Skip to main content
Log in

Similarity of Percolation Thresholds on the HCP and FCC Lattices

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed in order to determine the precise values of the critical thresholds for site (p hcp cS =0.199 255 5±0.000 001 0) and bond (p hcp cB =0.120 164 0±0.000 001 0) percolation on the hcp lattice to compare with previous precise measurements on the fcc lattice. Also, exact enumeration of the hcp and fcc lattices was performed and yielded generating functions and series for the zeroth, first, and second moments of both lattices. When these series and the values of p c are compared to those for the fcc lattice, it is apparent that the site percolation thresholds are different; however, the bond percolation thresholds are equal within error bars, and the series only differ slightly in the higher order terms, suggesting the actual values are very close to each other, if not identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, An Introduction to Percolation Theory, Revised 2nd ed. (Taylor and Francis, London, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory (Taylor and Francis, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Y. Tarasevich and S. C. van der Marck, An investigation of site-bond percolation on many lattices, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 10:1193 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. C. van der Marck, Percolation thresholds and universal formulas, Phys. Rev. E 55, 1514 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. D. Lorenz and R. M. Ziff, Universality of the excess number of clusters and the crossing probability function in three-dimensional percolation, J. Phys. A 31:8147 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. D. Lorenz and R. M. Ziff, Precise determination of the bond percolation thresholds and finite-size scaling corrections for the sc, fcc, and bcc lattices, Phys. Rev. E 57:230 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Bocquet, Percolative diffusion of a dumbbell interstitial defect on a fcc lattice: Calculation of a percolation threshold with the use of a series method, Phys. Rev. B 50:16386 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Ziff, P. T. Cummings, and G. Stell, Generation of percolation cluster perimeters by a random-walk, J. Phys. A 17:3009 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. E. Fisher, The theory of condensation and the critical point, Ann. Phys. (NY) 3:255 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Ziff and G. Stell, Critical behavior in three-dimensional percolation: Is the percolation threshold a Lifshitz point?, University of Michigan Report No. 88-4, (1988).

  12. H. G. Ballesteros, L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, A. M. Sudupe, G. Parisi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Scaling corrections: site percolation and Ising model in three dimensions, J. Phys. A 32:1 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Redner, A FORTRAN program for cluster enumeration, J. Stat. Phys. 29:309 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mertens, Lattice animals: A fast enumeration algorithm and new perimeter polynomials, J. Stat. Phys. 58:1095 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, C.D., May, R. & Ziff, R.M. Similarity of Percolation Thresholds on the HCP and FCC Lattices. Journal of Statistical Physics 98, 961–970 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018648130343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018648130343

Navigation