Unification, Reduction, and Non-Ideal Explanations
- Todd JonesAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Kitcher's unification theory of explanation seems to suggest that only the most reductive accounts can legitimately be termed explanatory. This is not what we find in actual scientific practice. In this paper, I attempt to reconcile these ideas. I claim that Kitcher's theory picks out ideal explanations, but that our term “explanation” is used to cover other accounts that have a certain relationship with the ideal accounts. At times, “versions” and portions of ideal explanations can also be considered explanatory.
- Unification, Reduction, and Non-Ideal Explanations
Volume 112, Issue 1 , pp 75-96
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Todd Jones (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, U.S.A.