Skip to main content
Log in

Culture, Biology, and Evolution: The Mead–Freeman Controversy Revisited

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derek Freeman argues that the central issue in the Mead–Freeman controversy is evolution. He views Margaret Mead's Coming of Age in Samoa as not only misleading about Samoa but as a “sacred text” that promoted an antievolutionary paradigm among American cultural anthropologists. A review of Mead's writing on culture, biology, and evolution demonstrates that contrary to Freeman's claim, Mead favored an evolutionary approach throughout her career. Moreover, while Mead's book was a popular text and a bestseller, it was not a “sacred text” among anthropologists. Freeman's misrepresentation of the historical record concerning Mead's views and the place of Coming of Age in anthropology raises major questions about his scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Appell, G. N., and Madan, T. N. (1988). Derek Freeman: Notes toward an intellectual biography. In Appell, G. N., and Madan, T. N. (eds.), Choice and Morality in Anthropological Perspective. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnouw, V. (1979). Culture and Personality. The Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. W. (1998). Classic anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 100: 951–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, P. (1980). Continuities in Psychological Anthropology:AHistorical Introduction. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, E. (1979). Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côtè, J. E. (1994). Adolescent Storm and Stress: An Evaluation of the Mead-Freeman Controversy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côtè, J. E. (1998). Much ado about nothing: The ‘fateful hoaxing’ of Margaret Mead. Skeptical Inquirer 22(6): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C. (1991). In Search of Human Nature. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • diLeonardo, M. (1998). Exotics at Home: Anthropologies, Others, American Modernity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B., and McIntosh, J. (1997). The new creationism: Biology under attack. The Nation, June 9: 11–16.

  • Firth, R. (1936). We the Tikopia. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerstel, L., and Gilliam, A. (eds.) (1992). Confronting the Margaret Mead Legacy: Scholarship, Empire, and the South Pacific. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1980). Sociobiology: The ‘antidiscipline’ of anthropology. In Montagu, A. (ed.), Sociobiology Examined. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1981). The anthropology of choice: An ANZAAS presidential address given in Auckland, New Zealand, on 24 January, 1979. Canberra Anthropol. 4(1): 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1983a). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1983b). Inductivism and the test of truth: A rejoinder to Lowell D. Holmes and others. Canberra Anthropol. 6(2): 101–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1987). Review of Holmes 1987. J. Polynes. Soc. 96: 392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1992). Paradigms in collision: The far-reaching controversy over the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead and its significance for the human sciences. Academic Questions, Summer: 23–33.

  • Freeman, D. (1996). Margaret Mead and the Heretic: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Penguin Books, Ringwood, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1997). Paradigms in collision: Margaret Mead's mistake and what it has done to anthropology. Skeptic 5(3): 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1998). All made of fantasy: A rejoinder to Paul Shankman. Am. Anthropol. 100(4): 972–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1999a). The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: A Historical Analysis of Her Samoan Research. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1999b). On the ethics of skeptical inquiry. Skeptical Inquirer 23(3): 60, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, A. I. (1939). The child, the savage and human experience. In Proceedings of the Sixth Institute on the Exceptional Child, Woods School, Langhorne, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1983). The sleep-crawling question. Psychol. Today, May: 24–27.

  • Hays, T. E. (1997). Sacred texts and introductory texts: The case of Mead's Samoa. Pacif. Stud. 20: 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, J. M. (1997). The Most Offending Soul Alive: Tom Harrisson and His Remarkable Life. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, G., and Leavitt, S. C. (eds.) (1998). Adolescence in Pacific Islands Societies. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honigmann, J. J. (1967). Personality in Culture. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F. L. K. (1961). Psychological Anthropology. The Dorsey Press, Inc., Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F. L. K. (1972). Psychological Anthropology, (New Ed.). Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F. L. K. (1980). Margaret Mead and psychological anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 82: 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. (ed.) (1961). Studying Personality Cross-Culturally. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardiner, A., Linton, R., DuBois, C., and West, J. (1945). The Psychological Frontiers of Society. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A. (1973). Culture, Behavior, and Personality. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutkehaus, N. C. (1995). Margaret Mead and the “rustling-of-the-wind-in-the-palm trees school” of ethnographic writing. In Behar, R., and Gordon, D. A. (eds.), Women Writing Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 186–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, N. (1984). Review of Margaret Mead and Samoa. Pacif. Stud. 4: 99–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. William Morrow & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1930). Social organization of Manu'a. In Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin (Vol. 76). Honolulu.

  • Mead, M. (1935). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (ed.) (1937) Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive Peoples. Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1942). Anthropological data on the problem of instinct. Psychosom. Med. 4: 396, 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1947). On the implications for anthropology of the Gesell-Ilg approach to maturation. Am. Anthropol. 49: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1949). Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. William Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1950). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. William Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1958). Cultural determinants of behavior. In Roe, A., and Simpson, G. G. (eds.), Behavior and Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1961). Anthropology among the sciences. Am. Anthropol. 63: 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1964). Continuities in Cultural Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1976). Towards a human science. Science 191(4230): 903–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. E. (1996). Communicating culture: Margaret Mead and the practice of popular anthropology. In MacClancy, J., and McDonaugh, C. (eds.), Popularizing Anthropology. Routledge, New York, pp. 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1934). On Primitive Contemporaries. The MacMillan Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (1984). At the height of her powers: Margaret Mead's Samoa. Femin. Stud. 10: 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orans, M. (1996). Not Even Wrong: Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman, and the Samoans. Chandler and Sharp Publishers, Inc., Novato, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orans, M. (1999). Mead misrepresented. Science 283: 1649, 1650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. (1987). Letter to the editors. Sci. Am. 256: 6, 7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. (1996). Grief and mourning. In Levinson, D., and Ember, M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology. Henry Holt, New York, pp. 548–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1979). Cannibalism: An exchange. New York Review of Books, March 22: 46, 47.

  • Sanday, P. (1981). The sociocultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. J. Soc. Issues 37(4): 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, A. (1991). Status, property, and the value on virginity. Am. Ethnol. 18: 719–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, A., and Barry III, H. (1991). Adolescence: An Anthropological Inquiry. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1983). The Samoan conundrum. Canberra Anthropol. 6(1): 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1996). The history of Samoan sexual conduct and the Mead-Freeman controversy. Am. Anthropol. 98(3): 555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1998a). Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman, and the issue of evolution. Skeptical Inquirer 22(6): 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1998b). All things considered: A reply to Derek Freeman. Am. Anthropol. 100(4): 977–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, G. D. (ed.) (1978). The Making of Psychological Anthropology. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Palmer, C. (1999). A Natural History of Rape: The Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. R. (1972). Introduction to Socialization: Human Culture Transmitted. C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1962). Culture and Personality. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1972). Culture and Personality (2nd Ed.). Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D. (1996). The Heretic. Penguin Books, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1994). Naturalist. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shankman, P. Culture, Biology, and Evolution: The Mead–Freeman Controversy Revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 29, 539–556 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005166129554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005166129554

Keywords

Navigation