Theory and Decision

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 107–138

E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox

Authors

  • Jürgen Eichberger
    • WirtschaftstheorieUniversität des Saarlandes
  • David Kelsey
    • Department of EconomicsThe University of Birmingham
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1004994630014

Cite this article as:
Eichberger, J. & Kelsey, D. Theory and Decision (1999) 46: 107. doi:10.1023/A:1004994630014

Abstract

Ellsberg's (1961) famous paradox shows that decision-makers give events with ‘known’ probabilities a higher weight in their outcome evaluation. In the same article, Ellsberg suggests a preference representation which has intuitive appeal but lacks an axiomatic foundation. Schmeidler (1989) and Gilboa (1987) provide an axiomatisation for expected utility with non-additive probabilities. This paper introduces E-capacities as a representation of beliefs which incorporates objective information about the probability of events. It can be shown that the Choquet integral of an E-capacity is the Ellsberg representation. The paper further explores properties of this representation of beliefs and provides an axiomatisation for them.

Ellsberg paradoxUncertainty aversionChoquet integralNon-additive probabilities
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999