Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications
- Geoff Moore
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The debate concerning corporate moral agency is normally conducted through philosophical arguments in articles which argue from only one point of view. This paper summarises both the arguments for and against corporate moral agency and concludes from this that the arguments in favour have more weight. The paper also addresses the way in which the law in the U.K. and the U.S.A. currently views this issue and shows how it is supportive of the concept of corporate moral agency. The paper concludes by considering the implications of the debate for business ethics in general, and stakeholder theory and virtue ethics in particular.
- Card, Cross and Jones: 1995, Criminal Law (Butterworth & Co., Oxford, 13th edition).
- Collier, J: 1995, 'The Virtuous Organisation', Business Ethics - A European Review 4(3), 143–149.
- Corlett, J. A.: 1988, 'French on Corporate Punishment: Some Problems', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 205–210.
- Corlett, J. A.: 1992, 'Collective Punishment and Public Policy', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 207–216.
- Danley, J. R.: 1980, 'Corporate Moral Agency: The Case for Anthropological Bigotry', Action and Responsibility: Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 2, and quoted in Hoffman, W. M. and R. E. Frederick: 1995, Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 183–189. (Page numbers are from this version.)
- Ewin, R. E.: 1991, 'The Moral Status of the Corporation', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 749–756.
- French, P. A.: 1979, 'The Corporation as a Moral Person', American Philosophical Quarterly 16(3), 207–215.
- French, P. A.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (Columbia University Press, New York).
- French, P. A.: 1995, Corporate Ethics (Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, Dallas).
- Friedman, M.: 1970, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits (New York Times).
- Garrett, J. E.: 1989, 'Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 535–545.
- Goodpaster, K. E. and J. B. Matthews: 1982, 'Can a Corporation Have a Conscience?' Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb and quoted as excerpts in Desjardins, J. R. and J. J. McCall: 1985, Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics (Wadsworth, California) pp 104–113. (Page numbers are from this version.)
- Goodpaster, K. E.: 1983, 'The Concept of Corporate Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 2, 1–22.
- Goodpaster, K. E.: 1987, 'The Principle of Moral Projection', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 329–332.
- Harris, P.: An Introduction to Law, 5th edition (Butterworth, London).
- Hoffman, J. B.: 1986, 'What is Necessary for Corporate Moral Excellence?', Journal of Business Ethics 5, 233–242.
- Ladd, J.: 1970, 'Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organisations', The Monist, and quoted as excerpts in Donaldson T. and P. Werhane (ed.): 1988, Ethical Issues in Business, A Philosophical Approach (Prentice Hall, New Jersey). (Page numbers are from this version.)
- Laufer, W. S.: 1996, 'Corporate Culpability and the Limits of the Law', Business Ethics Quarterly 6(3), 311–324.
- Manning, R. C.: 1984, 'Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood', Journal of Business Ethics 3, 77–84.
- Manning, R. C.: 1988, 'Dismemberment, Divorce and Hostile Takeovers: A Comment on Corporate Moral Personhood', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 639–643.
- Mayson, S. W. and D. French: 1997, Company Law (Blackstone Press Ltd., London).
- McMahon, C.: 1995, 'The Ontological and Moral Status of Organisations', Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3), 541–554.
- Moore, G.: 1998, 'Stakeholders versus Shareholders: An Empirical or a Normative Dispute?', in Wood, G. (ed.): 1998, Corporate Social Responsibility: Principles and Practice (University of Salford, Salford, U.K.).
- Ozar, D. T.: 1985, 'Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 277–281.
- Pfeiffer, R. S.: 1990, 'The Central Distinction in the Theory of Corporate Moral Personhood', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 473–480.
- Phillips, M. J.: 1995, 'Corporate Moral Responsibility: When it Might Matter', Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3), 555–576.
- Ranken, N.: 1987, 'Corporations as Persons: Objections to Goodpaster's “Principle of Moral Projection”', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 633–637.
- Solomon, R. C.: 1992, Ethics and Excellence, Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).
- Velasquez, M. G.: 1985, Why Corporations are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do, in Desjardins, J. R. and J. J. McCall: 1985, Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics (Wadsworth, California), pp 114–125. (Page numbers are from this version.)
- Warren, R.: 1997, 'Corporate Punishment: Is Shame Enough? Turner and Newall and the Asbestos Crisis', in Moore, G. (ed.): 1997, Business Ethics: Principles and Practice (Business Education Publishers Ltd, Sunderland, U.K.).
- Welby, J.: 1992, Can Companies Sin? 'Whether',i'How' and 'Who' in Company Accountability (Grove Books Ltd., Nottingham, U.K.).
- Werhane, P.: 1989, 'Corporate and Individual Moral Responsibility: A Reply to Jan Garrett', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 821–822.
- Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 21, Issue 4 , pp 329-343
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Geoff Moore (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Newcastle Business School, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom