Skip to main content
Log in

Non-dietary factors as risk factors for breast cancer, and as effect modifiers of the association of fat intake and risk of breast cancer

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess more precisely the relative risks associated with established risk factors for breast cancer, and whether the association between dietary fat and breast cancer risk varies according to levels of these risk factors, we pooled primary data from six prospective studies in North America and Western Europe in which individual estimates of dietary fat intake had been obtained by validated food-frequency questionnaires. Based on information from 322,647 women among whom 4,827 cases occurred during follow-up: the multivariate-adjusted risk of late menarche (age15 years or more compared with under 12) was 0.72 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.62-0.82); of being postmenopausal was 0.82 (CI=0.69-0.97); of high parity (three or more births compared with none) was 0.72 (CI=0.61-0.86); of late age at first birth (over 30 years of age compared with 20 or under) was 1.46 (CI=1.22-1.75); of benign breast disease was 1.53 (CI=1.41-1.65); of maternal history of breast cancer was 1.38 (CI=1.14-1.67); and history of a sister with breast cancer was 1.47 (CI=1.27-1.70). Greater duration of schooling (more than high-school graduation compared with less than high-school graduation) was associated significantly with higher risk in age-adjusted analyses, but was attenuated after controlling for other risk factors. Total fat intake (adjusted for energy consumption) was not associated significantly with breast cancer risk in any strata of these non-dietary risk factors. We observed a marginally significant interaction between total fat intake and risk of breast cancer according to history of benign breast disease, with fat intake being associated nonsignificantly positively with risk among women with a previous history of benign breast disease; no other significant interactions were observed. Risks for reproductive factors were similar to those observed in case-control studies; relative risks for family history of breast cancer were lower. We found no clear evidence in any subgroups of a major relation between total energy-adjusted fat intake and breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelsey JL. Breast cancer epidemiology: Summary and future directions. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 256–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prentice RL, Sheppard L. Dietary fat and cancer: consis-tency of the epidemiologic data, and disease prevention that may follow from a practical reduction in fat consumption. Cancer Causes Control 1990; 1: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Dietary fat and cancer: another view. Cancer Causes Control 1990; 1: 103–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howe GR, Hirohata T, Hislop TG, et al. Dietary factors and risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control studies. JNCI 1990; 82: 561–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graham S, Marshall J, Mettlin C, et al. Diet in the epi-demiology of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howe GR. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk; an epi-demiologic perspective. Cancer (Suppl) 1994; 74: 1078–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami H-O, et al. Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer-a pooled analysis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 356–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howe GR, Friedenreich CM, Jain M, Miller AB. A cohort study of fat intake and risk of breast cancer. JNCI 1991; 83: 336–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, et al. Dietary fat and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer: an 8-year follow-up. JAMA 1992; 268: 2037–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graham S, Zielezny M, Marshall J, et al. Diet in the epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in the New York State cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 1327–37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Potter JD, et al. Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. JNCI 1992; 84: 1092–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. van den Brandt PA, van't Veer P, Goldbohm RA, et al. A prospective cohort study on dietary fat and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holmberg L, Ohlander EM, Byers T, et al. Diet and breast cancer risk: results from a population-based, case-control study in Sweden. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1805–11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mills PK, Beeson WL, Phillips RL, Fraser GE. Dietary habits and breast cancer incidence among Seventh Day Adventists. Cancer 1989; 64: 582–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. Reproduci-bility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort of women. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 319–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, et al. Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer: prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study. JAMA 1993; 270: 338–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986; 73: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Langholz B, Thomas DC. Nested case-control and case-cohort methods of sampling from a cohort: a critical comparison. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 169–76.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B 1972; 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT Software. The PHREG Procedure. Preliminary Documentation. Cary, NC (USA): SAS Institute, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirosoft International Corporation. EPICURE/PEANUTS Software. The PEANUTS Program. EPICURE User's Guide. Seattle, WA (USA): Hirosoft, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Floderus B, Barlow L, Mack TM. Recall bias in subjective reports of familial cancer. Epidemiology 1990; 1: 318–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Love RR, Evans AM, Josten DM. The accuracy of patient reports of a family history of cancer. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 289–93.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Layde PM, Webster LA, Baughman AL, et al. The independent associations of parity, age at first full term pregnancy, and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 963–73.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trichopoulos D, MacMahon B, Cole P. Menopause and breast cancer risk. JNCI 1972; 48: 605–13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. MacMahon B, Cole P, Lin TM, et al. Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull World Health Organ 1970; 43: 209–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bodian, CA. Benign breast diseases, carcinoma in situ, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith PG, Day NE. The design of case-control studies: the influence of confounding and interaction effects. Int J Epidemiol 1984; 13: 356–65.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rose DP, Boyer AP, Cohen L, et al. Effect of a low-fat diet on hormone levels in women with cystic breast disease. I. Serum steroids and gonadotropins. JNCI 1987; 78: 623–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, D.J., Spiegelman, D., Adami, HO. et al. Non-dietary factors as risk factors for breast cancer, and as effect modifiers of the association of fat intake and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 8, 49–56 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431104786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431104786

Navigation