Abstract
Autocorrelation in daily returns of the Dow 30 Index fluctuates significantly over time and reveals a declining trend after World War II. The relation between autocorrelation and volatility is negative and nonlinear. The relation between autocorrelation and volume is also negative and nonlinear. Returns exhibit positive autocorrelation during years with higher autocorrelation, and negative autocorrelation during years with lower autocorrelation. Positive autocorrelation appears more frequently during periods of low volatility, while negative autocorrelation appears more frequently during periods of high volatility. Current period's autocorrelation is related to previous period's autocorrelation and to both the previous and the current period's volatility and rate of return, which implies that investors incorporate previous period's pattern of market behavior into their trading strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabiso, V., K. S. Tunney and C. Zoeller, Flash! The Associated Press Covers the World, The Associated Press and Harry N. Abrams, Inc. Publishers, 1998.
Albright, S. C., Statistics for Business and Economics, New York: Macmillan, 1987.
Bollerslev, T., R. Engle and J. Wooldridge, “A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time Varying Variance.” Journal of Political Economy 96, February, 116-131, (1988).
Campbell, J. Y. and L. Hentschel, “No News is Good News.” Journal of Financial Economics 31, 281-318, (1992).
Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman and J. Wang, “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 905-934, (1993).
Chiang, T. C., “Stock Returns and Conditional Variance-Covariance: Evidence from Asian Stock Markets,” in J. Jay Choi and John Doukas (Eds), Emerging Markets: Finance and Investments, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport, CT, 1998.
Cochrane, J., “How Big is the Random Walk in GNP?” Journal of Political Economy 96, 893-920, (1998).
Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment, Trading Around the Clock: Global Securities Markets and Information Technology, 1990.
Conrad, J. and G. Kaul, “Time-Variation in Expected Returns.” Journal of Business 61, 409-425, (1988).
Crowley, D. and P. Heyer, Communication in History: Technology, Culture, Society, New York: Longman, 1991.
Fama, E. F., “The Behavior of Stock Prices.” Journal of Business 38, January, 34-105, (1965).
Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance 25(2), 383-417, (1970).
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, “Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 246-273, (1988).
Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets II.” Journal of Finance 46(5), 1575-1617, (1991).
Fatemi, A. and J. Park, “Seasonal Patterns in Japanese ADR Returns and the US Stock Market Influence.” Japan and the World Economy 8, 65-79, (1996).
French, K., R. G.W. Schwert and R. F. Stambaugh, “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-29, (1987).
Griffith, R. J., Relative Strength-An Indicator for Investment in the Equity Market. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Cranfield College, Cambridge, England, 1970.
Gu, A.Y., “Index Size, Autocorrelation and Evolution of Market Efficiency.” Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, December, 2001, forthcoming.
Gu, A. Y., “Investors' Maturity and Stock Market Behavior.” Review of the Academy of Finance 1(1), 76-85, (2001).
Gu, A. Y., “Information Speed and Stock Market Behavior.” Review of the Academy of Finance, 2(1), 137-146, (2002).
Gu, A. Y., “Information Frequency and Stock Return Behavior.” Proceedings of the Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, forthcoming.
Hagerman, R. L. and R. D. Richmond, “Random Walks, Martingales and the OTC.” Journal of Finance 2, 897-909, (1973).
Huizinga, J., “An Empirical Investigation of the Long-run Behavior of Real Exchange Rates.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 27, 149-214, (1987).
Karpoff, J. M., “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, March, 109-126, (1987).
LeBaron, B., “Some Relations between Volatility and Serial Correlation in Stock Market Returns.” Journal of Business LXV, 199-219, (1992).
Liu, C. Y. and J. He., “A Variance-Ratio Test of Random Walks in Foreign Exchange Rates.” Journal of Finance 46, 773-785, (1991).
Lo, A. W. and A. C. MacKinlay, “Stock Market prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test.” The Review of Financial Studies 1(1), Spring, 41-66, (1988).
Lucas, H. C. and R. A. Schwartz, (Eds), The Challenge of Information Technology for the Securities Markets: Liquidity, Volatility, and Global Trading. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1989.
Sentana, E. and S. Wadhwani, “Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations: Evidence from a Century of Daily Data.” Economic Journal CII, 415-425, (1992).
Urrutia, J. L., “Tests of Random walk and Market Efficiency for Latin American Emerging Equity Markets.” The Journal of Financial Research 18(3), 299-309, (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, A.Y., Finnerty, J. The Evolution of Market Efficiency: 103 Years Daily Data of the Dow. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 18, 219–237 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015300817043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015300817043