Skip to main content
Log in

The role of metaethics and the future of computer ethics

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the following essay, I will discuss D.Johnson's argument in her ETHICOMP99 KeynoteSpeech (Johnson 1999) regarding the possiblefuture disappearance of computer ethics as anautonomous discipline, and I will analyze somelikely objections to Johnson's view.In the future, there are two ways in whichcomputer ethics might disappear: (1) therejection of computer ethics as an aspect ofapplied ethics, or (2) the rejection ofcomputer ethics as an autonomous discipline.The first path, it seems to me, would lead tothe death of the entire field of appliedethics, while the second path would lead onlyto the death of computer ethics as a separatesubject. Computer technology is becoming very pervasive,and each scientific field includes somediscipline-specific computing. For the likelyforeseeable future, disciplines such asbioethics and engineering ethics will have todeal with ethical issues involving the role ofcomputers. I will argue that computer ethics inthis sense is unlikely to disappear, even ifcomputer ethics ceases to be considered as aseparate discipline.In order to understand which path will befollowed by computer ethics, I will compareJohnson's argument with ideas of earlierthinkers like N. Wiener (1950) and B. Russell(1932). Although Russell did not specificallyconsider computer technology, he had somegood intuitions about the development ofsocieties by means of technology.My conclusion will be two-fold: (1) thatapplied ethics will not die, but it may make nosense in the future to talk about computerethics as a separate field; and (2) thatcomputer ethics will not simply become``ordinary ethics'', contrary to Johnson's view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T.W. Bynum. The Foundation of Computer Ethics. Computer and Society, 30(2), June 2000 (cited as Bynum, 1999).

  • T.W. Bynum. Ethics and the Information Revolution. In G. Collste, editor, Ethics in the Age of Information Technology. Linköping, Centre for Applied Ethics, 2000a.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Dare. Applied Ethics, Challenges To. In R. Chadwick, editor, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume I, pp. 183–190. Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Dyson. The Sun, the Genome, and the Internet. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology Journal, 1: 33–52, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gert. Morality. Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Gorniak-Kocikowska. The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics. In T.W. Bynum and S. Rogerson, editors, Global Information Ethics, pp. 177–190. Opragen, Guildford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gotterbarn. Computer Ethics: Responsibility Regained. In D. Johnson and H. Nissenbaum, editors, Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 18–24. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Hare. Ethics. In R.M. Hare, editor, Essays on the Moral Concepts, pp. 39–54. MacMillan, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Hare. Why Do Applied Ethics?. In R.M. Hare, editor, Essays in Ethical Theory, pp. 1–13. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hospers. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. Routledge, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Johnson. Do Engineers have Social Responsibilities?. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9: 21–34, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Johnson. Computer Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddler River, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Johnson. Computer Ethics in the 21st Century. Keynote address delivers at the Ethicomp 99 International Conference on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Information Technologies. Rome, Luiss Guido Carli University, October 6-8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kaku. Visions. How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st century and Beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, translation by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, http://www.swan.ac.uk/poli/texts/kant/kanta.htm, preface, orig. ed., 1785.

  • T. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Lakatos. Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers Vol. II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. MacIntyre. Does Applied Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Monist, 67: 498–513, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Marturano. Bionics: A Link between Bioethics and Computer Ethics. In T.W. Bynum, J. van den Hoven, D. Gotterbarn and S. Rogerson, editors, Proceeding of Ethicomp 98. Rotterdam, Cict - Erasmus Universiteit, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. McNaughton. Moral Vision. An Introduction to Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Moore. What Is Computer Ethics?. In T.W. Bynum, editor, Computers and Ethics, pp. 266–275. Blackwell, London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rifkin. The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World, J P Tarcher/Putnam, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell. The Scientific Outlook. Allen & Unwin, London, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell. History of Western Philosophy. Allen & Unwin, London, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Toulmin. The Tyranny of Principles. The Hastings Center Report, 11(6): 31–38, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Virilio. La Bombe Informatique. Éditions Galileé, Paris, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Wiener. The Human Use of Human Beings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Wiener. Invention: The Care and Feedings of Ideas. MIT Press, Boston, 1993 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marturano, A. The role of metaethics and the future of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 71–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015202319899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015202319899

Navigation