Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wildlife management is limited by uncontrolled and often unrecognized environmental variation, by limited capabilities to observe and control animal populations, and by a lack of understanding about the biological processes driving population dynamics. In this paper I describe a comprehensive framework for management that includes multiple models and likelihood values to account for structural uncertainty, along with stochastic factors to account for environmental variation, random sampling, and partial controllability. Adaptive optimization is developed in terms of the optimal control of incompletely understood populations, with the expected value of perfect information measuring the potential for improving control through learning. The framework for optimal adaptive control is generalized by including partial observability and non-adaptive, sample-based updating of model likelihoods. Passive adaptive management is derived as a special case of constrained adaptive optimization, representing a potentially efficient suboptimal alternative that nonetheless accounts for structural uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC, 19, 716-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. and Dreyfus, S.E. (1962) Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., White, G.C., Brownie, C., and Pollock, K.H. (1987) Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture, American Fisheries Society, Monograph 5.

  • Bookout, T.A., (ed.). (1994) Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats, fifth edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S.E. and Law, A.M. (1977) The Art and Theory of Dynamic Programming, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. and Walters, C.J. (1992) Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics, and Uncertainty, Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., (ed.) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F.A., Moore, C.T., Kendall, W.L., Dubovsky, J.A., Caithamer, D.F., Kelley, J.T. Jr., and Williams B.K. (1997) Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 203-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F.A., Williams, B.K., Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Kendall, W.L., Smith, G.W., and Caithamer D.F. (1993) Developing an adaptive management strategy for harvesting waterfowl in North America. Transactions, North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 58, 565-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F.A. and Williams B.K. (1999) Protocol and practice in the adaptive management of waterfowl harvests. Conservation Ecology, 3, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.M. (1992) Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction, Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubow, B. (1996) SDP: Generalized software for solving stochastic dynamic optimization problems. Journal of Wildlife Management, 23, 738-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J.D. (1992) Capture-recapture models. Bioscience, 42, 94-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J.D., Johnson, F.A., and Williams, B.K. (1995) Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 177-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A.P. and White, C.C. (1977) Optimal Systems Control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, R.F. (1994) Optimal Control and Estimation, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J. (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources, Macmillan Publ. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J. and Hilborn R. (1978) Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9, 57-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. (1996a) Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations. Mathematical Biosciences, 136, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. (1996b) Adaptive optimization of renewable natural resources: solution algorithms and a computer program. Ecological Modeling, 93, 101-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. (1997) Approaches to the management of waterfowl under uncertainty. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 714-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. and Johnson F.A. (1995) Adaptive management and the regulation of waterfowl harvests. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23, 430-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K., Johnson, F.A., and Wilkins K. (1996) Uncertainty and the adaptive management of waterfowl harvests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 223-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K., Nichols, J.D. and Conroy M.J. ____. Analysis and management of animal populations, Academic Press, San Diego, California (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, B.K. Uncertainty, learning, and the optimal management of wildlife. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8, 269–288 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011395725123

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011395725123

Navigation