Skip to main content
Log in

A Social Contract for Biotechnology: Shared Visions for Risky Technologies?

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Future technological developmentsconcerning food, agriculture, and theenvironment face a gulf of social legitimationfrom a skeptical public and media, in the wakeof the crises of BSE, GM food, and foot andmouth disease in the UK (House of Lords, 2000). Keyethical issues were ignored by the bioindustry,regulators, and the Government, leaving alegacy of distrust. The paper examinesagricultural biotechnology in terms of a socialcontract, whose conditions would have to be fulfilled togain acceptance of novel applications. Variouscurrent and future GM applications areevaluated against these conditions. Successwould depend critically on how far a sharedvision can be found with the public. Tore-establish trust, significant changes areidentified in the planning and pursuit ofbiotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • House of Lords, Science and Society. Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (HMSO, London, 2000).

  • Bruce, D. M. and J. T. Eldridge, “The Role of Values in the GM Debate,” in M. P. Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Pape, and J. E. Tait (eds.), Foresight and Precaution (Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000), pp. 855–862.

  • Bruce, D. and A. Bruce (eds.), Engineering Genesis (Earthscan, London, 1999).

  • Church of Scotland, Reports to the General Assembly and Deliverances of the General Assembly 1999, The Society, Religion and Technology Project report on Genetically Modified Food, pp. 20/93–20/103, and Board of National Mission Deliverances 42-45, p. 20/4 (1999).

  • Adams, J., Risk (UCL Press, London, 1995).

  • Council for Biotechnology Information, Biotechnology Researchers Call It Golden Rice - for the Colour, for the Opportunity, advertising and information pack (Council for Biotechnology Information, Washington DC, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruce, D.M. A Social Contract for Biotechnology: Shared Visions for Risky Technologies?. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15, 279–289 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015738727342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015738727342

Navigation