Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public policy literature has paid little attention to evaluating the ability of voluntary environmental programs to generate economic benefits for firms. Yet, given their voluntary nature, provision of economic benefits to firms is a necessary condition for these programs to become effective environmental policy instruments. Additionally, little is known about why firms operating in developing countries would participate in these initiatives.

This paper provides some of the first cross-sectional empirical evidence about voluntary environmental programs established in developing countries. Specifically, the paper focuses on studying hotel participation in the Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism (CST program). The CST program is probably the first performance-based voluntary environmental program created by a developing country government. Results indicate that hotels with certified superior environmental performance show a positive relationship with differentiation advantages that yield price premiums. Participation in the CST program alone is not significantly related to higher prices and higher sales. The evidence also indicates that participation in the CST program was significantly related to government monitoring, trade association membership and hotels’ focus on ‘green’ consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, R. (1998). ‘Environmental regulation and business self-regulation,’ Policy Sciences 31: 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and T. Cason (1996). ‘Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program,’ Land Economics 72: 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and S. Gangopadhyay (1995). ‘Toward a theoretical model of emissions control,’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28: 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, T. and K. Roth (2000). ‘Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness,’ Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,’ Journal of Management 17: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. and W. Hesterley (1996). ‘Organizational economics: Understanding the relationships between organizations and economic analysis,’ in Clregg, Hardy and Nord, eds., Handbook of Organizational Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 115–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh and R. E. Welsch (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. NewYork: John Willey and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, B. and A. Becker (1998). The New Key to Costa Rica. Berkeley, CA: Ulysses Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bien, A. (2000). Director: Costa Rican Association of Private Reserves. Interview by author, San Jose, Costa Rica.

  • Boo, E. (1990). Ecotourism: The Potential and Pitfalls. Washington, D.C.: World Wildlife Fund, pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, H. and L. O'Toole (1998). ‘The selection of policy instruments: A network-based perspective,’ Journal of Public Policy 18 (3): 213–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B. and I. Vertinisky (2000). ‘Policy networks and firm behaviors: Governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management,’ Policy Sciences 33: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (1997). Environmental Strategies of Multinational Companies: Determinants and Ejects on Competitive Advantage. Ph. D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and P. Cohen (1983). Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. (1991). ‘A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?’ Journal of Management 17: 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. and S. Cahill (1999). Environmental Implications of the Tourism Industry. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSharzo, J. R. and L. Vega (1999). The Importance of Public Protected Areas in the Development of Tourism in Costa Rica: An Analysis of Visit. Cambridge: Harvard Institute for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diericks, I. and K. Cool (1989). ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,’ Management Science 35: 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983). ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,’ American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1991). 'The new institutionalism in organizational analysis,’ Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, B. (ed.) (1998). Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. (1995). ‘Is cooperation the answer? Canadian environmental enforcement in comparative context,’ Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management 14 (2): 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. (1999). ‘Talking with the donkey: Cooperative approaches to environmental protection,’ Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (3): 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1995). ‘A natural resource based view of the firm,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. S. (1988). ‘Self-selection bias in the evaluation of voluntary energy conservation programs,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error,’ Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1978). ‘Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system,’ Econometrica 46 (6): 931–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky (1996). ‘The determinants of an environmental responsive firm: An empirical approach,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highley, C.J. and F. Leveque (eds.) 2001. Environmental Voluntary Approaches: Research Insights for Policy-Makers. Itally: Fundazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1999). ‘Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry,’ Academy of Management Journal 42: 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J., J. Nash and J. Enrenfeld (2000). ‘Standard or Smokescreen? Implementation of a voluntary environmental code,’ California Management Review 42 (2): 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (1991). ‘Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice,’ Policy Studies Journal 19 (2): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. and M. Ramesh (1995). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. and M. Ramesh (1993). ‘Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience,’ Policy Studies Review 12 (1): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICT (1995). Strategic Sustainable Development Plan for the Costa Rican Tourism Sector, 1995–1999. San Jose, Costa Rica.

  • ICT (1999). Costa Rican Institute of Tourism: Annual Report of Statistics,1999. San Jose, Costa Rica.

  • INCAE (2000). Tourism in Costa Rica: A Competitive Challenge. Costa Rica.

  • Jaffe, A. B., S. R. Peterson and P. R. Portney (1995). ‘Environmental regulation and competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing,’ Journal of Economic Literature 33: 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. and P. Zandbergen (1995). ‘Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 1015–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., C. Inman, L. Pratt, N. Mesa and J. Rivera (2001). ‘Issues in the design of a green certification program for tourism,’ in T. Panayotou (2001), Environment for Growth in Central America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M. (2001). ‘Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection,’ Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (3): 291–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M. and L. Damon (1999). ‘EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M., W. H. Quimio and D. Bojilova (1998). ‘Toxics release information: A policy tool for environmental protection,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. and M. Lenox (2000). ‘Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry responsible care program,’ Academy of Management Journal 43: 698–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D. and C. P. McLaughlin (1996). ‘The impact of environmental management on firm performance,’ Management Science 42: 1199–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. and A. Prakash (forthcoming). ‘EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO-14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany,’ Policy Sciences.

  • Kraft, M. E. and N. J. Vig (1997). Environmental Policy in the 1990s (3rd ed.).Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. and R. P. Trost (1978). ‘Estimation of some limited dependent variable models with application to housing demand,’ Journal of Econometrics 8: 357–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. and B. Peters (1989). ‘Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts,’ Journal of Public Policy 9 (1): 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizano, R. (2001). Director: Certification for Sustainable Tourism Interview by author. San Jose, Costa Rica.

  • Lyon, T. P. and J. W. Maxwell (1999). ‘Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: An overview,’ in M. Franzini and A. Nicita, eds., Environmental Economics: Past, Present and Future. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.-S. (1983). Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. and J. Walsh (2001). People and Profits? The Search for a Link between Company's Social and Financial Performance. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977). ‘Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony,’ American Journal of Sociology 80: 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, N. and C. Inman (1999). Tourism in Costa Rica: A Competitive Challenge. Costa Rica: INCAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montabon, F. et al. (2000). ‘ISO-14000: Assessing its perceived impact on corporate performance,’ The Journal of Supply Chain Management (Spring): 4–16.

  • Motta, R., R. Huber and J. Ruitenbeek (1999). ‘Market based instruments for environmental policy making in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons from eleven countries,’ Environment and Development Economics 4: 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Public Administration (1995). Setting Priorities, Getting Results: A New Direction for the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: NAPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Bohm,V.( 1999). ‘Stimulating “green” technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms,’ Policy Sciences 32: 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, A. D. and W. Smith (1996). The Berkeley Guide for Central America (2nd ed.). New York: Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. (1980). ‘A least squares correction for selectivity bias,’ Econometrica 48 (7): 1815–1820.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA (1995). Environmental Policy Tools: A User's Guide. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K., W. E. Oates and P. R. Portney (1995). ‘Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and C. van der Linde (1995a). ‘Green and competitive,’ Harvard Business Review (September-October): 149–163.

  • Porter, M. and C. van der Linde (1995b). ‘Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pregibon, D. (1981). ‘Logistic regression diagnostics,’ The Annals of Statistics 9: 705–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachowiecki, R. (1997). The Lonely Planet Guide: Costa Rica (3rd ed.). Hong Kong: Lonely Planet Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R. and R. DeFillippi (1990). ‘Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustained competitive advantage,’ Academy of Management Review 15: 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). ‘Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy,’ California Management Review 40 (4): 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. (1998). ‘Public private partnerships: The tourism industry in Costa Rica,’ in B. Gentry, Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. and G. Royston (1997). ‘Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Towards a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption,’ Academy of Management Review 22: 346–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood, C. ( 1998). Fodor's 99: Costa Rica Travel Guide. New York: Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D and M. Berry (2000). ‘Corporate environmental management and public policy: Bridging the gap,’ The American Behavioral Scientist 44 (2): 168–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. and P. Fouts (1997). ‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability,’ Academy of Management Journal 40: 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, L. (1981). ‘Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action,’ Public Policy 29 (3): 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya (2001). ‘Does doing good always leads to doing better? Comsumer reactions to corporate social responsibility,’ Journal of Marketing Research 38: 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K. and T. Miceli (1998). ‘Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for environmental protection?’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. and H. Ingram (1990). ‘Behavioral assumptions of policy tools,’ The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 510–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and H. Vredenburg (1998). ‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities,’ Strategic Management Journal 19: 729–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik,M. and A. Marcus (2000). ‘Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead,’ Academy of Management Journal 43: 539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ravenswaay, E. and J. Blend (1999). ‘Using ecolabeling to encourage adoption of innovative environmental technologies in agriculture,’ in F. Casey et al., eds., Flexible Incentives for the Adoption of Environmental Technologies in Agriculture. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videras, J. and A. Alberini (2000). ‘The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: Which firms participate and why?’ Contemporary Economic Policy 18 (4), 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N. and B. Whitehead (1994). ‘It's not easy being green,’ Harvard Business Review 72 (3): 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmeyer, W. and Y. Mulugetta (1999). Growing Pains: Environmental Management in Developing Countries. Shiffield, U.K.: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E., A. Mazur and S. Bretschneider (2000). ‘Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoption and contribution of the Climate Challenge Program to the reduction of carbon dioxide,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (3): 407–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). ‘A resource-based view of the firm,’ Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. A. (1980). ‘Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and direct test for heteroskedasticity,’ Econometrica 48: 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildes, F. T. (1998). Influence of Ecotourism on Conservation Policy for Sustainable Development: The Case of Costa Rica. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. and B. Barbock (1999). ‘The relative efficiency of voluntary vs mandatory environmental regulations,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, USA

    Jorge Rivera

Authors
  1. Jorge Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivera, J. Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism. Policy Sciences 35, 333–360 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021371011105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021371011105

Keywords

Search

Navigation