Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human modification of forest habitats is a major component of global environmental change. Even areas that remain predominantly forested may be changed considerably by human alteration of historical disturbance regimes. To better understand human influences on the abundance and pattern of forest habitats, we studied forest land cover change from 1936 to 1996 in a 25 000 km2 landscape in the Oregon (USA) Coast Range. We integrated historical forest survey data and maps from 1936 with satellite imagery and GIS data from 1996 to quantify changes in major forest cover types. Change in the total area of closed-canopy forests was relatively minor, decreasing from 68% of the landscape in 1936 to 65% in 1996. In contrast, large-conifer forests decreased from 42% in 1936 to 17% in 1996, whereas small-conifer forests increased from 21% of the landscape in 1936 to 39% in 1996. Linear regression models were used to predict changes in the proportion of large conifer forest as a function of socioeconomic and environmental variables at scales of subbasins (mean size = 1964 km2, n=13), watersheds (mean size = 302 km2, n=83), and subwatersheds (mean size = 18 km2, n=1325). The proportion of land in private ownership was the strongest predictor at all three spatial scales (partial R2 values 0.57–0.76). The amounts of variation explained by other independent variables were comparatively minor. Results corroborate the hypothesis that differing management regimes on private and public ownerships have led to different pathways of landscape change. Furthermore, these distinctive trajectories are consistent over a broad domain of spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addicott J.F., Aho J.M., Antolin M.F., Padilla D.K., Richardson J.S., and Soluk D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: Scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M.J. and Legendre P. 1999. An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coeffi-cients in a linear model. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 61: 271–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews H.J. and Cowlin R.W. 1940. Forest resources of the Douglas-fir region. Miscellaneous Publication No. 389, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson A.-L., Ostlund L. and Hellberg E. 2002. Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866-1999 based on interpretation of historical records. Landscape Ecology 17: 403–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black A.E., Morgan P. and Hessburg P.F. 2003. Social and biophysical correlates of change in forest landscapes of the interior Columbia Basin, USA. Ecological Applications 13: 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.B., Spies T.A., Alig R.J., Oetter D.R., Maiersperger T.K. and Fiorella M. 2002. Characterizing 23 years (1972-95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery. Ecosystems 5: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow T.R., Host G.E. and Mladenoff D.J. 1999. Ownership and ecosystem as sources of spatial heterogeneity in a forested landscape, Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecology 14: 449–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly C., Neilson R.P. and Phillips D.L. 1994. A statistical topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 140–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drapeau P., Leduc A., Giroux J.-F., Savard J.-P.L., Bergeron Y. and Vickery W.L. 2000. Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests. Ecological Monographs 70: 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J.F. and Dyrness C.T. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon andWashington. General Technical Report GTR-PNW-8, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.

  • Hall F.G., Botkin D.B., Strebel D.E., Woods K.D. and Goetz S.J. 1991. Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology 72: 628–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant-species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargis C.D., Bissonette J.A. and Turner D.L. 1999. The influence of forest fragmentation and landscape pattern on American martens. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin J.D., Anderson N.H., Cline S.P., Aumen N.G., Sedell J.R., Lienkaemper G.W., Cromack K. and Cummins K.W. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impara P.C. 1997. Spatial and temporal patterns of fire in the forests of the central Oregon Coast Range. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insightful. 2001. Splus 6 user's guide. Insightful Corporation, Seattle, Washington, USA.

  • Kennedy R.S.H. and Spies T.A. in press. Forest cover changes in the Oregon Coast Range from 1939 to 1993. Forest Ecology and Management.

