Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The early interactions between plant, animal, and human ecology in the 1920s in the United States provide an initial basis for understanding and directing an integrated ecosystem approach to the study of sociocultural and biophysical patterns and processes of present day cities. However, whereas the human ecology approach of the 1920s and 30s was interested in metaphorical similarities with plant and animal ecologists, we propose a more integrated approach to human ecosystem observation and analysis. A critical feature to an integrated, urban ecosystem approach is the ability of researchers to address the spatial heterogeneity of urban ecosystems; i.e. the development and dynamics of spatial heterogeneity and the influences of spatial patterns on cycles and fluxes of critical resources (e.g. energy, materials, nutrients, genetic and nongenetic information, population, labor, and capital). An important question in this context is how differential access to and control over critical resources affect the structure and function of urban ecosystems.

To address this heterogeneity, we illustrate a human ecosystem and landscape approach and how the concept of social differentiation can be applied spatially at different scales with a case study from our research in Baltimore, Maryland. Further, we identify different methods, tools, and techniques that can be used for an integrated, urban ecosystem approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. A. (1987) Place and politics: the geographical mediation of state and society. Allen & Unwin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alihan, M. A. (1938) Social ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H. and Starr, T. B. (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. and Mulcahy, P. (1972) Sociocultural versus neoclassical ecology: a contribution to the problem of scope in sociology. Sociol.Quart. 13(Winter), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1967) The City, the Suburb, and a Theory of Social Choice. In The new urbanization (S. Greer, ed.), pp. 132–168. St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1997) Foundations of futures studies: human science for a new era. Transaction Publishers, New Bruns-wick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. E. (1991) Watershed hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F. H. and Likens, G. (1979) Patterns and processes in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. B. (1990) Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1991) Environment and economy: property rights & public policy. TJ Press, Cornwall, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr. (1971) Daydreams and nightmares: a sociological essay on the American environment. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R. (1988) Human ecology and environmental management. In Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness (J. K. Agee and R. J. Darryll, eds.), pp. 145–159. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R. J. (1978) Handbook for assessing energy-society relations. School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr., Cheek, N. H., Jr. and Taylor, L., eds. (1972) Social behavior, natural resources, and the environment. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr. and DeLuca, D. R. (1984) Measuring the social impact of natural resource policies. New Mexico University Press, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr. and Grove, J. M. (1993) People, trees and participation on the urban frontier. Unasylva 44(173), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R. J. and Grove, J. M. (1996) Life on the city streets – some lessons from Baltimore for reaching out to grow trees, kids, and communities. J.Public Serv.Outreach 1(2), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr. and Parker, J. K., eds. (1992) Social science applications in Asian agroforestry. IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1925) The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. In The city (R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess and R. D. McKenzie, eds.), pp. 47–62. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr. (1992) Separation versus unification in sociological human ecology. In Advances in human ecology (L. Freese, ed.), Volume 1, pp. 65–99. JAI Press, Greenwich, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994) Foundation of human ecology. Sociol.Perspect. 37(1), 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. M. (Ed.). (1991) Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. (1905) Research methods in ecology. University Printing Co., Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation (Publication No. 242). Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. R. (1986) Agroecosystems analysis for research and development. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1991) Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. W. W. Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, D. (1859) The origin of species. D. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C. N. (1991) In search of human nature: the decline and revival of Darwinism in American social thought. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1959) Human ecology and population studies. In The study of population (P. M. Hauser and O. D. Duncan, eds.), pp. 678–716. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1961) From social system to ecosystem. Sociol.Inquiry 31, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1964) Social organization and the ecosystem. In Handbook of Modern Sociology (R. E. L. Faris ed.), pp. 37–82. Rand McNally & Co., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. and Leopold, L. B. (1978) Water in environmental planning. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, D. R. and Burch, W. R., Jr., eds. (1988) Rural sociology and the environment. Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Firey, W. (1945) Sentiment and symbolism as ecological variables. Am.Sociol.Rev. 10, 140–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firey, W. (1947) Land use in central Boston. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L. (1986) The role of local institutions in communal area development in Botswana (Research Paper no. 91). University of Wisconsin Land Tenure Center, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L. and Bruce, J. W. eds. (1988) Whose trees?: proprietary dimensions of forestry. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1992) The problem of scale in community resource management. Environ.Manage. 16(3), 289-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. P. and Kasarda, J. D. (1988) Spatial processes. In Handbook of sociology (N. J. Smelser ed., pp. 629-667. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, A. (1981) Forms of explanation: rethinking the questions in social theory. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettys, W. E. (1940) Human ecology and social theory. Social Forces XVIII, 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F. B. (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: more than the sum of the parts. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1978) The celebration of heroes: prestige as a social control system. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1994) In the mind of the beholder. Nat.Hist. 2, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1995) Dinosaur in a haystack: reflections in natural history. Harmony Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. M. (1995) Excuse me, could I speak to the property owner, please? Comm.Prop.Res.Dig. 35, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. M. (1996) The relationship between patterns and processes of social stratification and vegetation of an urban-rural watershed. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. M. (1997) New tools for exploring theory and methods in human ecosystem and landscape analyses: computer modeling, remote sensing and geographic information systems. In Integrating Social Sciences and Ecosystem Management. (H. K. Cordell & J. C. Bergstrom (eds.), Champaign, Sagamore. (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. M. and Hohmann, M. (1992) GIS and social forestry. J.Forestry 90, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. M., Vachta, K., McDonough, M. and Burch, W. R., Jr., eds. (1994) The urban resources initiative: community benefits from forestry. (Vol. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-163). USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusky, D. B., ed. (1994) Social stratification: class, race & gender in sociological perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (1977) Residential segregation in urban areas. In Contemporary Topics in urban sociology (K. P. Schwirian ed.) pp. 269–336. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. B. (1992) An entangled bank: the origins of ecosystem ecology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. D. and Ullman, E. L. (1945) The nature of cities. Ann.Am.Acad.Pol.Soc.Sci. 242:7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989) The urban experience. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1950) Human ecology: a theory of community structure. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1986) Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, J. D. and Nutter, W. L. (1969) An outline of forest hydrology. (revised ed.). University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1947) A re-examination of ecological theory. Sociol.Soc.Res. 31, 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. (1984) City form & natural process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, H. (1939) The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Federal Housing Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, S. and Michael, W. B. (1990) Handbook in research and evaluation: for education and the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Edits Publishers, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1976) Residential area characteristics: research methods for identifying urban subareas – social area analysis and factorial ecology. In Spatial Perspectives on Problems and Policies (D. T. Herbert and R. J. Johnston, eds.), Vol. 2, pp. 193–235. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, D. J. (1985) In the name of eugenics: genetics and the uses of human hereditary. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. G., Field, D. R. and Burch, W. R., Jr., eds. (1990) Community & forestry: continuities in the sociology of natural resources. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. E. (1966) Power and privilege: a theory of social stratification. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1993) Concepts of scale at the local level. In Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe (J. R. Ehleringer and C. B. Field (eds.), pp. 7–19. Academic Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. and Molotch, H. L. (1987) Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G. E. and Forester, D. J. (1994) The relationship between socio-economic factors and the loss of biodi-versity: first efforts at theoretical and quantitative models. In Biodiversity in managed landscapes: theory and practices. (R. Szaro (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G. E., Force, J. E., & Burch, W. R. Jr. (1997) The Human Ecosystem Part I: The Human Ecosystem as an Organizing Concept in Ecosystem Management. Society and Natural Resources, 10:347–367.

