Semantic Closure, Descriptions and Non-Triviality
- Graham Priest
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
It is known that a semantically closed theory with description may well be trivial if the principles concerning denotation and descriptions are formulated in certain ways, even if the underlying logic is paraconsistent. This paper establishes the non-triviality of a semantically closed theory with a natural, but non-extensional, description operator.
- Priest, G. (1979): Indefinite descriptions, Logique et Anal. 85(6): 5–21.
- Priest, G. (1987): In Contradiction, MartinusNijhoff, the Hague.
- Priest, G. (1997): On a Paradox of Hilbert and Bernays,J. Philos. Logic 26: 45–56.
- Priest, G. (1998): The trivial object, andthe non-triviality of a semantically closed theory with descriptions, J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 8: 171–83.
- Priest, G. (199+): Paraconsistent logic. In:D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd. edn, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, forthcoming.
- Semantic Closure, Descriptions and Non-Triviality
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Volume 28, Issue 6 , pp 549-558
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- semantic closure
- Graham Priest (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia