Skip to main content
Log in

National sovereignty & transboundary protected areas in Southern Africa

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion that Transboundary Protected Areas (TBPAs) will act as `Peace Parks' has become an important argument in their promotion in post-Apartheid Southern Africa. This `Peace Parks Concept' is implicitly based upon the assumption that national sovereignty will not become a constraining factor in the creation and management of TBPAs. However, this assumption is problematic. TBPAs introduce various changes in the landscape with consequences for the ways in which a state can exercise its sovereignty over its borderland and citizens. This situation might evoke state action that could endanger the various environmental, socio-economic and political objectives of TBPAs. A state's behaviour with regard to TBPAs is not just informed by its interests in TBPAs, but also by its strategic and other interests in the wider borderland area. These are not necessarily compatible with the environmental and economic objectives of TBPAs. The ways in which these interests are mediated are highly complex and non-linear. Because of the inter-dependency that TBPAs create, the extent to which a state can pursue certain interests by means of TBPAs will be (partially) constrained by the wishes of the other states involved. In addition, power has to be shared with a wide range of non-state actors. The operation of sovereignty in TBPAs is therefore highly unpredictable and cannot be captured in static zero-sum terms. Actor Network Theory is identified as a possible starting-point to unravel and evaluate these complex political processes in TBPAs and their subsequent outcomes for state sovereignty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A. and Gibson C.C., 1999: Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4): 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D. and Grove R. (eds), 1987: Conservation in Africa, people, policies and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin J.S., 1998: The evolution of the constitution of the constitution of sovereignty and the emergence of human rights norms. Journal of International Studies 27(2): 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayart J., Ellis S. and Hibou B., 1999: The criminalization of the state in Africa, James Currey, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree N., 2002: False antithesis? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode 34(1): 111–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A.R., 2002: Power, politics and networks: shaping partnerships for sustainable communities. Area 34(2): 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism (DEAT), 2003: http://www.environment.gov.za.

  • De Villiers B., 1999: Peace Parks, the way ahead. HSRC Publishers, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, 2001: A bioregional approach to South Africa's protected areas. DEAT, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J., 1997: The Politics of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy R., 2002: Peace Parks: The paradox of Globalisation. Geopolitics 6(2): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy R., 1997: The environmental challenge to the nation-state: superparks and national parks policy in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies 23(3): 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis S., 1994: Of elephants and men. Politics and nature conservation in South Africa, Journal of Southern African Studies 20(1): 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fall J.J., 2003, Planning protected areas across boundaries: New paradigms and old ghosts. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17(1/2): 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakir S., 2000: Transfrontier conservation areas: a new dawn for ecotourism, or a new form of conservation expansionism? Policy Thinktank Series 3, June, IUCN, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Few R., 2001: Containment and counter-containment: planner/community relations in conservation planning. Geographical Journal 167(2): 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire K. and Pimbert M.P. (eds), 1997: Social Change and conservation. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J., Communing D., Metcalfe S., t'Sas-Rolfes M., Singh J., Chonguiça E., Rowen M. and Oglethorpe J., 1999: Study on the Development of Transboundary Natural Resource Management Areas in Southern Africa, Main report. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths I.L., 1995: African boundaries and national parks. In: Blake G. et al. (eds), The peaceful management of transboundary resources, pp. 357–370, IBRU, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs R.A., 2000: Designing boundaries for a continent: the geopolitics of an African Renaissance. In: Pratt M.A. and Brown J.A. (eds), Borderlands under stress, IBRU, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M.A., 1995: The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennop E., Jefferson C. and McLean A., 2001: The Challenge to control South Africa's borders and borderline. Monograph No 57, Institute of International Security Studies, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton L.S., Mackay J.C., Worboys G.L., Jones R.A. and Manson GB, 1996: Transborder Protected Areas Cooperation. Australian Alps Liaison Committee & IUCN, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks J., 2001: Transfrontier-Conservation Areas (TFCAs) in Southern Africa: their role in conserving biodiversity, socioeconomic development and promoting a culture of peace. In: International Society of Tropical Foresters (ISTF). Transboundary Protected Areas: The Viability of Regional Conservation Strategies. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

