Skip to main content
Log in

The Diagonal and the Demon

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliabilism about epistemic justification – thethesis that what makes a belief epistemicallyjustified is that it was produced by a reliableprocess of belief-formation – must face twoproblems. First, what has been called ``the newevil demon problem'', which arises from the ideathat the beliefs of victims of an evil demonare as justified as our own beliefs, althoughthey are not – the objector claims – reliablyproduced. And second, the problem of diagnosingwhy skepticism is so appealing despite beingfalse. I present a special version ofreliabilism, ``indexical reliabilism'', based ontwo-dimensional semantics, and show how it cansolve both problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Chalmers, D. (1996): The Conscious Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1984): 'Justification and Truth', Philosophical Studies 46, 279-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (1998): 'The Generality Problem for Reliabilism', Philosophical Studies 89(1), 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elga, A. (MS): 'Defeating Dr. Evil with Self-Locating Belief', unpublished.

  • Evans, G. (1979): 'Reference and Contingency', The Monist 62(2). Reprinted in Evans (1985), 178-213.

  • Evans, G. (1985): Collected Papers, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. (1993): Working Without a Net, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1991): 'Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology', in his Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1999): 'A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology', Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 13: Epistemology, pp. 1-28.

  • Kaplan, D. (1989): 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 481-563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1970): 'Anselm and Actuality', Nous 4. Reprinted with Postscripts in Lewis (1983), 10-20.

  • Lewis, D. (1973): Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1983): Philosophical Papers Volume I, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (1991): Knowledge in Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (1993): 'Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology', Nous 27(1), 51-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (forthcoming): 'Goldman's Reliabilism and Virtue Epistemology', Philosophical Topics.

  • Stalnaker, R. (1978): 'Assertion', in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999), pp. 78-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1999): Context and Content, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comesaña, J. The Diagonal and the Demon. Philosophical Studies 110, 249–266 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020656411534

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020656411534

Keywords

Navigation