Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of Market Efficiency: 103 Years Daily Data of the Dow

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autocorrelation in daily returns of the Dow 30 Index fluctuates significantly over time and reveals a declining trend after World War II. The relation between autocorrelation and volatility is negative and nonlinear. The relation between autocorrelation and volume is also negative and nonlinear. Returns exhibit positive autocorrelation during years with higher autocorrelation, and negative autocorrelation during years with lower autocorrelation. Positive autocorrelation appears more frequently during periods of low volatility, while negative autocorrelation appears more frequently during periods of high volatility. Current period's autocorrelation is related to previous period's autocorrelation and to both the previous and the current period's volatility and rate of return, which implies that investors incorporate previous period's pattern of market behavior into their trading strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alabiso, V., K. S. Tunney and C. Zoeller, Flash! The Associated Press Covers the World, The Associated Press and Harry N. Abrams, Inc. Publishers, 1998.

  • Albright, S. C., Statistics for Business and Economics, New York: Macmillan, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., R. Engle and J. Wooldridge, “A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time Varying Variance.” Journal of Political Economy 96, February, 116-131, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y. and L. Hentschel, “No News is Good News.” Journal of Financial Economics 31, 281-318, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman and J. Wang, “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 905-934, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, T. C., “Stock Returns and Conditional Variance-Covariance: Evidence from Asian Stock Markets,” in J. Jay Choi and John Doukas (Eds), Emerging Markets: Finance and Investments, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport, CT, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J., “How Big is the Random Walk in GNP?” Journal of Political Economy 96, 893-920, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment, Trading Around the Clock: Global Securities Markets and Information Technology, 1990.

  • Conrad, J. and G. Kaul, “Time-Variation in Expected Returns.” Journal of Business 61, 409-425, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, D. and P. Heyer, Communication in History: Technology, Culture, Society, New York: Longman, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., “The Behavior of Stock Prices.” Journal of Business 38, January, 34-105, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance 25(2), 383-417, (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, “Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 246-273, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets II.” Journal of Finance 46(5), 1575-1617, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi, A. and J. Park, “Seasonal Patterns in Japanese ADR Returns and the US Stock Market Influence.” Japan and the World Economy 8, 65-79, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K., R. G.W. Schwert and R. F. Stambaugh, “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-29, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R. J., Relative Strength-An Indicator for Investment in the Equity Market. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Cranfield College, Cambridge, England, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, A.Y., “Index Size, Autocorrelation and Evolution of Market Efficiency.” Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, December, 2001, forthcoming.

  • Gu, A. Y., “Investors' Maturity and Stock Market Behavior.” Review of the Academy of Finance 1(1), 76-85, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, A. Y., “Information Speed and Stock Market Behavior.” Review of the Academy of Finance, 2(1), 137-146, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, A. Y., “Information Frequency and Stock Return Behavior.” Proceedings of the Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, forthcoming.

  • Hagerman, R. L. and R. D. Richmond, “Random Walks, Martingales and the OTC.” Journal of Finance 2, 897-909, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J., “An Empirical Investigation of the Long-run Behavior of Real Exchange Rates.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 27, 149-214, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, March, 109-126, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, B., “Some Relations between Volatility and Serial Correlation in Stock Market Returns.” Journal of Business LXV, 199-219, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. Y. and J. He., “A Variance-Ratio Test of Random Walks in Foreign Exchange Rates.” Journal of Finance 46, 773-785, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. W. and A. C. MacKinlay, “Stock Market prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test.” The Review of Financial Studies 1(1), Spring, 41-66, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C. and R. A. Schwartz, (Eds), The Challenge of Information Technology for the Securities Markets: Liquidity, Volatility, and Global Trading. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentana, E. and S. Wadhwani, “Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations: Evidence from a Century of Daily Data.” Economic Journal CII, 415-425, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, J. L., “Tests of Random walk and Market Efficiency for Latin American Emerging Equity Markets.” The Journal of Financial Research 18(3), 299-309, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, A.Y., Finnerty, J. The Evolution of Market Efficiency: 103 Years Daily Data of the Dow. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 18, 219–237 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015300817043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015300817043

Navigation