Abstract
While computation by ensemble synchronization is considered to be a robust and efficient way for information processing in the cortex (C. Von der Malsburg and W. Schneider (1986) Biol. Cybern. 54: 29–40; W. Singer (1994) Inter. Rev. Neuro. 37: 153–183; J.J. Hopfield (1995) Nature 376: 33–36; E. Vaadia et al. (1995) Nature 373: 515–518), the neuronal mechanisms that might be used to achieve it are yet to be uncovered. Here we analyze a neural network model in which the computations are performed by near coincident firing of neurons in response to external inputs. This near coincident firing is enabled by activity dependent depression of inter-neuron connections. We analyze the network behavior by using a mean-field approximation, which allows predicting the network response to various inputs. We demonstrate that the network is very sensitive to temporal aspects of the inputs. In particular, periodically applied inputs of increasing frequency result in different response profiles. Moreover, applying combinations of different stimuli lead to a complex response, which cannot be easily predicted from responses to individual components. These results demonstrate that networks with synaptic depression can perform complex computations on time-dependent inputs utilizing the ability to generate temporally synchronous firing of single neurons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB (1997) Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275: 220–224.
Abeles M (1991) Corticonics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Abeles M, Prut Y (1996) Spatio-temporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. J. Physiol. Paris 90(3/4): 249–250.
deCharms RC, Blake DT, Merzenich MM (1998) Optimizing sounds features for cortical neurons. Science 280: 1439–1443.
deCharms RC, Merzenich MM (1996) Primary cortical representation of sounds by the coordination of action-potential timing. Nature 381(6583): 610–613.
Gray CM, Konig P, Engel AK, Singer W (1989) Oscillatory responses in visual cortex exhibit intercolumnar synchronization which re-flects global stimulus properties. Nature 338: 334–337.
Grossberg S (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms and architectures. Studies in Applied Mathematics 52: 217–257.
Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C (1995) Synchrony in excitatory neural network. Neural Comp. 7: 307–337.
Heil P (1997) Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. Firstspike timing. J. Neurophysiol. 77(5): 2616–2641.
Hopfield JJ (1995) Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation. Nature 376: 33–36.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (London) 160: 106–154.
Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM (1998) Plasticity of temporal information processing in the primary auditory cortex. Nature Neuro. 1: 727–731.
Latham PE, Richmond BJ, Nelson PG, Nirenberg S (2000) Intrinsic dynamics in neuronal networks. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 808–827.
Mirollo RE, Strogartz SH (1990) Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 6: 1645–1647.
Murphy JT, Kwan HC, Wong YC (1985) Cross-correlation studies in primate motor cortex: Synaptic interaction and shared input. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 12: 11–23.
Nelken I, Rotman Y, Bar-yosef O (1999) Responses of auditory cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds. Nature 397: 154–157.
Phillips D, Sark S (1991) Separate mechanisms control spike numbers and inter-spike intervals in transient responses of cat auditory cortex neurons. Hearing Research 53: 17–27.
Riehle A, Grun S, Diesman M, Aertsen A (1997) Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science 278: 1950–1953.
Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. Spartan, Washington, DC.
Singer W (1994) Coherence as an organizing principle of cortical functions. Inter. Rev. Neuro. 37: 153–183.
Treves A (1993) Mean-field analysis of neuronal spike dynamics. Network 4: 259–284.
Tsodyks M, Markram H (1997) The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. PNAS 94: 719–723.
Tsodyks M, Pawelzik K, Markram H (1998) Neural networks with dynamic synapses. Neural Computation 10: 821–835.
Tsodyks M, Uziel A, Markram H (2000) Synchorony generation in recurrent networks with frequency-dependent synapses. J. Neurosci. 20RC1: 1–5.
Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology. Cambridge, UP, New York.
Vaadia E, Aertsen A (1992) Coding and computation in the cortex: Single-neuron activity and cooperative phenomena. In: A Aertsen, V Braitenberg, eds. Information Processing in the Cortex. Springer, Berlin, pp. 81–121.
Vaadia E, Haalman I, Abeles M, Bergman H, Prut Y, Slovin H, Aertsen A (1995) Dynamics of neuronal interactions in monkey cortex in relation to behavioral events. Nature 373: 515–518.
van Vreeswijk C, Abbott LF, Ermentrout GB (1994) When inhibition not excitation synchronizes neural firing. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1: 313–321.
van Vreeswijk C, Hansel D (2001) Patterns of synchrony in neural networks with spike adaptation. Neural Computation 13: 959–992.
Villa A, Tetko IV, Hyland B, Najem A (1999) Spatiotemporal activity patterns of rat cortical neurons predict responses in a conditioned task. PNAS 96: 1106–1111.
Von der Malsburg C, Schneider W (1986) A neural cocktail-party processor. Biol. Cybern. 54: 29–40.
Wilson HR, Cowan JD (1972) Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys. Journal 12: 1–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loebel, A., Tsodyks, M. Computation by Ensemble Synchronization in Recurrent Networks with Synaptic Depression. J Comput Neurosci 13, 111–124 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020110223441
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020110223441