Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach
- Moses L. Pava
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Increasingly many business practitioners and academics are turning to religious sources as a way of approaching and answering difficult questions related to business ethics. There now exists a relatively large literature which attempts to integrate business decisions and religious values. The integration, however, is not without difficulties. For many, religious ethics provides the basis and the ultimate authority for a morally meaningful life. Yet, at the same time, in certain contexts, it is often inappropriate to rely and to publicly justify action on the basis of these ethics. With this difficulty in mind, the main goal of this paper is to answer the following specific question: Is a religiously grounded business ethics consistent with the idea of political liberalism? While this question is fundamental and straight-forward, to date it has received little, if any, careful attention. The characterization of business corporations as quasi-public, discussed in the body of the paper, implies that political liberalism may dictate that there exist situations in which invoking religious business ethics is inappropriate. The point is that once one removes the assumption of business as a purely private matter, the justification of a religiously grounded ethics in the context of a politically liberal democracy becomes problematic. On the other hand, such an assumption should not be taken to imply that all religiously grounded business ethics are always inappropriate. As this paper demonstrates, it is far from obvious that even government officials need observe a complete separation between religion and state in formulating, justifying, or expressing public policies, even policies leading to so-called coercive results. If so, it follows that managers of quasi-public institutions may, under appropriate and limited circumstances, invoke and rely upon a religious, albeit private, world-view.
- Audi, Robert: 1989 (summer), ‘The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 259–296.
- Audi, Robert: 1991 (winter), ‘Religious Commitment and Secular Reason: A Reply to Professor Weithman’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, 66–76.
- Becker, Gary: 1976, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).
- Bowie, Norman E.: 1991, ‘Challenging the Egoistic Paradigm’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 1–21.
- De George, Richard T.: 1986, ‘Theological Ethics and Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 421–432.
- Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
- Dowie, Mark: 1977 (Sep-Oct), ‘Pinto Madness’, Mother Jones,18, 20.
- Drucker, P. F.: 1989, The New Realities: In Government and Politics/ In Economics and Business/In Society and World View(Harper and Row, Publishers, New York).
- Dworkin, Ronald: 1985, A Matter of Principle(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
- Ewing, David: 1995, ‘An Employee Bill of Rights’, first printed 1977, reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 257–263.
- Evan, William M. and R. Edward Freeman: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, first printed 1988, reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E.
- Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 145–154.
- Frederick, William C., James E. Post and Keith Davis: 1992, Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics, Seventh Edition (McGraw Hill, New York).
- Friedman, Milton: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
- Friedman, Milton: 1970 (Sep 13), ‘A Friedman Doctrine - The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 32–33, and 123–125.
- Friedman Milton and Rose Friedman: 1980, Free to Choose(Avon Books, New York).
- Fromm, Erich: 1955, The Sane Society(Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
- Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–74.
- Goodpaster, Kenneth E.: 1994, ‘In Defense of a Paradox’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 423–429.
- Greenawalt, Kent: 1988 Religious Convictions and Political Choice(Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford).
- Greenawalt, Kent: 1990, ‘Religious Convictions and Political Choice: Some Further Thoughts’, Depaul Law Review 39,1019–1046.
- Gutmann, Amy: 1993, ‘The Challenge of Multi-culturalism in Political Ethics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(3), 171–205.
- Hartman, David: 1978, Joy and Responsibility: Israel, Modernity and the Renewal of Judaism(Ben-Zwi-Ponser and The Shalom Harman Institute, Jerusalem).
- Herberg, Will: 1951, Judaism and Modern Man(Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, Inc., New York).
- Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1951, The Sabbath: Its Meaning for Modern Man(Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).
- Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1955, God in Search of Man: A Philosophy of Judaism(Harper and Row Publishers, New York).
- Heschel, Abraham Joshua: 1965, Who is Man? (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
- Hoffman, Michael: 1995, ‘The Ford Pinto’, in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick (eds.), Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 552–558.
- King, Martin Luther: 1986, ‘Letter From Birmingham City Jail’, first printed April 1963, reprinted in A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings of Martin Luther King, Jr.edited by James Melvin Washington (Harper & Row, Publishers, San Francisco).
- Levine, Aaron and Moses L. Pava: 1999, Jewish Business Ethics: The Firm and Its Stakeholders( Jason Aronson, Inc., Northvale, NJ).
- Pava, Moses L.: 1998, ‘Religious Business Ethics As Interpretation: A Jewish Perspective’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 10, 9–29.
- Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
- Rawls, John: 1993, Political Liberalism(Columbia University Press, New York).
- Soloveitchik, Joseph B.: 1965, The Lonely Man of Faith(Doubleday, New York).
- Soloveitchik, Joseph B: 1967, ‘Confrontation’, in A Treasury of “Tradition”,Edited by Norman Lamm and Walter S. Wurzburger (Hebrew Publishing Co., New York), pp. 55–80.
- Soloveitchik, Joseph B: 1983, Halakhic Man(Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia).
- Solum, Lawrence B: 1990, ‘Faith and Justice’, Depaul Law Review 39,1083–1106.
- Stone, Christopher: 1995, ‘Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior’, first printed in 1975, Reprinted in W. Michael Hoffman and Robert E. Frederick, Business Ethics(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 141–145.
- Weber, Leonard J.: 1996, ‘Citizenship and Democracy: The Ethics of Corporate Lobbying’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2), 253–259.
- Weithman, Paul J.: 1991 (Winter), ‘The Separation of Church and State: some Questions for Professor Audi’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 20,52–65.
- Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 17, Issue 15 , pp 1633-1652
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors