Harless,W. and Camerer, C. (1994), The predictive utility of generalised expected utility theories, *Econometrica*62: 1251–1289.

Dawes, R. (1979), The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making,

*American Psychologist*34: 571–582.

CrossRefEdwards, W. (1954), Probability-preferences among bets with differing expected value, *American Journal of Psychology*67: 56–67.

Eliashberg, J. and Hauser, J. (1985),A measurement error approach for modelling consumer risk preference, *Management Science*31: 1–23.

Fishburn, P. (1982), Nontransitive measurable utility, *Journal of Mathematical Psychology*26: 31–67.

Hey, J. and Orme, C. (1994), Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data, *Econometrica*62: 1291–1326.

Hershey, J. and Schoemaker, P. (1985), Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: are they equivalent?, *Management Science*31: 1213–1331.

Holt, C.A. (1986), Preference reversals and the independence axiom, *American Economic Review*76: 263–291.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, *Econometrica*47: 263–291.

Loomes, G., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1989), Preference reversal, information processing effect or rational non-transitive choice, *Economic Journal*99 (supplement): 140–152.

Loomes, G., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991), Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods, *Econometrica*59: 425–439.

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1982), Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, *Economic Journal*92: 805–824.

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1987), Some implications of a more general form of regret theory, *Journal of Economic Theory*41: 270–287.

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1995), incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories, *European Economic Review*39: 641–648.

Machina, M. (1982), 'Expected utility’ analysis without the independence axiom, *Econometrica*50: 277–323.

Machina, M. (1983), The economic theory of individual behaviour toward risk: theory, evidence and new directions, Technical Report No. 433, Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, Stanford University, California.

Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O. (1946), *The Adaptive Decision Maker*, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Quiggin, J. (1982), A theory of anticipated utility, *Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization*3: 323–343.

Quiggin, J. (1993), *Generalized Expected Utility Theory*, Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer.

Rubinstein, A. (1988), Similarity and decision-making under risk, *Journal of Economic Theory*46: 145–153.

Simon, H. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice, *Quarterly Journal of Economics*69: 99–118.

Schoemaker, J. and Waid, C. (1988), A probabilistic dominance measure for binary choices: analytic aspects of a multi-attribute random weights model, *Journal of Mathematical Psychology*42: 169–191.

Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991), Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences?, *American Economic Review*81: 971–979.

Tversky, A. (1969), Intransitivity of preferences, *Psychological Review*76: 31–48.

Tversky, A. (1972), Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice, *Psychological Review*79: 281–299.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.P. (1986), Rational choice and the framing of decisions, *Journal of Business*59: S251–278.

Tversky,A. and Kahneman, D.P. (1992),Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*5: 297–323.

Tversky, A., Slovic, P. and Kahneman, D. (1990), The causes of preference reversal, *American Economic Review*80: 204–217.