Skip to main content
Log in

The cultural model of “the good farmer” and the environmental question in Finland

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Farmers' relationship with nature isdetermined by the significance of agriculturefor human beings. When agriculture is definedas human activity that uses renewable naturalresources and aims to produce usable food andfiber products, agriculture is explicitlydefined as production. Farmers' relationshipwith nature is based on the principle ofproduction. This article discusses thecontradiction between the peasant values ofprotection of nature that many farmers inFinland still have and the environmental harmtheir production-oriented farming style causes.When farmers interpret their farming practicesas harmonious co-operation with nature, it isdifficult for them to see the polluting effectsof their work. Paul B. Thompson's suggestionthat three religious–philosophical doctrines(hard work, the doctrine of grace, and the mythof garden) have made it easy for farmers toadopt productionist farming strategy is used asa framework to interpret farmers' narrativesconcerning their relationship with nature. Theresearch is qualitative and biographical. Thedata include life stories and biographicaltexts farmers wrote for a competition in1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allardt, E. (1987). Sosiologia I. Juva, Finland: WSOY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almås, R., K. H. Karlsen, and I. Thorland (1995). Fra pliktsamfunn til munlighetstorg. Tre genegasjoner skriver sin Ungdom. [From the society of duty to the market place of opportunity. Three generations write about their youth.] Report No. 5/1995. Trondheim: Senter for Bygdeforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, R. (1983). “Western attitudes and environmental ethics.” In R. Elliot and A. Gare (eds.), Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings (pp. 201–230). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive Biography. Qualitative Research Methods 7. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, I. and E. Phillips (1997). “Sustainability and the restructuring of tradition: A comparative analysis of three rural localities.” In G. Lawrence, K. Lyons, and S. Momtaz (eds.), Social Change in Rural Australia (pp. 276–289). Central Queensland University: University Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, H. (1994). In the Shadow of the Tree. Kinship. Property and Inheritance among Farm Families. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, V. (1998). Taloppoikainen etiikka ja kulutuksen henki: kotitalousneuvonnasta kuluttajapolitiikkaan 1900-luvun Suomessa. [Peasant ethic and the spirit of consumption. From household advising to consumer policy in 20th century Finland.] Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmila, M. (2000). Social Bonds in Rural Life. Regulating the Dangerous. Research report 113. Stakes. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health in Finland.

  • Hietaniemi, T. (1991). “Protestanttinen ja katolinen etiikka, kapitalismin henki ja muoto.” [Protestant and catholic ethic, the spirit and the form of capitalism.] Sosiologia 28(3): 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, P. (1995a). Tuotannon muutokset ja ympäristöpolitiikka. [Changes in production and the environmental policy.] Turku: Turun Yliopiston Julkaisuja, Sarja C 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, P. (1995b). “The development of agricultural pollution control in Finland.” Sociologia Ruralis 35(2): 206–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, Steinar (1996). InterViews. An Introduction to a Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Turner (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphors. Chicago / London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, I., P. Ruuskanen, and H. Susiluoma (1996). Risupartoja vai markkinamiehia? Tapaustutkimus Etelä-Pohjanmaan luomutuottajista. [Hippies or yuppies? A case study of organic farmers in southern Ostrobothnia.] Kokkola: Jyväskylän Yliopisto. Chydenius-Instituutin Tutkimuksia 5/1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing. Context and Narrative. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1993). Lovemaps. Clinical Concepts of Sexual/Erotic Health and Pathology, Paraphilia, and Gender Transposition in Childhood, Adolescence, and Maturity. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. I. and G. K. Leigh (1995). “Families and Sexuality.” In D. Day, K. R. Gilbert, B. H. Settles, and W. R. Burr (eds.), Research and Theory in Family Science (pp. 187–192). Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. A. and C. Sachs (2000). “Standpoint Epistemology and the Uses of Self-Reflection in Feminist Ethnography: Lessons for Rural Sociology.” Rural Sociology 64(2): 194–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (1979). Green and Pleasant Land? Social Change in Rural England. London: Hutchinson of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, M. (1994). Rantojensuojeluohjelma. Kilpailevia tulkintoja ja vertautumatonta rationaalisuutta. [Protection of shorelines. Competing interpretations and non-comparable rationalities.] Jyväskylän Yliopiston Sosiologian Laitoksen Julkaisuja 59.

  • Passmore, J. (1980). Man's responsibility for nature. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, M. (1992). Talolliset ja torpparit. Vuosisadan vaihteen maatalouskysymys Suomessa. [Landowners and crofters. Agricultural question in Finland at the turn of the century.] Historiallisia tutkimuksia. [Studies in History] 164. Vammala, Finland: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, G., M. M. Bell, S. Jarnagin, and D. Bauer (2000). “Coming back across the fence: Masculinity and the transition to sustainable agriculture.” Rural Sociology 65(2): 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, J. P. (1983). On Way of Life Typologies. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Social Policy. Reprint Series B No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. (1992). Prairie Patrimony. Family, Farming and Community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalen, M. (1987). “Life-course patterns and peasant culture in France: A critical assessment.” Journal of Family History 12(1-3): 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalen, M. (1983). Love and Power in the Peasant Family. Rural France in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvasti, T. (2001). Talonpojan elämä. Tutkimus elämäntapaa jäsentävistä kulttuurisista malleista. [Peasant life. A study of the cultural models organizing the way of life.] Helsinki: SKS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W. and J. H. Gagnon (1984). “Sexual scripts.” Social Science and Modern Society 22(1): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1995). The Spirit of the Soil. Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen, L. E. (1994). “Reflections on the biographical method.” In M. van der Burgh and M. Endeveld (eds.), Women on Family Farms. Gender Research, EC Policies and New Perspectives (pp. 139–146). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Circle for Rural European Studies / Dutch Network on Farm and Rural Women's Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilkko, A. (1994). “Homespun life: Metaphors on the course of life in women's autobiographies.” Cultural Studies 8(2): 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, N. and R. Munton (1992). Conceptualizing agricultureenvironment relations. combining political economy and socio-cultural approaches to pesticide pollution.” Sociologia Ruralis 32(1): 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1970). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. Jr. (1967). “The Historical Roots of our Environmental Crisis.” Science 155: 1203–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylöstalo, P. and V. Notkola (1994). “Maatalousyrittäjien työn arvostus ja työtyytyväisyys.” [Farmers' contentment and appreciation of their work.] In P. Susitaival (eds.), Työterveys ja maatalous Suomessa 1992. Tutkimus maatalousyrittäjien työterveyshuollosta, terveydentilasta ja työssä viihtymisestä. [Farming and occupational health in Finland in 1992.] Helsinki: Kelan tutkimus-ja kehitysyksikkö.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiina Silvasti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silvasti, T. The cultural model of “the good farmer” and the environmental question in Finland. Agriculture and Human Values 20, 143–150 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024021811419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024021811419

Navigation