Abstract
Universities can and have existed without academic freedom and academic tenure. But academic freedom is necessary for a university dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge in a democratic society. Both academic freedom and academic tenure are not only rights but also carry with them moral obligations. Furthermore academic tenure is the best defense of academic freedom that American universities have found. Academic tenure can be successfully defended from the many contemporary attacks to which it is being subjected only insofar as it is necessary to defend academic freedom, and only if all involved in the system of tenure observe the ethical requirements that the system demands.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
AAUP (1995). AAUP Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
De George, R.T. (1985). The Nature and Limits of Authority. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
De George, R.T. (1997). Academic Freedom and Tenure: Ethical Issues. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Dworkin, R. (1996). Objectivity and truth: You'd better believe it, Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2) 87–139.
Kerr, C. (1963). The Uses of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rashdall, H. (1987). Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. F.M. Powicke (Ed.) and A.B. Emden (new Ed.), 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rorty, R. (1994). Does academic freedom have philosophical presuppositions?, Academe (November–December), 52–63.
Searle, J.R. (1992). Rationality and realism, what is at stake?, Daedalus 122 (4) 55–84.
Wilson, R. and Walsh, S. (2003). Tears in the fabric of tenure, The Chronicle of Higher Education 10, A8–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De George, R.T. Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 11–25 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025421706331
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025421706331