Skip to main content
Log in

Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study

  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the significant role attributed to community organizations by many social capital scholars, it is appropriate to investigate the dynamics of that process. In particular, Woolcock and Narayan (World Bank Res. Obs. 15(2): 225–249, 2000) have suggested that bridging and bonding are two different types of connections, whereby bridging is associated with loose ties across communities and bonding is associated with strong ties within a limited group. This qualitative study explores the loose and strong ties of 39 participants connected through community organizations in rural and urban New South Wales. The results suggest that loose and strong ties are not synonymous with bridging and bonding. In general loose and strong ties differ in degree rather than in kind and people prefer to bridge through their strong ties. The interesting exceptions were ties to professionals, which were highly trusted but defined as loose ties. It is suggested that a model for a high social capital society might be a chain of well-bonded groups each with strong links to some other groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Blomkvist, H. (2001). Traditional communities, caste, and democracy: The Indian mystery. In: Dekker, P., and Uslaner, E. (eds.), Social Capital and Politics in Everyday Life, Routledge, London, pp. 73-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Adm. Sci. Q. 42: 339-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1998). The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10(1): 5-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 95-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1961). Democracy in America (originally published 1835), Schoken, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1986). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91: 481-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P., Bellamy, J., and Black, A. (1999). Building social trust through education. In: Winter, I. (ed.), Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia,Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, pp. 225-249.

  • Leonard, R. (1997). Theorising the relationship between agency and communion. Theory Psychol. 7(6): 823-835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. Am. Behav. Sci. 40(5): 575-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyx, J., and Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 36(1): 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24: 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1996). A community of freedoms. Aust. Q. 68(1): 31-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, A. (2000). Social Capital and Popular Mobilization: Studying Environmental Protests in an Indian State. Unpublished manuscript, Uppsala University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J. (2000). A Resource Model of Social Capital: Networks, Recruitment and Political Participa-tion in Sweden. Paper presented to workshop on voluntary associations, social capital and interest mediation, European Consortium for Political Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, April.

  • Uslaner, E. M. (1997). Faith, Hope and Charity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland–College Park.

  • White, J., Reedy, E., and Leonard, R. (2001). Addressing Women's Fear of Crime in Public Housing Estates: The Case of Toongabbie. Report (unpublished) to the NSW Council of Social Services.

  • Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Res. Obs. 15(2): 225-249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leonard, R., Onyx, J. Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 14, 189–203 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023900111271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023900111271

Navigation