Allais, M. (1953), Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique de postulats et axiomes de l'école américaine, *Econometrica*21, 503–546.

Azipurua, J.M., Ishiishi, T., Nieto, J. and Uriarte, J.R. (1993), Similarity and preferences in the space of simple lotteries, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*6: 289–297.

Bell, D.E. (1982), Regret in decision making under uncertainty, *Operations Research*30: 961–981.

Buschena, D.E. (1993), The effects of alternative similarity on choice under risk: toward a plausible explanation of independence violations of the expected utility model, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Buschena, D.E. and Zilberman, D. (1995), Performance of the similarity hypothesis relative to existing models of risky choice, *Journal of Risk and Uncertaint*11, 233–262.

Buschena, D.E. and Zilberman, D. (1997a), A comment on ‘Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data’, by J.D. Hey and C. Orme. Working paper.

Buschena, D.E. and Zilberman, D. (1997b), Predictive value of predictive value of incentives, decision difficulty, and expected utility theory for risky choices, Working paper presented at the Foundations of Uncertainty and Risk VIII Conference, Mons, Belgium, July 1997.

Camerer, C. (1989), An experimental test of several generalized utility theories, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*2: 61–104.

Conlisk, J. (1988), Optimization costs, *Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization*9, 213–228.

Conlisk, J. (1989), Three variants on the allais example, *American Economic Review*79: 392–407.

Conlisk, J. (1996),Why bounded rationality? *Journal of Economic Literature*34: 669–700.

Fishburn, P.C. (1970), Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey, *Operations Research*18: 207–228.

Fishburn, P.C. (1988), *Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory*, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Harless, D. (1992), Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: a test of variations in expected utility theory, *Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization*18: 391–414.

Harless, D. (1993), Experimental tests of prospective reference theory, *Economics Letters*43: 71–76.

Harless, D. and Camerer, C. (1994), The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories, *Econometrica*62: 1251–1290.

Heiner, R.A. (1988), Imperfect decisions in organization: toward a theory of internal structure, *Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization*9: 25–44.

Hey, J.D. and Orme, C. (1994), Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data, *Econometrica*62, 1291–1326.

Jensen, N.E. (1967), An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory, I: utility functions, *Swedish Journal of Economics*69: 163–183.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, *Econometrica*47: 263–291.

Krantz, D.H. (1967), Rational distance functions for multidimensional scaling, *Journal of Mathematical Psychology*4: 226–245.

Leland, J.W. (1994), Generalized similarity judgments: an alternative explanation for choice anomalies, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*9: 151–172.

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1982), Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, *Economic Journal*92: 805–824.

Luce, R.D. (1956), Semi-orders and a theory of utility discrimination, *Econometrica*24: 178–191.

MacCrimmon, K.R. and Larsson, S. (1979), Utility theory: axioms versus ‘Paradoxes’, in M. Allais and O. Hagen (eds.), *Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox*, Reidel, Dordrecht, 333–409.

Mellers, B.S. and Birnbaum, M.H. (1982), Loci of contextual effects in judgment: human perception and performance, *Journal of Experimental Psychology*8: 582–601.

Parducci, A. and Perrett, L.R. (1971), Category rating scales: effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus values, *Journal of Experimental PsychologyMonographs*89: 427–452.

Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1988), Adaptive strategy selection in decision making, *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*14: 534–552.

Radner, R. and Rothschild, M. (1975), On the allocation of effort, *Journal of Economic Theory*10: 253–262.

Rubinstein, A. (1988), Similarity and decision making under risk: is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox? *Journal of Economic Theory*46: 145–153.

Rumelhart, D.L. and Greeno, J.G. (1971), Similarity between stimuli: an experimental test of the luce and restle choice models, *Journal of Mathematical Psychology*8: 370–381.

Sileo, P.W. (1995), Intransitivity of indifference, strong monotonicity, and the endowment effect, *Journal of Economic Theory*66: 198–223.

Sopher, B. and Gigliotti, G. (1993), Intransitive cycles: rational choice or random error? An answer based on estimation of error with experimental data, *Theory and Decision*35: 311–336.

Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1987), Violations of the independence axiom: an experimental test of some competing hypotheses, Discussion Paper No. 24, Economics Research Centre, University of East Anglia.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992), Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*5: 297–323.

Viscusi, W.K. (1989), Prospective reference theory: toward an explanation of the paradoxes, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*2: 235–264.

von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953), *Theory of Games and Economic Behavior*, 3rd edn., Princeton University Press.

Wilcox, N.T. (1993), Lottery choice: incentives, complexity, and decision time, *Economic Journal*103: 1397–1417.