  • Kline J.D., Moses A. and Alig R.J. 2001. Integrating urbanization into landscape-level ecological assessments. Ecosystems 4: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation-trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C. and Li B.L. 1996. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt revisited. Ecological Applications 6: 784–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino M.V. and Perault D.R. 2000. Assembly and disassembly of mammal communities in a fragmented temperate rain forest. Ecology 81: 1517–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly B.F. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin K.J. and McComb W.C. 2002. Small mammal habitat associations at patch and landscape scales in Oregon. Forest Science 48: 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack G.R. 1994. Plant-species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75: 1491–1502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb W.C., McGrath M.T., Spies T.A. and Vesely D. 2002. Models for mapping potential habitat at landscape scales: An example using northern spotted owls. Forest Science 48: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and McComb W.C. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Monographs 65: 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff D.J., White M.A., Pastor J. and Crow T.R. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecological Applications 3: 294–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaike T. and Kamitani T. 1999. Factors affecting changes in landscape diversity in rural areas of the Fagus crenata forest region of central Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 43: 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J., Wasserman W. and Kutner M.H. 1989. Applied linear regression models. Irwin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann J.L. and Gregory M.J. 2002. Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann J.L. and Spies T.A. 1998. Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecological Monographs 68: 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson D.H., Hagar J.C., Carey A.B., Cissel J.H. and Swanson F.J. 2001. Wildlife of westside and high montane forests. In Johnson D.H. and O'Neill T.A. (eds), Wildlife-habitat relationships in Oregon and Washington, pp. 187–212. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder J.E., Rea T.E. and Funsch D.E. 1999. Deforestation, reforestation and forest fragmentation on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina and Georgia. American Midland Naturalist 142: 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B., Voss P.R., Hagen A.E., Field D.R. and Mladenoff D.J. 2001. Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. Forest Science 47: 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff V.C., Mladenoff D.J. and Boyce M.S. 2000. Effects of interacting disturbances on landscape patterns: Budworm defoliation and salvage logging. Ecological Applications 10: 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff V.C., Mladenoff D.J., He H.S. and Boyce M.S. 1999. Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1649–1659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple W.J., Hershey K.T. and Anthony R.G. 2000. Historical forest patterns of Oregon's central Coast Range. Biological Conservation 93: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins W.G. 1997. Landscapes of promise: The Oregon story 1800-1940. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies T.A., Franklin J.F. and Thomas T.B. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69: 1689–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies T.A., Reeves G.H., Burnett K.M., McComb W.C., Johnson K.N., Grant G., Ohmann J.L., Garman S.L. and Bettinger P. 2002. Assessing the ecological consequences of forest policies in a multi-ownership province in Oregon. In J. Liu and TaylorW.W. (eds). Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management, pp. 179–207. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies T.A., Ripple W.J. and Bradshaw G.A. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications 4: 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield B.J., Bliss J.C. and Spies T.A. 2002. Land ownership and landscape structure: A spatial analysis of sixty-six Oregon (USA) Coast Range watersheds. Landscape Ecology 17: 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L. and Nowak M.A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. and Ruscher C.L. 1988. Changes in landscape patterns in Georgia, USA. Landscape Ecology 1: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Wear D.N. and Flamm R.O. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic peninsula. Ecological Applications 6: 1150–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H. and Chen Y.Q. 2000. Multiscale characterization of land-use patterns in China. Ecosystems 3: 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M. 1994. Beyond global warming-ecology and global change. Ecology 75: 1861–1876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann J.E. 1995. Assessment of forest fragmentation in southern New England using remote-sensing and geographic information-systems technology. Conservation Biology 9: 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear D.N. and Bolstad P. 1998. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1: 575–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear D.N., Liu R., Foreman J.M. and Sheffield R.M. 1999. The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management 118: 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear D.N., TurnerM.G. and Flamm R.O. 1996. Ecosystem management with multiple owners: Landscape dynamics in a southern Appalachian watershed. Ecological Applications 6: 1173–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • White M.A. and Mladenoff D.J. 1994. Old-growth forest landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landscape Ecology 9: 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly M.C. 2002. Spatial simulation of historical landscape patterns in coastal forests of the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 1316–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly M.C. and Spies T.A. 2001. Influences of environment and disturbance on forest patterns in coastal Oregon watersheds. Ecology 82: 1443–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly M.C., Spies T.A., Long C.J. and Whitlock C. 2000. Simulating historical variability in the amount of old forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Conservation Biology 14: 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • With K.A. and Crist T.O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76: 2446–2459.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimberly, M.C., Ohmann, J.L. A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range. Landscape Ecology 19, 631–646 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000042904.42355.f3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000042904.42355.f3

Navigation