  • Machlis, G. E., Force, J. E., and Dalton, S. E. (1994) Monitoring social indicators for ecosystem management (Technical Paper 43-0E00-4-9186). Interior Columbia River Basin Project.

  • Malthus, T. R. (1798) An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society. J. Johnson, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1984) The sources of social power: volume 1, a history of power from the beginning to A.D.1760. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. D. (1989) The nature of politics. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. (1969) Design With Nature. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R. P. (1985) The background of ecology: concept and theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendry, J. E. and Machlis, G. E. (1993) The role of geography in extending biodiversity gap analysis. Appl.Geogr. 11, 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1925a) The ecological approach to the study of the human community. In The city (R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess and R. D. McKenzie, eds.), pp. 63–79. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1925b) The scope of human ecology. Paper presented at the American Sociological Society of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (1970) Man and his urban environment: a sociological approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. C. (1991) Handbook of research design and social measurement. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1974) The spatial organization of society. (2nd ed.). Duxbury Press, Duxbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B. and Allen, T. F. H. (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. (Vol. 23). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1936) Human ecology. Am.J.Sociol. 42, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W. and McKenzie, R. D. eds. (1925) The city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. K. (1994) Improving the contribution of forests to food security: a proposed conceptual framework for designing research studies and practical field interventions. Food and Agriculture Organization, Forestry Department/FOND, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. K. and Burch, W. R. J. (1992) Toward a social ecology for agroforestry in Asia. In Social science applications in Asian agroforestry (W. R. Burch, Jr. and J. K. Parker, eds.), (pp. 60–84). IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., Burch, W. R., Jr., Dalton, S., Foresman, T., Grove, J. M. and Rowntree, R. (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1(4), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L. (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A. and Ostfeld, R. S. (1995) The shifting paradigm in ecology. In A new century for natural resources management (R. L. Knight and S. F. Bates, eds.), pp. 261–278. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. (1991) The balance of nature?: ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (1997) Urban ecosystems: the human dimension. Urban Ecosystems 1, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. S. (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am.Sociol.Rev. 15, 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (1991) The origins of American social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • RRA, ed. (1987) Proceedings of the 1985 international conference of rapid rural appraisal. Rural Systems Research and Farming Systems Research Projects, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

  • Rusk, D. (1993) Cities without suburbs. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnore, L. F. (1958) Social morphology and human ecology. Am.J.Sociol. 63, 620–624, 629–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelford, V. E. (1913) Animal communities in temperate America as illustrated in the Chicago region. Bulletin of the Geographical Society of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevky, E. and Bell, W. (1955) Social area analysis: theory, illustrative application and computational procedure. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. (1964) This view of life. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1876) Principles of sociology. D. Appleton & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, A. W. (1984) The granite garden: urban nature and human design. Basic Books, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16, 284–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, D. (1971) The urban mosaic: towards a theory of residential differentiation. (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H., eds. (1990) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P. L. (1975) Man in society: a biosocial view. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M. (1994) Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75, 1861–1876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1984) Learning from the field: a guide from experience. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F., ed. (1991a) Participation action research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1991b) Social theory for action. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. (1988) Power: its forms, bases, and uses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (1974) Human ecology as an interdisciplinary concept: a critical inquiry. Adv.Ecol.Res. 8, 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (1992) Between the atom and the void: hierarchy in human ecology. In Advances in human ecology (L. Freese, ed.), Volume 1, pp. 119–147. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S. (1989) The land unit – a fundamental concept in landscape ecology and its applications. Landscape Ecol. 3, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S. (1990) Scope and concepts of landscape ecology as an emerging science. In Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective I. S. Zonneveld and R. T. T. Forman, eds.), pp. 3–20. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, South Burlington, VT, 05403, USA

    J. Morgan Grove

  2. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 205 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    William R. Burch Jr.

Authors
  1. J. Morgan Grove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William R. Burch Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grove, J.M., Burch, W.R. A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems 1, 259–275 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018591931544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018591931544

Search

Navigation