Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phenotypic responses of the twining vine Ipomoea purpurea (Convolvulaceae) to physical support availability in sun and shade

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vines depend on external support to prevent shading by neighbouringplants. Hence, it is important to determine whether shading enhances thephenotypic responses of vines to support availability. I evaluated theconsequences of support availability (a vertical stake) on shoot and leaftraitsof the morning glory Ipomoea purpurea (Convolvulaceae)under full sunlight and extreme shade. It was hypothesised that phenotypicresponses of vines to support availability should be greater in the shade. Inaddition, to investigate possible constraints to such phenotypic responses, thecorrelations among phenotypic traits and the plasticity of such correlationswere evaluated. The phenotypic variation of the main stem length and of thenumber of branches was consistent with the hypothesis, i.e. greater responsestosupport availability in the shade. In contrast, both internode length and leafarea (two traits that showed a significant and positive correlation) decreasedin the sun and increased in the shade with support availability. Petiole lengthdecreased with support in the sun but had no response in the shade. On theotherhand, the number of significant trait correlations found in plants in the sunand supported plants was higher than those of shade and non-supported plants,respectively. Several of the correlations were significantly sensitive to theenvironment. Flowering only occurred in the sun treatment. Whereas no shoot orleaf trait was significantly correlated with flower number in supported plants,both petiole length and shoot biomass showed a significant correlation withsuchestimate of plant fitness in non-supported plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin D.F. and Huamán Z. 1996. A synopsis of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the Americas. Taxon 45: 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballaré C.L. 1994. Light gaps: sensing the light opportunities in highly dynamic canopy environments. In: Caldwell M.M. and Pearcy R.W. (eds), Exploitation of Heterogeneity by Plants. Academic Press, London, pp. 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz F.A. and Harper J.L. 1977. Demographic analysis of growth of Linum usitatissimum. New Phytologist 78: 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini D.F. and Schultz J.C. 1999. Exploring cost constraints on stem elongation in plants using phenotypic manipulation. American Naturalist 153: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C.R. 1875. The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Dubbelden K.C., Koen C. and Verburg R.W. 1996. Inherent allocation patterns and potential growth rates of herbaceous climbing plants. Plant and Soil 184: 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Dubbelden K.C. and Oosterbeek B. 1995. The availability of external support affects allocation patterns and morphology of herbaceous climbing plants. Functional Ecology 9: 628–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley S.A. and Schmitt J. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147: 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison A.M. and Niklas K.J. 1988. Branching patterns of Salicornia europaea (Chenopodiaceae) at different successional stages: a comparison of theoretical and real plants. American Journal of Botany 75: 501–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • French J.C. 1977. Growth relationships of leaves and internodes in viny angiosperms with different modes of attachment. American Journal of Botany 64: 292–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner B.L. 1991a. Structural stability and architecture of vines vs. shrubs of poison oak, Toxicodendron diversilobum. Ecology 72: 2005–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner B.L. 1991b. Relative growth rate of vines and shrubs of western poison oak, Toxicodendron diversilobum (Anacardiaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1345–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianoli E. 2001. Lack of differential plasticity to shading of internodes and petioles with growth habit in Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1247–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianoli E. and Hannunen S. 2000. Plasticity of leaf traits and insect herbivory in Solanum incanum L. (Solanaceae) in Nguruman, SW Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 38: 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber H. 1996. Plasticity of internodes and petioles in prostrate and erect Potentilla species. Functional Ecology 10: 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber H., Fijan A. and During H.J. 1998. A comparative study of spacer plasticity in erect and stoloniferous herbs. Oikos 81: 576–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L. and Klimešová J. 1994. Biomass allocation in a clonal vine: effects of intraspecific competition and nutrient availability.Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 29: 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson K.C. 2000. Circumnutation behavior of an exotic honeysuckle vine and its native congener: influence on clonal mobility.American Journal of Botany 87: 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechowicz M.J. and Blais P.A. 1988. Assessing the contributions of multiple interacting traits to plant reproductive success: environmental dependence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1: 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matista A.A. and Silk W.K. 1997. An electronic device for continuous, in vivo measurement of forces exerted by twining vines. American Journal of Botany 84: 1164–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthei O. 1995. Manual De Las Malezas Que Crecen en Chile. Alfabeta, Santiago.

  • Peñalosa J. 1983. Shoot dynamics and adaptive morphology of Ipomoea phillomega (Vell.) House (Convolvulaceae), a tropical rainforest liana. Annals of Botany 52: 737–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M. and Schlichting C.D. 1995. Ontogenetic reaction norms in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae): response to shading. Ecology 76: 2134–2144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M. and Schlichting C.D. 1996. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. IV. Relationships between plasticity and fitness. Heredity 76: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M., Schlichting C.D. and Whitton J. 1995. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. II Response to stress and unordered environmental variation. Functional Ecology 9: 537–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntieri J.G. and Pyšek P. 1993. The effects of physical support and density on biomass production and size hierarchies of Galium aparine populations. Oikos 66: 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz F.E. 1984. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado island, Panamá. Ecology 65: 1713–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz F.E. and Chai P. 1987. Ecological studies of lianas in Lamber national park, Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Ecology 75: 523–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz F.E. and Holbrook N.M. 1991. Biomechanical studies of vines. In: Putz F.E. and Mooney H.A. (eds), The Biology of Vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz F.E. and Mooney H.A. 1991. The Biology of Vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray T.S. 1992. Foraging behaviour in tropical herbaceous climbers (Araceae). Journal of Ecology 80: 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 17: 667–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting C.D. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity in Phlox. II. Plasticity of character correlations. Oecologia 78: 496–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting C.D. and Pigliucci M. 1995. Lost in phenotypic space: environment-dependent morphology in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 542–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting C.D. and Pigliucci M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland.

  • Schmitt J. and Wulff R.D. 1993. Light spectral quality, phytochrome, and plant competition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J.A. and Larson K.C. 1999. Greater morphological plasticity of exotic honeysuckle species may make them better invaders than native species. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk W.K. and Hubbard W.K. 1991. Axial forces and normal distributed loads in twinning stems of morning glory. Journal of Biomechanics 24: 599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. Freeman, New York.

  • Stanton M.L., Roy B.A. and Thiede D.A. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54: 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan S.E., Wilczek A.M., Bell D.L. and Hand G. 1998. Physiological response to complex environments in annual Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Oecologia 115: 564–578.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile

    Ernesto Gianoli & Ernesto Gianoli

Authors
  1. Ernesto Gianoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Gianoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gianoli, E. Phenotypic responses of the twining vine Ipomoea purpurea (Convolvulaceae) to physical support availability in sun and shade. Plant Ecology 165, 21–26 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021412030897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021412030897

Search

Navigation