  • De Alcántara H., 1999: Uses and abuses of the concept of governance in the international development community. In: Nas P.J.M. and Silva P. (eds), Modernization, leadership and participation, theoretical issues in development Sociology, Leiden University Press, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill K.A., 1996: Zimbabwe's wildlife utilization programs: grassroots democracy or an extension of state power? African Studies Review 39(1): 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme D. and Murphree M. (eds.), 2001: African wildlife and livelihoods, the promise and performance of community conservation. James Currey, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R., 1990: Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley J. and Scoones I., 2000: Knowledge, power and politics: the environmental policy-making process in Ethiopia. Journal of Modern African Studies 38(1): 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinton W.A., 2000: Nato's intervention in Kosovo: the legal case for violating Yugoslavia's national sovereignty in the absence of Security Council approval. Houston Journal of International Law 22(3): 403–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch E., 1998: Nature has the power to heal old wounds: war, peace and changing patterns of conservation in Southern Africa. In: Simon D., Cooper D. and Cootzee H. (eds), South Africa in southern Africa, reconfiguring the region. James Currey, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J., 1992: Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems practice 5(4): 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin K.T. (ed.), 1998: The greening of sovereignty in world politics. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil R.J., 1990: International Parks for Peace. In: Thorsell, J. (ed) Parks on the borderline: experience in transfrontier conservation. IUCN Protected Areas Programme Series no. 1: 25–38, IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mctcalfe S.C., 1999: Study on the development of Transboundary Natural Resource Management Areas in Southern Africa — Community Perspectives. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minaar A., 2001: Border control and regionalism, the case of South Africa. African Security Review 10(2).

  • Mohan G. and Stokke K., 2000: Participatory development and empowerment: The dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly 21(2): 247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann R.P., 1997: Primitive ideas: protected area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Development and Change 28: 559–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen S. and Chikoko H., 2002: The Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park, how great is the idea? Newsletter of the Southern Africa TBNRM network 1(1): 6–7, 11, Modern Press, Harare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odén B., 1998: Regionalisation in Southern Africa, the role of the dominant. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnock D., 1996: ‘Superparks: a dream impossible?’ Getaway Magazine 8(8): 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwith T., Shine C., Hamilton L. and Sheppard D., 2001: Transboundary Protected Areas for Peace and Co-operation. IUCN, Gland/Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine C., 1998: Legal mechanisms to strengthen and safeguard transboundary protected areas. In: The Peace Parks Foundation, Parks for Peace conference, 37–47, 16–18 September 1997, the Peace Parks Foundation, Somerset.

  • Singh J., 1999: Study on the Development and Management of Transboundary Conservation Areas in Southern Africa: Global Review. USAID/BSP, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J., 2000: Transboundary conservation in the African context: a threat to sovereignty? In: Border regions in transition-IV: rethinking boundaries. Geopolitics, identities and sustainability 20–24 February, Chandigarh.

  • Steenkamp C. and Grossman D., 2001: People and Parks: Cracks in the Paradigm. Policy Think Tank series 10. IUCN, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steins N.A., 2001: New directions in natural resource management. The offer of Actor-Network Theory. IDS Bulletin 32(4): 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsell J. (ed.), 1990: Parks on the borderline: Experience in transfrontier conservation. IUCN, Gland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linde H., Oglethorpe J., Sandwith T., Snelson D. and Tessema Y. (with contributions from Tiéga A. and Price T.), 2001: Beyond Boundaries: Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton-Lee J., 1999: Breaking down the barricades. Geographical: the Royal Geographical Society Magazine 65: 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, 1996: Mozambique: Transfrontier conservation areas pilot and institutional strengthening project. Report no. 15534-MOZ. Agriculture and environment division, Southern Africa department, the World Bank.

  • Zbicz D. and Green M., 1997: Status of the world's protected areas. Parks 7(3): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Amerom, M. National sovereignty & transboundary protected areas in Southern Africa. GeoJournal 58, 265–273 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000017957.42266.d5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000017957.42266.d5

Navigation