Chomsky On The ‘Ordinary Language’ View Of Language
- Francis Y. LinAffiliated withSomerville College
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is a common-sense view of language, which is held by Wittgenstein, Strawson Dummett, Searle, Putnam, Lewis, Wiggins, and others. According to this view a language consists of conventions, it is rule-governed, rules are conventionalised, a language is learnt, there are general learning mechanisms in the brain, and so on. I shall call this view the ‘ordinary language’ view of language. Chomsky’s attitude towards this view of language has been rather negative, and his rejection of it is a major motivation for the development of his own theory. In this paper I shall review Chomsky’s long-standing criticisms. I shall show that (1)Chomsky’s argument does not constitute a dismissal of the ‘ordinarylanguage’ view of language, (2) Chomsky’s conclusions about language do not follow from his argument, and (3) the ‘ordinary language’ view actually points to a promising way for us to understand the true nature of language and mind.
- Chomsky On The ‘Ordinary Language’ View Of Language
Volume 120, Issue 2 , pp 151-191
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Francis Y. Lin (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Somerville College, Oxford, OX2 6HD, U.K.