Skip to main content
Log in

Growth rate, root development and nutrient uptake of 55 plant species from the Great Plains Grasslands, USA

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical and theoretical studies have highlighted that plantcompetition and species diversity are substantially affected by interactionsamong plant growth and nutrient uptake rates, root lateral spread, rootplasticity, and small scale soil nutrient heterogeneity. This study wasdesignedto (a) experimentally estimate parameters regarding rootscaling patterns, root biomass allocation, growth rates, nutrient productivity,and root nutrient influx rates of 55 plant species common to Great Plainsgrasslands; and (b) determine if grasses and forbs can beclassified into statistically distinct groups based on these characteristics.Wefound that: (1) In all species root lateral spread, rootlength, and root surface area had significant allometric scaling relationshipswith root biomass, but that the relationships were unaffected by Navailability.(2) Reductions in the supply of N increased the root:shootratio in 62% of the species. (3) The frequency distributionandmean values of maximum relative growth rates were very similar for grasses andforbs/shrubs, but mid successional grasses had a higher relative growth ratethan late successional ones. (4) In 78% of the species tested,N productivity was increased by reductions in the N supply.(5)When subjected to a high N supply, the N and P productivity of grasses was, onaverage, higher than that of forbs/shrubs, and the N and P productivity ofC4 grasses was, on average, higher than that of C3grasses. No differences were found under a low N supply. (6)Nodifferences on the average maximum N and P influx rates per unit of rootsurfacearea were found between grasses and forbs or between C3 andC4 grasses, but both were correlated with maximum relative growthrate. (7) The set of parameters we measured were able toseparate grasses and forbs/shrubs into statistically distinct groups that tendto follow in broad terms the “coarse” vs. “fine” scaleforaging strategies hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R., Boot R.G.A. and van der Aart P.J.M. 1991. The relation between above-and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87: 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber S.A. 1984. Soil Nutrient Bioavailabilty: A Mechanistic Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassirirad H., Caldwell M.M. and Bilbrough C. 1993. Effects of soil temperature and nitrogen status on kinetics of 15NO3-uptake by roots of field-grown Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schult. New Phytologist 123: 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz F.A. and Sultan S.E. 1987. Ecological variation and the maintenance of plant diversity. In: Urbanska K.M. (ed.), Differentiation in Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, pp. 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrough C.J. and Caldwell M.M. 1995. The effects of shading and N status on root proliferation in nutrient patches by the perennial grass Agropyron desertorum in the field. Oecologia 103: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham I.J. and Stevenson E.A. 1993. Control of root growth: effects of carbohydrates on the extension, branching and rate of respiration of different fractions of wheat roots. Physiologia Plantarum 88: 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini M.E. and Grygiel C.E. 1994. Landscape distribution of organisms and the scaling of soil resources. The American Naturalist 143: 1026–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini M.E., Mielke P.W. and Redente E.F. 1991. Permutation techniques based on Euclidian analysis spaces: a new and powerful statistical method for ecological research. In: Feoli E. and Orloci L. (eds), Computer Assisted Vegetation Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot R.G.A. and Mensink M. 1990. Size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses form contrasting habitats as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant and Soil 129: 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R.H. 1978. A difference in N use efficiency in C3 and C4 plants and its implications in adaptation and evolution. Crop Science 18: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysee J., Smolders E. and Merchx R. 1996. Modelling the uptake of nitrate by a growing plant with an adjustable root nitrate capacity. Plant and Soil 181: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M.M., Manwaring J.H. and Durham S.L. 1996. Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant size. Oecologia 106: 440–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B.D., Grime J.P. and Mackey J.M.L. 1991. A trade-off between scale and precison in resource foraging. Oecologia 87: 532–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell J., Jackson R.B., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E. and Schulze E.D. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108: 583–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper B.B. and Jackson R.B. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 28: 545–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew M.C. and Saker L.R. 1975. Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley. II. Localized, compensatory increases in lateral root growth and rates of nitrate uptake when nitrate supply is restricted to only a part of the root system. Journal of Experimental Botany 26: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einsmann J.C., Jones R.H., Pu M. and Mitchell R.J. 1999. Nutrient foraging traits of 10 co-occuring plant species of contrasting life forms. Journal of Ecology 87: 609–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen B., de Kroon H. and Berendse F. 1998. Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition of perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient availability. Oecologia 115: 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson S.K. and Fry J.E. 1997. Root proliferation and marginal patch value. Oikos 79: 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R.F. 1998. Simulation in ecosys of root growth responses to contrasting soil water and nitrogen. Ecological Modelling 107: 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Plains Flora Association 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. and Hunt R. 1975. Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 63: 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A.J., Stewart J., Robinson D., Griffiths B.S. and Fitter A.H. 2000. Spatial and physical heterogeneity of N supply from soil does not influence N capture by two grass species. Functional Ecology 14: 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D.U. 1998. The role of complementary and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 2: 704–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R. and Cornelissen J.H.C. 1997. Component of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species. New Phytologyst 135: 395–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.B., Canadell J., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E. and Schulze E.D. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108: 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.B. and Caldwell M.M. 1996. Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: modeling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environment. Journal of Ecology 84: 891–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.B. and Caldwell M.M. 1993. The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74: 612–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler A.W. 1964. Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States. American Geographical Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadley P.W., Reynolds J.F. and Chapin F.S. III 1997. A model of nitrogen uptake by Eriophorum vaginatum roots in the field: ecological implications. Ecological Monographs67: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J.A. and Reynolds J.F. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudjafari M., Kluitenberg G.J., Havlin J.L., Sisson J.B. and Schwab A.P. 1997. Spatial variability of nitrogen mineralization at the field scale. Soil Science Society of American Journal 61: 1214–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay K.D.M. and Coleman J.S. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? a test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80: 2581–2593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordelet P., Barot S. and Abbadie L. 1996. Root foraging strategies and soil patchiness in a humid savanna. Plant and Soil 182: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D.W. and Sommers L.E. 1980. Total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant tissues. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 63: 770–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M.W. and Dixon P.M. 1990. Small-scale environmental heterogeneity and the analysis of species distributions along gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H. and Remkes C. 1990. Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83: 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H., Remkes C. and Lambers H. 1990. Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiology 94: 621–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z. 1993. Mechanistic simulation models of nutrient uptake: a review. Plant and Soil 152: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds H.L. and D'Antonio C. 1996. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: Opinion. Plant and Soils 185: 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson G.P., Klingensmith K.M., Klug M.J., Paul E.A., Crum J.R. and Ellis B.G. 1997. Soil resources, microbial activity, and primary production across and agricultural ecosystem. Ecological Applications 7: 158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. 1994. Tansley Review No. 73. The response of plants to non uniform supply of nutrients. New Phytologist 127: 635–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryser P. and Lambers H. 1995. Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast-and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant and Soil 170: 251–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E.D., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., Jobbagy E., Buchmann N., Bauer G. et al. 1996. Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia 108: 503–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B. and Peters R.H. 1990. A test of Tilman model of plant strategies: relative growth rate and biomass partition. The American Naturalist 136: 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smethurst P.J. and Comeford N.B. 1993. Simulating nutrient uptake by single or competing and contrasting root systems. Soil Society of America Journal 57: 1361–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somma F., Hopmans J.W. and Clausnitzer V. 1998. Transient threedimensional modeling of soil water and solute transport with simultaneous root growth, root water and nutrient uptake. Plant and Soil 202: 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun G., Coffin D.P. and Lauenroth W.K. 1997. Comparison of root distributions of species in North American grasslands using GIS. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1991. The schism between theory and ardent empiricism: a reply to Shipley and Peters. The American Naturalist 138: 1283–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner C.L. and Knapp A.K. 1996. Responses of a C4 grass and three C3 forbs to variation in nitrogen and light in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 77: 1738–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren M.M.I., Robinson D. and Griffiths D. 1996. Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil. Plant and Soil 178: 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez de Aldana B.R. and Berendse F. 1997. Nitrogen-use efficiency in six perennial grasses from contrasting habitats. Functional Ecology 11: 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver J.E. 1968. Prairie Plants and Their Environment. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windham W.R. 1997. Phosphorus in animal feed and pet food. Of-ficial Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 3rd Revision. AOAC International.

  • Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levang-Brilz, N., Biondini, M.E. Growth rate, root development and nutrient uptake of 55 plant species from the Great Plains Grasslands, USA. Plant Ecology 165, 117–144 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021469210691

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021469210691

Navigation