Skip to main content
Log in

Potential Non-target Effects of a Biological Control Agent, Prickly Pear Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in North America, and Possible Management Actions

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), the poster child of biological control, has recently invaded the United States. The first US record was at Big Pine Key, Florida, in 1989. Since then it has moved rapidly northward into South Carolina. Fears are high that it will disperse, either on its own, or with human help, into the US desert southwest and Mexico. There are at least 31 species of prickly pear in the US that are likely to be attacked by Cactoblastis and 56 species in Mexico. As well as the threat to wild cacti, there are over 250,000 ha of Opuntia plantations in Mexico that support a thriving agricultural industry, most of which is centered on harvesting fruits or pads. Possible control measures include classical biological control using parasitoids or pathogens from South America, chemical control or F1 sterility, as has been used successfully for the codling moth. However, most of these options appear to have insurmountable difficulties. Classical biological control raises the fear of further non-target effects of natural enemies on native cactus herbivores. Chemical control has potential non-target effects on other (rare) insects and is expensive. F1 sterility is also expensive and is not self-sustaining, requiring considerable and continual human input. Nevertheless, research on control options is vital as is further work on the rate of spread and impact of Cactoblastis in the United States Southeast, so that we can be as well prepared as possible to deal with this threat when it arrives in Arizona, California, and Mexico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett FD and Habeck DH (1992) Cactoblastis cactorum: a successful weed control agent in the Caribbean, now a pest in Florida? In: Delfosse ES and Scott RR (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, pp 21–26. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem S, Bloem KA, Carpenter JE and Calkins CO (1999a) Inherited sterility in codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of substerilizing doses of radiation on field competitiveness. Environmental Entomology 28: 669–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem S, Bloem KA, Carpenter JE and CalkinsCO(1999b) Inherited sterility in the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of substerilizing doses of radiation on insect fecundity, fertility and control. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92: 222–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JE, Bloem KA and Bloem S (2001) Applications of F1 sterility for research and management of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomologist 54: 531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickel TS (1991) Cactoblastis cactorum in Florida (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae). Tropical Lepidoptera (Gainesville) 2: 117–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd AP (1940) The biological campaign against prickly pear. Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board Bulletin, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer MA (1991) Conservancy acts to manage cactus moth at Torchwood Hammock Reserve. Florida Keys Initiative, The Nature Conservancy Newsletter, Winter 1991

  • Fullaway DT (1954) Biological control of cactus in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 47: 696–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeck DH and Bennett FD (1990) Cactoblastis cactorum Berg (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), a phycitine new to Florida. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industries, Entomology Circular 333

  • Hernandez LR and Emmel TC (1993) Cactoblastis cactorum in Cuba. Tropical Lepidoptera 4: 45–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hight SO, Carpenter JE, Bloem KA, Bloem S, Pemberton RW and Stiling P (2002) Expanding geographical range of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in North America. Florida Entomologist (in press)

  • Irish M (2001) The ornamental prickly pear industry in the southwestern United States. Florida Entomologist 84: 484–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM and Stiling PD (1996) Host specificity of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Environmental Entomology 28: 743–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM and Stiling PD (1998) Distribution and dispersal of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth in Florida. Florida Entomologist 81: 12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien MH and Griffiths MW (eds) (1998) Biological Control of Weeds: a World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds, 4th ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibee GL and Osborne LS (2001) Chemical control of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomologist 84: 510–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann J (1969) Cactus-feeding insects and mites. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 256: 1–158

    Google Scholar 

  • North DT (1975) Inherited sterility in lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 20: 167–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton RW (1995) Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the United States, an immigrant biological control agent or an introduction of the nursery industry? American Entomologist 41: 230–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton RW and Cordo HA (2001a) Potential and risks of biological control of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in North America. Florida Entomologist 84: 513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton RW and Cordo HA (2001b) Nosema (Microsporida: Nosematidae) species as potential biological control agents of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): surveys of the Microporidia in Argentina and South Africa. Florida Entomologist 84: 527–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettey FW (1948) The biological control of prickly pear in South Africa. Science Bulletin, Department of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa 271: 1–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce RL (1995) Infestation of Opuntia by the Phycitid Moths Melitara prodenialis and Cactoblastis cactorum. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • PretoriusMW and Van ark H (1992) Further insecticide trials for the control of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as well as Dactylopius opuntiae (Homiptera: Dactylopiidae) on spineless cactus. Phytophylatica 24: 229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebman JP and Pinkava DJ (2001) Opuntia cacti of North America – an overview. Florida Entomologist 84: 474–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HG (1987) Oviposition site selection in Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera): constraints and compromises. Oecologia 73: 601–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds FJ and Bennett FD (1966) Biological control of Opuntia spp. by Cactoblastis cactorum in the Leeward Islands (West Indies). Entomophaga 11: 183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberon J, Golubov J and Sarukhan J (2001) The importance of Opuntia in Mexico and routes of invasion and impact of Cactoblastis cactorum. Florida Entomologist 84: 486–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Aberdeen V and Lachance M (1988) The yeast community associated with decaying Opuntia stricta (Haworth) in Florida with regard to the moth Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg). Florida Scientist 51: 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P and Moon DC (2001) Protecting rare Florida cacti from attack by the exotic cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomologist 84: 506–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P, Rossi A and Gordon D (2000) The difficulties of single factor thinking in restoration: replacing a rare cactus in the Florida Keys. Biological Conservation 94: 327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuduri JCG, Martorell LF and Gaud SM (1971) Geographical distribution and host plants of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg), in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands. Journal of Agricultural University, Puerto Rico 58: 130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Viguera SAL and Portillo L (2001) Uses of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) and the potential impact of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Mexico. Florida Entomologist 84: 493–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman HG, McFadyen RE and Erb HE (1979) Annotated list of some cactus-feeding insects of South America. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 32: 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman HG, Moran VC and Hoffmann JA(2000) The renowned cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum: its natural history and threat to native Opuntia floras in Mexico and the United States of America. Diversity and Distributions 6: 259–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stiling, P. Potential Non-target Effects of a Biological Control Agent, Prickly Pear Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in North America, and Possible Management Actions. Biological Invasions 4, 273–281 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020988922746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020988922746

Navigation