E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Ellsberg's (1961) famous paradox shows that decision-makers give events with ‘known’ probabilities a higher weight in their outcome evaluation. In the same article, Ellsberg suggests a preference representation which has intuitive appeal but lacks an axiomatic foundation. Schmeidler (1989) and Gilboa (1987) provide an axiomatisation for expected utility with non-additive probabilities. This paper introduces E-capacities as a representation of beliefs which incorporates objective information about the probability of events. It can be shown that the Choquet integral of an E-capacity is the Ellsberg representation. The paper further explores properties of this representation of beliefs and provides an axiomatisation for them.
- Anscombe, F., Aumann, R.J. (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34: pp. 199-205
- Camerer, C., Weber, M. (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: pp. 325-370
- Choquet, G. (1953) Theory of capacities. Annales Institut Fourier 5: pp. 131-295
- Denneberg, D. (1995), Extensions of measurable space and linear representation of the Choquet integral, Mathematik-ArbeitspapiereNo. 45, Universität Bremen.
- Dow, J., Werlang, S. (1992) Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60: pp. 197-204
- Dow, J., Werlang, S. (1994) Nash equilibrium under Knightian uncertainty: breaking down backward induction. Journal of Economic Theory 64: pp. 305-324
- Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D. (1996) Uncertainty aversion and dynamic consistency. International Economic Review 37: pp. 625-640
- Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D. (1996) Uncertainty aversion and preference for randomisation. Journal of Economic Theory 71: pp. 31-43
- Eichberger, J. and Kelsey, D. (1997a), Non-additive beliefs and game theory, Mimeo, Universität des Saarlandes.
- Eichberger, J. and Kelsey, D. (1997b), Signaling games with uncertainty,Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Eichberger, J. and Kelsey, D. (1997c), Free riders do not like uncertainty,Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Eichberger, J. and Kelsey, D. (1997d), Education signaling and uncertainty, Mimeo, Universität des Saarlandes.
- Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: pp. 643-669
- Epstein, L.G., LeBreton, M. (1993) Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian. Journal of Economic Theory 61: pp. 1-22
- Fishburn, P.C. (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making.. Wiley, New York
- Ghirardato, P. (1994), Coping with ignorance: unforeseen contingencies and nonadditive uncertainty,Mimeo, University of California at Berkeley.
- Gilboa, I. (1987) Expected utility theory with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16: pp. 65-88
- Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D. (1993) Updating ambiguous beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory 59: pp. 33-49
- Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D. (1994) Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral. Annals of Operations Research 52: pp. 43-65
- Haller, H. (1996), Non-additive beliefs in solvable games, Mimeo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute WP E-95-14.
- Jaffray, J.-Y. (1989) Linear utility theory for belief functions. Operations Research Letters 8: pp. 107-112
- Jaffray, J.-Y. (1992) Bayesian updating and belief functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22: pp. 1144-1152
- Klibanoff, P. (1994), Uncertainty, decision and normal form games, Mimeo, Northwestern University.
- Lo, K.C. (1996) Equilibrium in beliefs under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 71: pp. 443-484
- Machina, M.J., Schmeidler, D. (1992) A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60: pp. 745-780
- Marinacci, M. (1996), Ambiguous games, Mimeo, Northwestern University.
- Mukerji, S. (1997) Understanding the non-additive probability decision model. Economic Theory 9: pp. 23-46
- Mukerji, S. (1997b),Ambiguity aversion and uncompleteness of contractual form, American Economic Review, forthcoming.
- Saarin, R., Wakker, P. (1992) A simple axiomatisation of non-additive expected utility. Econometrica 60: pp. 1255-1272
- Savage, L. (1954) Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York
- Schmeidler, D. (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57: pp. 571-587
- Shafer, G. (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
- Shafer, G. (1990) Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 4: pp. 323-362
- Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
- E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox
Theory and Decision
Volume 46, Issue 2 , pp 107-138
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Ellsberg paradox
- Uncertainty aversion
- Choquet integral
- Non-additive probabilities
- Industry Sectors