Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty
 George Wu
 … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
In many realworld gambles, a nontrivial amount of time passes before the uncertainty is resolved but after a choice is made. An individual may have a preference between gambles with identical probability distributions over final outcomes if they differ in the timing of resolution of uncertainty. In this domain, utility consists not only of the consumption of outcomes, but also the psychological utility induced by an unresolved gamble. We term this utility anxiety. Since a reflective decision maker may want to include anxiety explicitly in analysis of unresolved lotteries, a multipleoutcome model for evaluating lotteries with delayed resolution of uncertainty is developed. The result is a rankdependent utility representation (e.g., Quiggin, 1982), in which period weighting functions are related iteratively. Substitution rules are proposed for evaluating compound temporal lotteries. The representation is appealing for a number of reasons. First, probability weights can be interpreted as the cognitive attention allocated to certain outcomes. Second, the model disaggregates strength of preference from temporal risk aversion and thus provides some insight into the old debate about the relationship between von Neumann–Morgenstern utility functions and strength of preference value functions.
 Aczél, J. (1966) Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York
 Aumann, R.J. (1962) Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30: pp. 445462
 Bell, D.E. Components of risk aversion. In: Brans, J.P. eds. (1981) Operational Research’ 81. Amsterdam, NorthHolland, pp. 371378
 Bell, D.E. (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research 30: pp. 961981
 Bell, D.E. (1985), Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty, Operations Research33: 1–27.
 Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H. Marginal value and intrinsic risk aversion. In: Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H., Tversky, A. eds. (1988) Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions. UK: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 384397
 Bewley, T.F. (1986), Knightian decision theory: Part I, Cowles Foundation. Discussion Paper 807.
 Camerer, C.F., Ho, T.H. (1994) Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8: pp. 167196
 Cantor, S. (1991), A decision analytic approach to prenatal diagnosis, Ph.D. Dissertation. Decision Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge.
 Hong, C.S., Karni, E., Safra, Z. (1987) Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory 42: pp. 370381
 Dréze, J., Modigliani, F. (1972) Consumption decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 3: pp. 308355
 Dyer, J., Sarin, R.K. (1982) Relative risk aversion. Management Science 28: pp. 875886
 Ellsberg, D. (1954) Classical notions of measurable utility. Economic Journal 64: pp. 528556
 Fishburn, P.C. (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making. JohnWiley, New York
 Fishburn, P.C. (1991) Nontransitive preferences in decision theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4: pp. 113134
 Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: pp. 263291
 Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives. JohnWiley, New York
 Keeney, R.L., Winkler, R. (1985) Evaluating decision strategies for equity of public risks. Operations Research 33: pp. 955970
 Koopmans, T.C. (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: pp. 287309
 Kreps, D.M. (1988) Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
 Kreps, D.M., Porteus, E.L. (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46: pp. 185200
 Loewenstein, G. (1987) Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal 97: pp. 666684
 Loomes, G., Sugden, R. (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92: pp. 805824
 Loomes, G., Sugden, R. (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies 53: pp. 271282
 Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and Decisions. John Wiley, New York
 Machina, M.J. (1984) Temporal risk and nature of induced preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 33: pp. 199231
 Machina, M.J. (1989) Dynamic consistency and nonexpected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature 27: pp. 16221668
 Markowitz, H. (1959) Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
 Marschak, J. (1950) Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica 18: pp. 111141
 Miyamoto, J.M., Wakker, P. (1996) Multiattribute utility theory without expected utility foundations. Operations Research 44: pp. 313326
 Mossin, J. (1969) A note of uncertainty and preference in a temporal context. American Economic Review 59: pp. 172174
 Pope, R. (1983), The preoutcome period and the utility of gambling, in B.P.
 Stigum and F. Wenstop (eds.), Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 137–177.
 Pratt, J.W. (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32: pp. 122136
 Prelec, D. (1990) A ‘pseudoendowment’ effect, and its implication for some recent nonexpected utility models. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: pp. 247259
 Prelec, D. (in press), The probability weighting function, Econometrica.
 Quiggin, J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: pp. 323343 CrossRef
 Raiffa, H. Back from prospect theory to utility theory. In: Grauer, M., Thompson, M., Wierzbicki, A. eds. (1986) Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, pp. 100113
 Röell, A. (1987) Risk aversion in Quiggin and Yaari's rankordermodel of choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 97: pp. 143159
 Sarin, R.K. (1982) Strength of preference and risky choice. Operations Research 30: pp. 982995
 Segal, U. (1984), Nonlinear decision weights with the independence axiom, UCLA Working Paper No. 353.
 Segal, U. (1987) Some remarks on Quiggin's anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8: pp. 145154
 Spence, M., Zeckhauser, R. (1972) The effect of the timing of consumption decisions and the resolution of lotteries on the choice of lotteries. Econometrica 40: pp. 401403
 Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a referencedependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: pp. 10391061
 Wakker, P.P. (1994) Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision 36: pp. 144
 Wu, G. (1996), Temporal risk and probability weights: rank, sign, and timing dependent utility, Harvard Business SchoolWorking Paper 92093.
 Wu, G., Gonzalez, R. (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science 42: pp. 16761690
 Yaari, M.E. (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55: pp. 95117
 Title
 Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty
 Journal

Theory and Decision
Volume 46, Issue 2 , pp 159199
 Cover Date
 19990401
 DOI
 10.1023/A:1004990410083
 Print ISSN
 00405833
 Online ISSN
 15737187
 Publisher
 Kluwer Academic Publishers
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 Decision analysis
 Risk theory
 Delayed resolution of uncertainty
 Rankdependent utility
 Stochastic stationarity
 Industry Sectors
 Authors

 George Wu ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, 1101 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA Phone