Skip to main content
Log in

Facilitation in multiple life-history stages: evidence for nucleated succession in coastal dunes

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding plant interactions during succession is a central goal of plant ecology. The nucleation model of succession proposes that facilitative interactions lead to outward radiations of colonization from established plants. I tested the nucleation hypothesis for early successional plants on the primary dunes of barrier islands in the southeastern United States. On the coast of Florida and Georgia, I sampled the above-ground vegetation and the seed bank, and conducted a seedling emergence experiment in the field. Vegetation sampling at both field sites showed more positive correlations in percent cover of adult species than expected by chance. At both sites, there were significantly more seeds under plants than in open microsites. Seeds of the same species as the adult plants in the vegetated microsites were removed from the analysis, so the accumulation of seeds under adults is not due simply to a seed shadow effect. Seeds of six species were added to plots under plants and in open microsites, and seedling emergence was significantly higher under plants than in the open. The findings support the predictions of the nucleation hypothesis for the early life-history stages of seed dispersal and germination, and help to explain the clumped distribution of dune plants seen in the field. The results add further support for the contention that facilitation is an important mode of plant interaction in stressful and disturbed habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer S. 1995. Tree-grass dynamics in a prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland-reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2: 83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach C.E. 1994. Effects of a specialist herbivore (Altica subplicata) on Salix cordata and sand dune succession. Ecological Monographs 64: 423–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold R.A. 1954. The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. Methuen and Company, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista T.L. and Shumway S.W. 1998. A comparison of the seed banks of sand dunes with different disturbance histories on Cape Cod National Seashore. Rhodora 100: 298–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour M.G., de Jong T.D. and Pavlik B.M. 1985. Marine beach and dune plant communities. In: Chabot B.F. and Mooney H.A. (eds), Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 296–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L. 2000. Predicting direct and indirect interactions during succession in a mid-littoral rocky shore assemblage. Ecological Monographs 70: 45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M.D. and Callaway R.M. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M.D. and Hacker S.D. 1994. Physical stress and positive associations among marsh plants. American Naturalist 144: 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M.D. and Shumway S.W. 1993. Competition and facilitation in marsh plants. American Naturalist 142: 718–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressolier C. and Thomas Y.F. 1977. Studies on wind and plant interactions on French Atlantic coastal dunes. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 47: 331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch J.N. 1998. Vascular Plants of Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Friends of Rookery Bay, Naples, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway R.M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Review 61: 306–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos E.M., Figueroa M.E. and Davy A.J. 1994. Nucleation and facilitation in salt-marsh succession-interactions between Spartina maritima and Arthrocnemum perenne. Journal of Ecology 82: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen E. and Gerber J.F. 1990. Climate. In: Meyers R.L. and Ewel J.J. (eds), Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements F.E. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24: 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J.H. and Slatyer R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111: 1119–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan W.H. 1982. Vegetation of Sapelo Island. The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan W.H. and Duncan M.B. 1987. Seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic coasts. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld J.G. 1990. Dynamics and processes of barrier-island vegetation.Reviews in Aquatic Sciences 2: 437–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle G. 1997. No evidence for interspecific interactions between plants in the first stage of succession on coastal dunes in subarctic Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 902–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H.S. 1976. Succession. In: May R.M. (ed.), Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter A.F. and Aarssen L.W. 1988. Plants helping plants. Bioscience 38: 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa S.I., Furukawa A. and Oikawa T. 1995. Zonal plant-distribution and edaphic and micrometeorological conditions on a coastal sand dune. Ecological Research 10: 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A.F. and Barbour M.G. 1990. Dunes and maritime forests. In: Meyers R.L. and Ewel J.J. (eds), Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 429–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P.M. and Bertness M.D. 1997. Re-examining the role of positive interactions in communities. Ecology 78: 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X.D. and Wilson S.D. 1998. Facilitation among woody plants establishing in an old field. Ecology 79: 2694–2705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter J. 2000. Colonization constraints during primary succession on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes. Journal of Ecology 88: 825–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looney P.B. and Gibson D.J. 1995. The relationship between the soil seed bank and above-ground vegetation of a coastal barrier island. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 825–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews T.D., Stapor F.W. Jr and Richter C.R. 1980. Ecological characterization of the sea island coastal region of South Carolina and Georgia. Physical features of the characterization area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun M.A. 1998. Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 713–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiners S.J. and Gorchov D.L. 1998. Effects of distance to Juniperus virginiana on the establishment of Fraxinus and Acer seedlings in old fields. American Midland Naturalist 139: 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niering W.A., Whittaker R.H. and Lowe C.H. 1963. The saguaro – a population in relation to environment. Science 142: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A., Collins S.L. and Armesto J.J. 1987. Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession. Botanical Review 53: 335–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planisek S.L. and Pippen R.W. 1984. Do sand dunes have seed banks? Michigan Botanist 23: 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset O. and Lepart J. 2000. Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis). Journal of Ecology 88: 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 2000. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway S.W. 2000. Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia 124: 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum M.G. and Horvitz C.C. 2000. Seed arrival under different genera of trees in a neotropical pasture. Plant Ecology 149: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rolf F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practices of statistics in biological reseach. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS 1997. Sigma Stat statistical software. Version 2.03. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1985. The resource ratio hypothesis of succession. American Naturalist 125: 827–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1988. Dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton Universtiy Press, Princeton, New Jersy, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twilley R.R. 1982. Litter dynamics and organic carbon exchange in black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) basin forests in a southwest Florida estuary. Doctrol, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban D.L. and Shugart H.H. 1992. Individual-based models of forest succession. In: Glenn-Lewin D.C., Peet R.K. and Veblen T.T. (eds), Plant succession: theory and prediction. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 249–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • VerdÚ M. and García-Fayos P. 1996. Nucleation processes in a Mediterranean bird-dispersed plant. Functional Ecology 10: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlin R.P. 1982. Guide to the vascular plants of central Florida. University Presses of Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarranton G.A. and Morrison's R.G. 1974. Spatial dynamics of a primary succession – nucleation. Journal of Ecology 62: 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Franks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, S.J. Facilitation in multiple life-history stages: evidence for nucleated succession in coastal dunes. Plant Ecology 168, 1–11 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426608966

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426608966

Navigation