Are There Algorithms That Discover Causal Structure?
- David FreedmanAffiliated withDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley
- , Paul HumphreysAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy, University of Virginia
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There have been many efforts to infer causation from association byusing statistical models. Algorithms for automating this processare a more recent innovation. In Humphreys and Freedman[(1996) British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 113–123] we showed that one such approach, by Spirtes et al., was fatally flawed. Here we put our arguments in a broader context and reply to Korb and Wallace [(1997) British Journal for thePhilosophy of Science 48, 543–553] and to Spirtes et al.[(1997) British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 555–568]. Their arguments leave our position unchanged: claims to have developed a rigorous engine for inferring causation from association are premature at best, the theorems have no implications for samples of any realistic size, and the examples used to illustrate the algorithms are indicative of failure rather than success. The gap between association and causation has yet to be bridged.
- Are There Algorithms That Discover Causal Structure?
Volume 121, Issue 1-2 , pp 29-54
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors