Abstract
A major criticism of urban regeneration policies during the 1980s and 1990s in England has been the failure to reduce the gap between the poorest neighbourhoods and the national average for the indices of long-term unemployment, crime rates, health chances and educational qualifications. The UK Government, since election in 1997, has undertaken a wide-ranging review of urban policy. New approaches and more effective use of public sector resources are being piloted in an attempt to identify the pathways to social inclusion, which seem to have been missing in previous regeneration attempts (Audit Commission, 1989; DoEE, 2000). This paper seeks to deepen our understanding of the appropriate balance between physical and social regeneration through proposing an approach that foregrounds the role of residents in neighbourhood regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen H., Munck R. et al., 1999: Neighbourhood images in Liverpool.”It's all down to the people” Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Audit Commission 1999: A life's work: local authorities, economic development, and economic regeneration. Audit Commission, London.
Audit Commission, 1992: Developing local housing strategies. Audit Commission, London.
Audit Commission, 1989: Urban regeneration and economic development: the local government dimension. HMSO, London.
Blair T., 1997a: Speech delivered at the Stockwell Park School, Lambeth, 8 December Cabinet Office, London.
Blair T., 1997b: Speech delivered at the Aylesbury estate, Southwark, 2 June. Cabinet Office, London.
Cattel V. and Evans M., 1999: Neighbourhood images in East London. social capital and social networks on two East London estates. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Cambridge Policy Consultants, 1999: An evaluation of the New Life For Urban Scotland initiative. The Stationery Office, London.
Clapham D. and Evans A., 1998: From exclusion to inclusion. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Department of Education and Employment, 2000: Report of Policy Action Team 2: Skills. Social Exclusion Unit, London.
Department of the Environment, 1997: Regeneration programmes – the way forward'. HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment, 1984: Local housing management. A Priority Estates project survey, Report by Anne Power, HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000: Transferable Lessons in Regeneration from the Housing Action Trusts. London, DETR.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1999a: Best Value in housing framework,Consultation Paper, The Stationery Office, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1999b: Interim evaluation of English Partnerships: final report. Report by PA Consulting Group. HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998a: What works – learning the lessons: final evaluation of City Challenge. HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998c: Planning for the communities of the future. Cm 3885. HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998d: Where does public expenditure go? Pilot study to analyse the flows of public expenditure into local areas. Regeneration research summary no 20. DETR, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998e: Index of local deprivation. DETR, London.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1997: Regeneration programmes – the way forward. Discussion Paper. HMSO, London.
Department of Health, 1993: Implementing community care: population needs assessment. Good practice guidance, Report by PriceWaterhouse. HMSO, London.
GFA Consulting and the European Institute of Urban Affairs, 1999: First draft: sustainable estate regeneration: a guide to good practice..
Gilroy R., 1996: Building routes to power: Lessons from Cruddas Park, Local Economy 10 (4): 248–258.
Hastings A., McArthur A. and McGregor A., 1996: Less than equal: community organisations and estate regeneration partnerships. The Policy Press, Bristol.
Home Office, 1999: Community self-help, report of Policy Action Team 9. Social Exclusion Unit, London.
Holmans B., 1999: Kids at the door revisited. Russell House Publishing, Lyme Regis.
Jacobs J., 2000: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Pimlico, London.
KMPG Consulting, 1999: City Challenge – final national evaluation. DETR, London.
Lee P. and Murie A., 1997: Poverty, housing tenure and social exclusion. Policy Press, Bristol.
Madanipour A. and Bevan M., 1999: Social exclusion in European urban neighbourhoods, Walker, Newcastle upon Tyne: a neighbourhood in transition, Occasional Paper Series, no 2. Centre for Research in European Urban Environments, University of Newcastle.
Meredith B., 1995: The community care handbook, the reformed system explained. Age Concern England, London.
National Audit Office, 1997: Waltham Forest Housing Action Trust: Progress in regenerating housing estates, Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. The Stationery Office, London.
Nevin B., 1998: Renewing the Black Country. An assessment of the employment impact of the Black Country UDC. Local Economy 13 (3): 239–254.
Page D., 1993: Building for communities. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Parkinson M. and Newburn T., 1998: A framework for the evaluation of the New Commitment Pathfinder Areas. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Power A., 1997: Estates on the edge. The social consequences of mass housing in Northern Europe. Macmillan Press, London: (1999 reprint).
Power A. with PEP Associates, 1991: Housing. A guide to quality and creativity. Longman, Essex.
Silburn R., Lucas D., Page R. and Hanna L., 1999: Neighbourhood images in Nottingham. Social cohesion and neighbourhood change. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Smale G., 1998: Managing change through innovation. The Stationery Office, London.
Social Exclusion Unit, 1998: Bringing Britain together: a national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Cm 4045. The Stationery Office, London.
Speak S. and Graham S, 2000: Service not included: social implications of private sector service restructuring in marginalised neighbourhoods. The Policy Press, Bristol.
Stewart M., Goss S., Gillanders G., Clarke R., Rowe J. and Shaftoe H., 1999: Cross-cutting issues affecting local government. Report to the 310 DETR by University of West of England, and The Office for Public Management. The Stationery Office, London.
Taylor M., 1995: Unleashing the potential. Bringing residents to the centre of regeneration. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Walker A. and Walker C., 1997: Britain divided: The growth of social exclusion in the1980s and 1990s. Child Poverty Action Group, London.
Williams C., and Windebank J., 1999: A helping hand: harnessing self-helpto combat social exclusion. York Publishing Services Ltd., York.
Wood M. and Vamplew, C., 1999: Neighbourhood images in Teesside. Regeneration or decline? Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hull, A. Neighbourhood renewal: A toolkit for regeneration. GeoJournal 51, 301–310 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012258625054
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012258625054