Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Performance Monitoring on Emotional Labor and Well-Being in Call Centers

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the relationship between performance monitoring and well-being. It also examined a mechanism, namely emotional labor, that might mediate the relationship between them, assessed the effect of the work context on the relationship between performance monitoring and well-being, and examined the relative effects of performance monitoring and work context on well-being. Three aspects of performance monitoring were covered, namely, its performance-related content (i.e., immediacy of feedback, clarity of performance criteria), its beneficial-purpose (i.e., developmental rather than punitive aims), and its perceived intensity. The participants were 347 customer service agents in two U.K. call centers who completed a battery of questionnaire scales. Regression analyses revealed that the performance-related content and the beneficial-purpose of monitoring were positively related to well-being, while perceived intensity had a strong negative association with well-being. Emotional labor did not mediate the relationship between monitoring and well-being in the form hypothesized, although it was related to these two factors. Work context (job control, problem solving demand, supervisory support) did not mediate the relationship between monitoring and well-being, but job control and supervisory support did moderate the relationship between perceived intensity and well-being. Relative to other study variables, perceived intensity showed stronger associations with emotional exhaustion, while job control and supervisory support tended to show stronger associations with depression and job satisfaction. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J. R., DeNisi, A. S., Kirkoff, K., Shao, Y., Lund, M. A., & Chomiak, A. A. (1991). The impact of feedback and individual/group monitoring on work effort. Paper presented at the American Psychological Society, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aiello, J. R., & Shao, Y. (1993). Electronic performance monitoring and stress: The role of feedback and goal setting. In M. J. Smith & G. Salavendy (Eds.), Human–computer interaction: Applications and case studies (pp. 1011–1016.) Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring and work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23, 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alder, G. S. (1998). Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C., Holman, D., Wall, T., Waterson, P., Harrington, E., & Unsworth, K. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 73, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. B., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belt, V., Richardson, R., & Webster, J. (1999, March 19). Smiling down the phone: Women's work in Telephone Call Centres. Call Centre Conference, London School of Economics.

  • Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (1998, August). On the dimensionality of emotional labour: Development of an emotional labour scale. Paper presented at the First Conference on Emotions in Organisational Life, San Diego, CA.

  • Bylinsky, G. (1991, November 4). How companies spy on employees. Fortune, pp. 131–140.

  • Carayon, P. (1993). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Review of the literature and conceptual model. Human Factors, 35, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayon, P. (1994). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Results of two studies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 6, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1995). A control-process perspective on the origins of affect. In L. L. Leonard & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling (pp. 11–52.) Madwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42, 807–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R., & Henderson, R. (2000). Electronic performance monitoring: A laboratory investigation of the influence of monitoring and difficulty on task performance, mood state, and self reported stress levels. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 906–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernie, S., & Metcalf, D. (1998). (Not) Hanging on the telephone: Payment systems in the new sweatshops. Centrepiece, 3, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. D. (2000). Moods and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualise emotional labour. Journal of Occupational Health, 5, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. A., & Higgins, C. A. (1989). Computerised performance monitors: Factors affecting acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38, 306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 15, 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, S. (1992, May). Big boss is watching you. Details, pp. 18–23.

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialisation of human feeling. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, R. H., Higgins, C. A., & Safeyeni, F. R. (1986, August, 29). Computerised performance monitoring systems: Use and abuse. Communications of the ACM, pp. 794–801.

  • Jackson, P., Wall, T. D., Martin, R., & Davids, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 753–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. R., & Maslach, C. (1994). Psychological health and involvement in interpersonally demanding occupations: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 15(2), 101–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. G. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self discrimination, some applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 97–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. (1992). Electronic performance monitoring: A review of research issues. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker, D. M., & Tatum, B. C. (1993). The effects of computer monitoring, standards and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 508–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, K. (1992). Workers under surveillance. Computerworld 26, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B. (1991). Emotional stylists: Strategies of expressive management among trainee hairdressers. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., & Totterdell, P. (1999). Classifying affect regulation strategies, Cognition and Emotion, 13, 277–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1992). Big brother in workplace growing bigger everyday. Reuter Business Report, 15, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behaviour. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 521–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, D. R., & Fielding, P. J. (1988). Source of occupational stress: An examination of British prison officers. Work and Stress, 2, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., & Jones, J. R. (2000). Antecedents of workplace emotional labour dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21, 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, L. M. (1990). Electronic performance monitoring and stress in computer based office tasks: A review of the literature and recommendations for further research. Paper presented at the Midwest Human Factors Conference, Dayton, OH.

  • Smith, M. J., & Amick, B. C. (1989). Electronic performance monitoring and job control. In S. L. Sauter, J. J. Hurrell, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Job control and worker health. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., Carayon, P., & Miezio, K. (1986). Motivational, behavioral and psychological implications of electronic monitoring of worker performance. Washington: Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., Carayon, P., Sanders, K. J., Lim, S. Y., & LeGrande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without monitoring. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, J. M. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review and research directions. Human Performance, 13, 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, J. M., & BarnesFarrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 738–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I. (1991). Maintaining norms about expressed emotions: The case of bill collectors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdell, P., & Parkinson, B. (1999). Use and effectiveness of self-regulation strategies for improving mood in a group of trainee teachers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 4, 219–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B. (Ed.). (1996). Psychology at work (4th ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. B., Cook, J. D., & Wall, T. D. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, P. E., Clegg, C., Bolden, R., Pepper, K., Warr, P. B., & Wall, T. D. (1997). The use and effectiveness of modern manufacturing practices in the U.K. ESRC Center for Organisation and Innovation, University of Sheffield.

  • Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74.) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M., Nicholas, J. P., & Daus, C. S. (1999). An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 1–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Vogt, C., Seifert, C., Mertini, H., & Isic, A. (1999). Emotion work as a source of stress: The concept and development of an instrument. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 370–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, W. J. (2000). Emotional dissonance and employee well-being. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Hartel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice (pp. 189–214.) Westport, CT: Quorum Books.s

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holman, D., Chissick, C. & Totterdell, P. The Effects of Performance Monitoring on Emotional Labor and Well-Being in Call Centers. Motivation and Emotion 26, 57–81 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015194108376

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015194108376

Navigation