finance(November), 55–79.
- Sharpe, W. F.: 1966, ‘Mutual Fund Performance’, Journal of Business 39, 119–138.
- Spicer, B. H.: 1978, ‘Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies' Pollution Control Records’, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 5, 67–83.
- Treynor, J.: 1965, ‘How to Rate Management of Investment Funds’, Harvard Business Review 43(1) ( Jan/Feb), 63–75.
- Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540–557.
- Vance, S. C.: 1976, ‘Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?’, Management Review 64(8), 19–24.
- The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 25, Issue 1 , pp 79-92
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, 2109, New South Wales, Australia