The individual economic well-being of Native American men and women during the 1980s: A decade of moving backwards
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The study examines whether the income opportunities of Native Americans over the 1980s improved in response to stronger aggregate job growth or deteriorated in response to declining wage and employment opportunities, particularly for the less-skilled. Using data from the 1980 and 1990 US Census on individuals aged 16–64, a methodology is presented to analyze the effect of changes in the income distributions of Native Americans and whites on the average Native American-white income ratio. Oaxaca-type decompositions are also used to yield insights into the role of economy-wide as opposed to Native American-specific effects on changes in income, hourly earnings and annual hours employed over the period. The study concludes that the economic circumstances of Native American men and women further deteriorated relative to whites over the decade, chiefly due to the declining valuation given to Native American human capital, particularly for men. An important finding of the study is the role of economy-wide vis-à-vis native-specific effects: almost all of the adverse movements in average hourly earnings against Native Americans can be attributed to changes in economy-wide hourly earnings structures (with the least-skilled being paid less), whereas the large fall in relative annual hours is due to changes specific to Native Americans.
- Blau, F.D. & Kahn, L.M. (1994). Rising wage inequality andthe US gender gap, The American Economic Review 84(2): 23–22.
- Dickens, W. & Katz, L. (1987). Inter-industry wage differences andindustry characteristics, pp. 48–89, in K. Lang & J. Leonard (eds.), Unemployment and the structure of labor markets. New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Freeman, R.B. & Katz, L.F. (1995). Rising wage inequality: The UnitedStates versus other advanced countries, pp. 29–62, in R.B. Freeman (ed.),Working under different rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Gregory, R.G. & Daly, A.E. (1994). Welfare and economic progress ofindigenous men of Australia and the US, 1980–1990. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper 318.
- Juhn, C., Murphy, K.M. & Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the risein returns to skill, Journal of Political Economy 101(3): 410–442.
- Katz, L.F. & Murphy, K.M. (1992). Changes in relative wages 1963–87:Supply and demand factors, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 35–78.
- Levitan, S.A. & Miller, E.I. (1991). The equivocal prospects for Indianreservations. Washington, DC: Centre for Social Policy Studies, The George Washington University.
- Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: NationalBureau of Economic Research.
- Murphy, K. & Welch, F. (1992). The structure of wages, QuarterlyJournal of Economics 107(1): 215–326.
- Oaxaca, J.R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labour markets,International Economic Review 14: 693–709.
- Okun, A.M. (1973). 1973 Upward mobility in a high-pressure economy, pp.207–261, in A.M. Okun & G.L. Perry (eds.), Economic activity, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
- Passel, J.S. & Berman, P.A. (1986). Quality of 1980 census data for American Indians, Social Biology 33: 163–182.
- Sandefur, G.D. & Scott, W.J. (1983). Minority group status and the wages of Indian and black males, Social Science Research 12: 44–68.
- The individual economic well-being of Native American men and women during the 1980s: A decade of moving backwards
Population Research and Policy Review
Volume 16, Issue 1-2 , pp 115-145
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Native Americans
- American Indians
- Income inequality
- Wage inequality
- Industry Sectors