Abstract
This article suggests a theory of ballot position effect based on the amount of information present in the electorate while accounting for several alternative hypotheses. The more information that voters have, all other factors held constant, the less a role ballot position will play. Additionally, the role of electoral institutions in mitigating or magnifying the effect is considered. The theories are tested with precinct-level data from city council elections held in Peoria, Illinois, from 1983 through 1999. Position effect is found to account for a bonus of 0.7% to 5.2% of the precinct-level vote share per position on the ballot. The level of aggregate information and the institutional setting explain a significant share of ballot position effect, even while examined in the presence of alternative explanations such as incumbency, endorsement, campaign expenditure, gender, and race.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bain, H. M., and Hecock, D. S. (1957). Ballot Position and Voter's Choice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Bakker, Eric, and Lijphart, Arend (1980). A crucial test of alphabetic voting: the elections at the University of Leiden, 1973–1978. British Journal of Political Science 10: 521–525.
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd (1998). Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Happ, Trudi (1992). Ballot propositions and information costs: direct democracy and the fatigued voter. Western Political Quarterly 45: 559–568.
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Snipp, J. (1993). Local sources on information and voter choice in state elections. American Politics Quarterly 21: 473–489.
Brischetto, Robert, and Engstrom, Richard (1997). Cumulative voting and Latino representation: exit surveys in fifteen Texas communities. Social Science Quarterly 78: 973–92.
Byrne, Gary C., and Pueschel, J. Kristian (1974). But who should I vote for for county coroner? The Journal of Politics 36: 778–84.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Cole, Richard, and Taebel, Delbert (1992). Cumulative voting in local elections: lessons from the Alamagordo experience. Social Science Quarterly. 73: 194–201.
Cole, Richard, Taebel, Delbert, and Engstrom, Richard (1990). Cumulative voting in a municipal election: a note on voter reactions and electoral consequences. Western Political Quarterly 43: 191–199.
Conover, Pamela, and Feldman, Stanley (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: campaigns, cues and inferences processes. American Journal of Political Science 33: 912–939.
Cronbach, Lee J. (1950). Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement 10: 3–31.
Darcy, Robert (1998). Position effects in multimember districts: the New Hampshire House of Representatives, 1972–1994. Polity 30: 691–703.
Darcy, Robert, and McAllister, Ian (1990). Ballot position effects. Electoral Studies 9: 5–17.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Fiorina, Morris (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Guinier, Lani (1994). The Tyranny of the Majority. New York: The Free Press.
Illinois State Board of Elections (2002a). Illinois Campaign Disclosure Act (available on-line at http://www.elections.state.il.us/CDS/pages/DiscAct.htm).
Illinois State Board of Elections (2002b). Illinois State Board of Elections Homepage(http://www.elections.state.il.us).
Kelley, Jonathan, and McAllister, Ian (1984). Ballot paper cues and the vote in Australia and Britain: alphabetic voting, sex, and title. Public Opinion Quarterly 48: 452– 466.
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York, A. A. Knopf.
Key, V. O. with Cummings, Milton C. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6: 107–118.
Krosnick, Jon (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213–236.
Lijphart, Arend, and Pintor, Rafael Lopez (1988). Alphabetic bias in partisan elections: patterns of voting for the Spanish senate, 1982 and 1986. Electoral Studies 7: 225–231.
Lupia, Arthur (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review 88: 63–76.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott, Monika L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science 41: 270–283.
McDermott, Monika L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51: 895–918.
McDermott, Monika L. (1999). Shortcut voting: candidate characteristics and voter inference. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 291–330.
Mueller, John (1969). Voting on the propositions: ballot patterns and historical trends in California. American Political Science Review 63: 1197–1212.
Mueller, John (1970). Choosing among 133 candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 395–402.
Nichols, Stephen M. (1997). Ballot position revisited: a multivariate assessment of ballot position and candidate success in low-salience elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Tucson, Arizona.
Nichols, Stephen, and Strizek, Gregory (1995). Electronic voting machines and ballot roll-off. American Politics Quarterly 23: 300–318.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. (1991). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robson, C., and Walsh, B. (1974). The importance of positional voting bias in the Irish general election of 1973. Political Studies 22: 191–203
Simon, Herbert A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Simon, Herbert A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology New York: Cambridge University Press.
Still, Edward (1984). Alternatives to single-member districts. In C. Davidson (ed.), Minority Vote Dilution, pp. 249–267. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
Taebel, Delbert A. (1975). The effects of ballot position on electoral success. American Journal of Political Science 19: 519–26.
Thomas, Norman (1968). Voting machines and voter participation in four Michigan constitutional revision referenda. Western Political Quarterly21: 409–419.
Upton, G. J. G., and Brook, D. (1974). The importance of positional voting bias in British elections. Political Studies 22: 178–190.
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Walker, J. (1966). Ballot forms and voter fatigue: an analysis of the office block and party column ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science 10: 448–63.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980). Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brockington, D. A Low Information Theory of Ballot Position Effect. Political Behavior 25, 1–27 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022946710610
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022946710610