Abstract
Root system dynamics, productivity and N use were studied in inter- and sole crops of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) on a temperate sandy loam. A 32P tracer placed at a depth of 12.5, 37.5, 62.5 or 87.5 cm was employed to determine root system dynamics by sampling crop leaves at 0, 15, 30 and 45 cm lateral distance. 15N addition was used to estimate N2 fixation by pea, using sole cropped barley as reference crop. The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), which is defined as the relative land area under sole crops that is required to produce the yields achieved in intercropping, were used to compare the crop growth in intercrops relative to the respective sole crops.
The 32P appearance in leaves revealed that the barley root system grows faster than that of pea. P uptake by the barley root system during early growth stages was approximately 10 days ahead of that of the pea root system in root depth and lateral root distribution. More than 90% of the P uptake by the pea root system was confined to the top 12.5 cm of soil, whereas barley had about 25–30% of tracer P uptake in the 12.5 – 62.5 cm soil layer. Judging from this P uptake, intercropping caused the barley root system to grow deeper and faster lateral root development of both species was observed. Barley accumulated similar amounts of aboveground N when grown as inter- and sole crop, whereas the total aboveground N acquired by pea in the intercrop was only 16% of that acquired in the pea sole crop. The percentage of total aboveground N derived from N2 fixation in sole cropped pea increased from 40% to 80% during the growth period, whereas it was almost constant at 85% in intercropped pea. The total amounts of N2 fixed were 95 and 15 kg N ha−1 in sole cropped and intercropped pea, respectively. Barley was the dominant component of the pea-barley intercrop, obtaining 90% of its sole crop yield, while pea produced only 15% of the grains of a sole crop pea. Intercropping of pea and barley improved the utilization of plant growth resources (LER > 1) as compared to sole crops. Root system distribution in time and space can partly explain interspecific competition. The 32P methodology proved to be a valuable tool for determining root dynamics in intercropping systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott M L and Fraley L J 1991 A review: Radiotracer methods to determine root distribution. Env. Exp. Bot. 31, 1–10.
Anil L, Park R H P and Miller F A 1998 Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci. 301–317.
Blake G R 1965 Bulk density, pp 374–390. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. Eds. C A Black, D D Evans, L E Ensminger, J L White, F E Clark and R C Dinauer. p 768. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Carr P M, Martin G B, Caton J S and Poland W W 1998 Forage and nitrogen yield of barley-pea and oat-pea intercrops. Agron. J. 90, 79–84.
Carruthers K, Prithiviraj B, Fe Q, Cloutier D, Martin R C and Smith D L 2000 Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Yield component responses. Eur. J. Agron. 12, 103–115.
Chalk P M 1998 Dynamics of biologically fixed N in legume-cereal rotations: A review. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 49, 303–316.
Cooper C S and Ferguson H 1963 Influence of a barley companion crop upon root distrubution of alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and orchardgrass. Agron. J. 63–66.
Davis J H C and Woolley J N 1993 Genotypic requirement for intercropping. Field Crop. Res. 34, 407–430.
De Wit C T and Van Den Bergh J P 1965 Competition between herbage plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13, 212–221.
George S J, Kumar B M, Wahid P A and Kamalam N V 1996 Root competition for phosphorus between the tree and herbaceous components of silvopastoral systems in Kerala, India. Plant Soil 179, 189–196.
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2001 Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crop. Res. 70, 101–109.
Hühn M 2000 Non-regular spatial patterns of plants and their effect on several agronomic traits per area. Eur. J. Agron. 12, 1–12.
Ito O, Matsunaga R, Tobita S, Rao T P and Devi Y G 1993 Spatial distribution of root activity and nitrogen fixation in sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping on an Indian alfisol. Plant Soil 156, 341–344.
Izaurralde R C, Chanasyk D S and Juma N G 1994 Soil water under conventional and alternative cropping systems in cryoboreal subhumid Central Alberta. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74, 85–92.
Jacobs E, Atsmon D and Kafkafi U 1970 A convenient method placing radioactive substances in soil for studies of root development. Agron. J. 62, 303–304.
Jakobsen I and Nielsen N E 1983 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in field grown crops. I. Mycorrhizal infection in cereals and peas at various times and soil depths. New Phytol. 93, 401–413.
Jensen A 1985. Evaluation of VA-mycorrhiza as a parameter in breeding field pea. In Proceeding of the 6th North American Conference on Mycorrhiza, Oregon, 1984. Ed. R Molina. p 258. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon, USA.
Jensen E S 1996 Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 182, 25–38.
Knott C M 1987 A key for stages of development of the pea (Pisum sativum). Ann. App. Biol. 233–244.
Lai T M and Lawton K 1962 Root competition for fertilizer phosphorous as affected by intercropping. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58–62.
Marschner H 1986 Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. 674 p.
Midmore D J 1993 Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crop. Res. 34, 357–380.
Nelson S C and Robichaux R H 1997 Identifying plant architectural traits associated with yield under intercropping: Implications of genotype-cropping system interactions. Plant Breed. 116, 163–170.
Ofori F and Stern W R 1987 Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Adv. Agron. 41, 41–90.
SAS 1990 SAS procedure guide, Version 6 Third Edition, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. 705 p.
Snaydon R W and Harris P M 1981 Interactions belowground - The use of nutrients and water. In Proceeding of the International Workshop on intercropping, Hyberabad, India. Ed. R W Willey. pp 188–201. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.
Thomsen A 1994 Program autotdr for making automated TDR measurements of soil water content. Users guide, Version 01. Report 38 Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, DK-8830 Tjele. 29 pp.
Thomsen A and Thomsen H 1994 Automated TDR measurements: Control box for Tektronix TSS 45 relay scanners. Report 10 Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, DK-8830 Tjele. 32 pp.
Tofinga M P, Paolini R and Snaydon R W 1993 A study of root and shoot interactions between cereals and peas in mixtures. J. Agric. Sci. 120, 13–24.
Tottmann D R 1987 The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann. App. Biol. 110, 441–454.
Van Kessel C and Hartley H 2000 Agricultural management of grain legumes: has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? Field Crop. Res. 65, 165–181.
Vandermeer J 1989 The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 237 p.
Willey R W 1979 Intercropping - Its Importance and Research Needs Part 1 Competition and Yield Advantages. Field Crop. Abstr. 32, 1–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P. & Jensen, E. Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops – a field study employing 32P technique. Plant and Soil 236, 63–74 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011909414400
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011909414400