Abstract
Within the traditional Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics, it is not possible to describe a particle as possessing, simultaneously, a sharp position value and a sharp momentum value. Is it possible, though, to describe a particle as possessing just a sharp position value (or just a sharp momentum value)? Some, such as Teller, have thought that the answer to this question is No – that the status of individual continuous quantities is very different in quantum mechanics than in classical mechanics. On the contrary, I shall show that the same subtle issues arise with respect to continuous quantities in classical and quantum mechanics; and that it is, after all, possible to describe a particle as possessing a sharp position value without altering the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J.: 1936, The logic of quantum mechanics, Ann. of Math. 37, 823–843.
Bub, J.: 1997, Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge University Press.
Bub, J. and Clifton, R.: 1996, A uniqueness theorem for ‘no-collapse’ interpretations of quantum mechanics, Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 27, 181–219.
Busch, P., Grabowski, M., and Lahti, P. J.: 1997, Operational Quantum Physics, Springer, New York.
Dalla Chiara, M. L.: 1994, Unsharp quantum logics, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 34, 1331–1336.
Dalla Chiara, M. L. and Giutini, R.: 1994, Partial and unsharp quantum logics, Found. Phys. 24, 1161–1177.
Clifton, R.: 1999, Beables in algebraic quantum theory, in J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–44.
Fine, A.: 1971, Probability in quantum mechanics and in other statistical theories, in M. Bunge (ed.), Problems in the Foundations of Physics, Springer, New York, pp. 79–92.
Foulis, D. J. and Bennett, M. K.: 1994, Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics, Found. Phys. 24, 1331–1352.
Garnir, H. G., DeWilde M., and Schmets, J.: 1968, Analyse Fonctionnelle: Théorie constructive des espaces linéaires à semi-normes, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Gleason, A. M.: 1957, Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space, J. Math. Mech. 6(6), 885–893.
Halvorson, H. and Clifton, R.: 1999, Maximal beable subalgebras of quantum mechanical observables, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 38, 2441–2484.
Hirsch, F. and Lacombe, G.: 1999, Elements of Functional Analysis, Springer, New York.
Just, W. and Weese, M.: 1991, Discovering Modern Set Theory, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.
Kadison, R. and Ringrose J.: 1997, Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.
Mackey, G. W.: 1968, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W.A. Benjamin, New York.
Moschovakis, Y. N.: 1994, Notes on Set Theory, Springer, New York.
Pincus, D. and Solovay, R. M.: 1977, Definability of measures and ultrafilters, J. Symbolic Logic 42, 179–190.
Schechter, E.: 1997, Handbook of Analysis and its Foundations, Academic Press, New York.
Summers, S. J.: (forthcoming), On the Stone–von Neumann uniqueness theorem and its ramifications, in M. Redei and M. Stoelzner (eds.), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.
Teller, P.: 1979, Quantum mechanics and the nature of continuous physical quantities, J. Philos. LXXVI, 345–361.
Varadarajan, V. S.: 1985, Geometry of Quantum Theory, Springer, New York.
von Neumann, J.: 1931, Die Eindeutigkeit der Schrödingerschen Operatoren, Math. Ann. 104, 570–578.
von Neumann, J.: 1932, Operatorenmethoden in der klassischen Mechanik, Ann. of Math. 33, 595–598.
von Neumann, J.: 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin.
Wright, J. D. M.: 1977, Functional analysis for the practical man, in K.-D. Bierstedt and B. Fuchssteiner (eds.), Functional Analysis: Surveys and Recent Results, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 283–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halvorson, H. On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30, 27–50 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017574203443
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017574203443